<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Matthew Yglesias &#187; Meritocracy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/tag/meritocracy/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 23:15:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>I, Outlier</title>
		<link>http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2008/11/i_outlier.php</link>
		<comments>http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2008/11/i_outlier.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 13:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>myglesias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meritocracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2008/11/i_outlier.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I should say the reason I picked up Outliers in the first place was that a friend mentioned that he thought it explained something I&#8217;d been curious about. Specifically, The Economist proclaimed that Will Wilkinson, Ezra Klein, Megan McArdle, and myself were the public intellectuals of the future. To which I remarked:
I think it would [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should say the reason I picked up <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&#038;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FOutliers-Story-Success-Malcolm-Gladwell%2Fdp%2F0316017922%3Fie%3DUTF8%26s%3Dbooks%26qid%3D1227975258%26sr%3D8-1&#038;tag=matthygles-20&#038;linkCode=ur2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325"><em>Outliers</em></a> in the first place was that a friend mentioned that he thought it explained something I&#8217;d been curious about. Specifically, <em>The Economist</em> <a href="http://www.economist.com/theworldin/displayStory.cfm?story_id=12494599&#038;d=2009">proclaimed</a> that Will Wilkinson, Ezra Klein, Megan McArdle, and myself were the public intellectuals of the future. To which I <a href="http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2008/11/i_am_terrifying.php">remarked</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>I think it would be strange if the main qualification for becoming a high-profile public intellectual in the future is that you had to start a personal blog in 2002 or 2003.</p></blockquote>
<p>Gladwell&#8217;s book is all about why this sort of thing happens. Rob Pitingolo <a href="http://blog.robpitingolo.org/2008/11/blogging-outliers.html">spells out the argument in detail</a> and observes that it&#8217;s analogous to Gladwell&#8217;s argument about super-rich software entrepreneurs. Except that even successful bloggers don&#8217;t really get to be super-rich, and certainly not Bill Gates rich. But it&#8217;s a very similar thing where, yes, you need to work hard but also you need to have been the beneficiary of some pretty lucky breaks to even be in a position where you have the possibility of working hard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2008/11/i_outlier.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
