<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Matthew Yglesias &#187; Ideology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/tag/ideology/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 23:15:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Declining Unpopularity of Socialism</title>
		<link>http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2009/04/the_declining_unpopularity_of_socialism.php</link>
		<comments>http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2009/04/the_declining_unpopularity_of_socialism.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 19:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>myglesias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ideology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2009/04/the_declining_unpopularity_of_socialism.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve Benen observes that one problem with attacking Barack Obama as a &#8220;socialist&#8221; is that opposition to socialism isn&#8217;t as popular as it used to be:

Only 53% of American adults believe capitalism is better than socialism. The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that 20% disagree and say socialism is better. Twenty-seven percent (27%) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve Benen observes that one problem with <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2009_04/017676.php">attacking Barack Obama as a &#8220;socialist&#8221;</a> is that opposition to socialism <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/just_53_say_capitalism_better_than_socialism">isn&#8217;t as popular as it used to be</a>:</p>
<p><center><img src='http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/246272140_3a2e8470c5.jpg' alt='246272140_3a2e8470c5.jpg' /></center></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Only 53% of American adults believe capitalism is better than socialism</strong>. The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey found that 20% disagree and say socialism is better. Twenty-seven percent (27%) are not sure which is better. <strong>Adults under 30 are essentially evenly divided: 37% prefer capitalism, 33% socialism, and 30% are undecided</strong>.</p></blockquote>
<p>The generational change here is interesting. I think it reflects the fact that on a basic level &#8220;socialism&#8221; is good branding. The whole idea is that we should put <em>society</em> first rather than <em>capital</em>, or money. That sounds good! But in the United States we never had a Socialist Party so &#8220;socialism&#8221; was primarily associated with the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics which was not at all good. But to people under 30, there&#8217;s less of that old resonance. And saying that Obama, who&#8217;s popular, is a &#8220;socialist&#8221; may simply tend to make people have warmer feelings toward the word &#8220;socialism.&#8221;  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2009/04/the_declining_unpopularity_of_socialism.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Crisis</title>
		<link>http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2008/09/the_crisis.php</link>
		<comments>http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2008/09/the_crisis.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 06:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>myglesias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[uncat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ideology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2008/09/the_crisis.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m blogging under the influence, so perhaps things aren&#8217;t quite as dramatic as they seem to me right now, but the bailout plan on the table right now seems to me like something of a crisis point for American liberalism. The plan is bad. But bad policies get enacted all the time. But we&#8217;re at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m blogging under the influence, so perhaps things aren&#8217;t quite as dramatic as they seem to me right now, but the bailout plan on the table right now seems to me like something of a crisis point for American liberalism. The plan is bad. But bad policies get enacted all the time. But we&#8217;re at a point now where congress is, allegedly, in the hands of progressive leadership. Simply put, if congressional Democrats manage to acquiesce in a plan that spends $700 billion on a bailout while doing nothing for average working people and giving the taxpayer virtually no upside in a way that guarantees that even electoral victory would give an Obama administration no resources with which to implement a progressive domestic agenda in 2009 then everyone&#8217;s going to have to give serious consideration to becoming a pretty hard-core libertarian. </p>
<p>It&#8217;d be one thing for a bunch of conservative politicians to ram a terrible policy through. Then we could say &#8220;well, if some progressives win the next election things will be different.&#8221; But if this comes through an allegedly progressive congress then the whole enterprise starts looking pretty hollow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2008/09/the_crisis.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>107</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
