<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Matthew Yglesias &#187; Reproductive Rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/tag/reproductive_rights/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 23:15:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Freedom of Choice Act</title>
		<link>http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2008/10/freedom_of_choice_act.php</link>
		<comments>http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2008/10/freedom_of_choice_act.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>myglesias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2008/10/freedom_of_choice_act.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Via Kathy G., Sir Charles writes:
One of the things that I dearly hope is that if Obama wins handily and we have a large enough Senate majority, that consideration will be given to passing a federal law codifying Roe v. Wade, including a broad preemption clause to prohibit state laws that interfere with abortion rights. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://thegspot.typepad.com/blog/2008/10/i-approve-this.html">Via</a> Kathy G., Sir Charles <a href="http://www.cogitamusblog.com/2008/10/outrage-de-jour.html">writes</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>One of the things that I dearly hope is that if Obama wins handily and we have a large enough Senate majority, that consideration will be given to passing a federal law codifying <em>Roe v. Wade</em>, including a broad preemption clause to prohibit state laws that interfere with abortion rights.  In one stroke, such a law would blow away the claims that <em>Roe</em> represents an illegitimate attack on the democratic process, stop the state by state chipping away of abortion rights, and make the prospect of a Supreme Court reversal of <em>Roe</em> more remote and far less damaging.</p></blockquote>
<p>There&#8217;s a longstanding legislative initiative along these lines called the <a href="http://www.naral.org/issues/abortion/access-to-abortion/freedom-of-choice-act.html">Freedom of Choice Act</a> that Barack Obama has committed to supporting. My sense is that Democratic pickups will likely make it possible to pass such a bill in some form, though there may be filibuster problems. One issue, though, is what form that would take. The current version of the legislation, as I understand it, includes provisions related to Medicaid financing of abortion services that have a lot less congressional support than would a more limited guarantee. What happens will probably be a function of how willing choice advocates are to compromise in order to get some kind of legislative backstop for the main holding of <em>Roe</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2008/10/freedom_of_choice_act.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
