<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Matthew Yglesias &#187; TARP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/tag/tarp/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 23:15:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Taking the &#8220;TA&#8221; Out of &#8220;TARP&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2008/11/taking_the_ta_out_of_tarp.php</link>
		<comments>http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2008/11/taking_the_ta_out_of_tarp.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 21:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>myglesias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TARP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2008/11/taking_the_ta_out_of_tarp.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paulson says the Troubled Assets Relief Program won&#8217;t actually be buying any troubled assets. On the policy merits, I think Paulson&#8217;s shift into recapitalization was the right idea. Or, rather, the people who I&#8217;ve chosen to trust as my analytic sources on this issue think so. But now I&#8217;m wondering if we don&#8217;t need to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paulson says the Troubled Assets Relief Program <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/video/2008/11/12/VI2008111201324.html">won&#8217;t actually be buying any troubled assets</a>. On the policy merits, I think Paulson&#8217;s shift into recapitalization was the right idea. Or, rather, the people who I&#8217;ve chosen to trust as my analytic sources on this issue think so. But now I&#8217;m wondering if we don&#8217;t need to rename the program. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2008/11/taking_the_ta_out_of_tarp.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
