Matt Yglesias

May 15th, 2009 at 10:44 am

Cantor, Hoyer Forget to Take “AIPAC” Off Their Letter’s File Name

090223_hoyercantor_oconnor

One reason I always try to talk up the virtues of Nancy Pelosi is that I know what the likely alternatives look like in terms of House leadership:

Speaking of Iran and that region, House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.) and Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-Va.) sent out a “Dear Colleague” e-mail Tuesday asking for signatures “to the attached letter to President Obama regarding the Middle East peace process.”

The letter says the usual stuff, emphasizing that Washington “must be both a trusted mediator and a devoted friend to Israel” and noting: “Israel will be taking the greatest risks in any peace agreement.”

Curiously, when we opened the attachment, we noticed it was named “AIPAC Letter Hoyer Cantor May 2009.pdf.”

Seems as though someone forgot to change the name or something.

Of course at the end of the day it’s not as if Hoyer or Cantor actually have much to fear from being so unsubtle about who makes their Israel policy. It is worth noting, however, that while public talk at the AIPAC conference was about devotion to peace, the substance of this letter is to try to make people think there will be a domestic price to be paid for any serious effort to push for a solution. This is similar to how Israel’s land grabs in-and-around Jerusalem are at odds with the Israeli government’s public presentation of itself as interested in peace and disturbed by the lack of a credible partner.

Here’s Cantor and Hoyer teaming up in The Washington Times during the Gaza War, and here’s MJ Rosenberg on the substance of the latest Cantor/Hoyer letter.

Filed under: AIPAC, Eric Cantor, Israel





53 Responses to “Cantor, Hoyer Forget to Take “AIPAC” Off Their Letter’s File Name”

  1. joe from Lowell Says:

    Oh, that’s rich.

    We are being governed by people who haven’t learned how to “work computers.” This is like when the White House released a redacted document, which could be restored to the un-redacted version by turning off the highlighting.

  2. Adam Says:

    Seriously, anyone who bitches about Pelosi needs to think about who would be in her shoes if not her: Steny Hoyer or John Murtha. Gag me now.

  3. SLC Says:

    Three cheers for representative Hoyer for telling it like it is to President Osama. I would surely like to trade my congresscritter, the wife beating antisemitic Israel basher James Moran, with Representative Hoyer.

  4. kid bitzer Says:

    yep. i’m glad aipac does not have undue influence on u.s. foreign policy.

    that way, the u.s. will remain a trusted mediator and an honest broker.

    yep. this is working out great.

  5. joe from Lowell Says:

    Only an anti-semite would look at the fact that the 3rd and 4th ranking members of the House of Representatives dutifully passed on AIPAC’s letter to the President of the United States as their own and conclude that Israel has a powerful lobby in Washington.

  6. Mary Says:

    I would also not Steny Hoyer’s “artful” failure to back up Nancy Pelosi in her claim that the CIA misled her, as if he has any standing to comment, and Jane Harman’s strange silence as well, since she does have standing to comment. With friends like these, who needs enemies?

  7. El Cid Says:

    This makes you an angry anti-semite for even mentioning this story.

  8. soullite Says:

    Adam, good. That way the party couldn’t hide what it is any more.

    At this point, I say give the entire government over to the Republicans. At least that way I can hate them without hearing sniveling Democratic cowards try to convince me that this is how things have to be because they lack the balls to take on bankers, corporations, or the military.

    It’s clear Obama intends to keep torturing people and holding them without trial anyway.

  9. DC Says:

    Looks like something from a Fawlty Towers skit. “Don’t mention the War! Noooo!!”

  10. ron Says:

    Obama gets all the advice on Israel he needs from his campaign finance chairman, Penny Pritzger.
    The Hyatt hotel in Jerusalem, that the Pritzgers built on confiscated Palestinian land, is a clue as to that advice.

  11. Chris Says:

    AIPAC’s strategy right now is to get rid of Jim Jones. We musn’t let them get away with it.

  12. Jack Says:

    Chris,

    Please explain that a bit more if you don’t mind.

  13. Rich in PA Says:

    Don’t be naive: They intentionally kept that file name! This was an AIPAC-mandated test of visible servility.

  14. joe from Lowell Says:

    I guess you haven’t been following the news lately, ron.

    Penny Pritzker isn’t really on the bus anymore.

  15. ExposeTheIsraelLobby Says:

    AIPAC, the Neocons, and their politically rewarded congressional mouthpieces want to strangle Iran just as Iraq was suffocated for a decade before the US Invasion. This was the plan for Iraq: Disband the Iraqi army, de-Baathify down to the lower ranks and foment civil war between the Sunni and Shia, with the ethnic cleansing and defacto Partitioning of Iraq into smaller, weaker states as the ultimate goal.

    Watch the following videos on the carving up of Iraq:
    youtube.com/watch?v=u4MdyJDnSoI
    youtube.com/watch?v=yp_iTR9dI6o

    Journalist Philip Weiss on the Neoconservative agenda:

    “In terms of their politics, they were almost all Democrats and then as soon as the Democratic party suggested that it wasn’t going to have a strong military, Norman Podhoretz and Irving Kristol, the grandfathers of this movement, they went Republican. Why? Because they said, back in the 70’s, a strong American military is needed to protect Israel.”

    Download an mp3 of Phil saying the above here (9:45 minutes in)
    Antiwar.com/Radio – 07/12/2008

    philipweiss.org – blogging all things Neocon, Israel Lobby, Zionism

    Watch the BBC documentary “The War Party”, part 1 of 5

  16. SLC Says:

    Re ExposetheIsraeliLobby

    Gee, Philip Weiss, antiwar.com, the BBC. Mr. Exposed is leaving out counterpunch and stormfront.

  17. Ike Says:

    Eric Cantor (R- Israel)

  18. Chris Says:

    Jack–

    Essentially to AIPAC, Jim Jones is seen as too even handed on the mid east conflict. In particular, they see Jones as siding with the Palestinians. They believe that Hillary is for Israel first. Jones, they believe is an obstacle to this path. I don’t know whether this is true or not but apparently, AIPAC is trying to get rid of Jones quietly, as they can’t risk another Chas Freeman incident as this was bad for PR.

  19. AIPAC and the propaganda battle to build support for an attack on Iran « The Brittle Hum of the Republic Says:

    [...] Canton and Hoyer Forget to Take “AIPAC” Off Their Letter’s File Name Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Why and How Competitive Intelligence Will Become [...]

  20. Jack Says:

    Chris, Wouldn’t surprise me. Thanks.

  21. SLC Says:

    Re Chris

    Would Mr. Chris like to provide a reference to this claim about General Jones. Or is this just his opinion?

  22. Jack Says:

    I understood it to be his opinion.

  23. SLC Says:

    Re Chris

    Ah yes, a little spin on Google News shows that the information comes from Philip Weiss, a totally unreliable source of information.

  24. Ed Marshall Says:

    Hah, vs. your Debka bullshit, birth certificate, pablum, SLC.

    I know his politics vis a vis the Levant would make you scream but Weiss is a damn fine source.

  25. SLC Says:

    Re Ed Marshall

    Hah, vs. your Debka bullshit, birth certificate, pablum, SLC.

    I know his politics vis a vis the Levant would make you scream but Weiss is a damn fine source.

    1. I don’t recall ever using Debka as a source. As for President Osamas’ birth certificate, I was just pulling folks legs around here. Actually, I think that the fucktards at Worldnutdaily and onenewsnow along with Philip Berg, Alan Keyes, John Kwok, and Orly Taitz who are pushing this stuff are whackadoodles who have too much time on their hands, although they do provide some amusement.

    2. Philip Weiss is about as fine a source on Israel related topics as William Dembski is on evolution and Anthony Watts is on global warming.

  26. Jack Says:

    These threads go off on tangents so quickly.

  27. Ed Marshall Says:

    What’s he got wrong that was fact, and not just improper opinion and attitude according to your lights?

  28. abb1 Says:

    Zionism is a disgrace.

  29. SLC Says:

    Re abb1

    Mr. abb1 is a motherfucking piece of filth.

  30. Mythbuster Says:

    SLC is the poster boy for contemporary Zionism. It’s surprising he can even work a key board.

  31. newsrackblog.com » Blog Archive » The DemAIPAClican Party Says:

    [...] Here’s the letter (posted over at itsourcongress.com); here’s what MJ Rosenberg and Yglesias have to say about it. Rosenberg: “not one word in the letter that calls on Israel to do [...]

  32. Software can trip you up « Later On Says:

    [...] Yglesias observes, “It is worth noting, however, that while public talk at the AIPAC conference was about devotion [...]

  33. Maz Says:

    Perhaps this idiot Yglesias (no relation to the talented guitarist and vocalist, thank god) should comment on the
    Hispanic-American lobby attempts through the racist rabble
    La Raza to force pro-Mexican PC bullshit on the American
    people (like “returning” New Mexico and Arizona to Mexico)
    and forcing American taxpayers to subsidize illegals. Thank
    god Israel has a wall to keep out terrorist scum; now, if only the United States could keep out terrorist-supporting scum like Yglesias, we would all be better off. And as for
    land-grab and peace, the Palestinians have balked at every
    offer for an independent state given them; Clinton and Barak
    offered 95 % of the West Bank (and all of Gaza, which could
    have been in Fatah hands in 2000 and not Hamas now…) and
    as usual the Arabs balked. Finally, Palestinians are Canaanites; Canaan is in present day Jordan and southern
    Syria. Jews are descended from Judea, Samaria and Israel,
    the tribal areas that fully encompass modern-day Israel.
    Yglesias, you are an idiot…

  34. Maz Says:

    Perhaps this idiot Yglesias (no relation to the talented guitarist and vocalist, thank god) should comment on the
    Hispanic-American lobby attempts through the racist rabble
    La Raza to force pro-Mexican PC bullshit on the American
    people (like “returning” New Mexico and Arizona to Mexico)
    and forcing American taxpayers to subsidize illegals. Thank
    god Israel has a wall to keep out terrorist scum; now, if only the United States could keep out terrorist-supporting scum like Yglesias, we would all be better off. And as for
    land-grab and peace, the Palestinians have balked at every
    offer for an independent state given them; Clinton and Barak
    offered 95 % of the West Bank (and all of Gaza, which could
    have been in Fatah hands in 2000 and not Hamas now…) and
    as usual the Arabs balked. Finally, Palestinians are Canaanites; Canaan is in present day Jordan and southern
    Syria. Jews are descended from Judea, Samaria and Israel,
    the tribal areas that fully encompass modern-day Israel.
    Yglesias, you are an idiot…might I also mention that
    BEFORE AIPAC (formed in the 1980s) surveys done in the 1960s and 1970s showed support for Israel was 85 % of the US electorate, while it is about 78 % percent now. Anti-Semites cannot stand the obvious reality that most Americans simply support Israel (and fewer Americans like Saudi Arabia, Libya,
    Pakistan, Palestinians and Iran..and other Muslim nations).

  35. SLC Says:

    Re Maz

    In fairness, Mr. Yglesias is of Cuban descent, not Mexican.

  36. bill Says:

    I’m no expert but I have a hard time believing Maz’s contention that “Clinton and Barak [sic] offered 95% of the West Bank (and all of Gaza, which could have been in Fatah hands in 2000 and not Hamas now…) and as usual the Arabs balked.” These people are not stupid. Why would they turn down such a deal unless the “deal” wasn’t quite what Maz says it was–which is pretty much what I’ve been hearing for years. “The Palestinians blew it” is the mantra, and then you hear the details and it turns out the be the same old bullshit. (Oops, does that make me an anti-Semite?)

  37. bill Says:

    “Jews are descended from Judea, Samaria and Israel,
    the tribal areas that fully encompass modern-day Israel.” Yes, except for all the Ashkenazis, who came from Eastern Europe, Russia, etc. What percentage of the Israeli population do these people comprise? Let’s don’t go there, pal. Anti-Semitism works both ways, given that the Arabs are Semitic people as well and they are damn well hated by many, many European Israelis. There is going to have to be an equitable political solution, period, and all the parties are going to have to get on board, including the U.S.

  38. SLC Says:

    Re bill

    The Palestinian leadership rejected the Çlinton/Ross proposal which, indeed consisted of 100% of the Gaza Strip and 95% of the West Bank (if proposed land swaps were included), because it would have required them to give up their demand that Palestinians living in refugee camps be resettled in Israel. This demand on the part of the Palestinians is equivalent to a demand that the Government of Israel go out of business. Since the Government of Israel will never, under any circumstances, accept such a demand, there will be no settlement until the Palestinians drop it. Period, end of discussion.

  39. piotr Says:

    Jews descend from Judea, and this is why they are called Jews.

    But Israel? Weren’t 10 lost tribes, well, lost?

    And as far as Samaritans are concerns, wasn’t there some very, very small number left

  40. bill Says:

    Hm-m-m, “right of return.” If I’d been forcibly ejected from land my family held for generations–to say nothing of my people generally–I might want to have some of that, and I might be pissed if my leaders gave that up without a fight. Especially if I was living in a refugee camp.

  41. HM Says:

    maz – it’s yidiots like you that cause all the mideast problems. Native Americans were here first and we commited genocide against them. Should we now hand this land back to them.? europeans migrated out of Africa many milllions of years ago. Should we hand all of Africa to the Europeans?Modern Isreal is NOT Ancient, biblical Israel. The latter was ordained by G-d as a covenant that if Moses’ people could live by G-d’s word (the Torah), then G-d would keep Isreal intact. Modern Isreal is the final extension of imperialism and colonialism where the Ashkenazi, after suffering anti-semitism at the hands of their gentile brethren, ran to a land inhabited by people they thought as beneath them. Contempt is the way all Zionists have dealt with the Palestinians in specific and Arabs in general. Instead of mixing with the local population, they decided to exterminate them and then proceeded to tell their children that the Arabs voluntarily gave the land up (you know who you people are – I know the conversations you all have during your bridge games in Del Ray). 60+ years ago a crime was committed and it still hasn’t been rectified. Until Tel Aviv accepts a two state solution, Isreal will never achieve peace.

  42. RobertJewett Says:

    From their behavior, i allways thought that the Palestinian were decendents of the acient Philistines. The idea of being forcable ejected from their land, the Palestanian left at the urging of their own leaders, and the same promised death to any arab who sold any land whatsoever to a Jew. The only solution that Fatha, or Hamas will ever accept as finial, is the total end of the state of Isreal, and the death of every Jew. How else can their twelth iman reapear and defeat Christ in the last battle.

  43. omg Says:

    aipac runs pretty much all foreign actions, unfortunite but true. Israel gave a sour deal in the so called “great deal for the palestinians”. Thier greed over the last 61 years is unhindered and ongoing. The pales. are murdered every day, which no one hears about, Thier homes demo daily-still ongoing. Basic needs are kept FROM them. NO voting rights. Thier children watch as israeli children play in thier just watered lawns, as they play in ruble and wish they could drink the water that they use to water grass with. Water is scare to palestinians but plentyful for the isralis! SOME LIFE!

  44. dsmith Says:

    Never in history has such a tiny and economically insignificant county like Israel wielded such influence over the policy-making of a major world powers. But when you can ‘buy’ your country from the U.N. members, that’s not surprising.

  45. Syd B Says:

    any idea how to deal with a nasty group like AIPAC who assisted in the drumbeat to war in iraq and would like to strike up the band for a war with iran?

    i consider the israel first crowd a grave threat to american security, do you?

  46. SLC Says:

    Re bill

    As soon as Mr. bill is willing to advocate the return of the land in the Western Hemisphere that was stolen from the native inhabitants to them, then I will take seriously his demand that the Palestinians be resettled in Israel.

  47. abb1 Says:

    Did I mention that Zionism is a disgrace? Right, but it appears that Zionism is also a brain disease. Dementia of a sort.

  48. Jack Says:

    I understand why Israel seeks to manipulate the United States. That’s what all states do and I don’t hold it against them.

    What bothers me is why Americans aren’t more concerned by the degree of Israeli influence over our political process.

  49. Carroll Says:

    By now anyone who follows politics and foreign policy knows who the AIPAC Israeli reps are in congress so no surprise here.

    Something is happening in the US public though that the Israeli supporters are totally clueless about. I don’t know wha the stats are on where the majority of Americans get their news but one thing I know is probably 99% of them read their local hometown newspapers.
    A lot of the American public who was mostly indifferent to Israel one way or another and don’t follow international news sources
    regularly woke up during Israel’s Gaza rampage.

    Tell you about an event that illustrates this….

    I was at a local deli for lunch one day when a lady came in holding the local newspaper which had front paged pictures of dead Gaza chldren and blistered Israel and congress in their editoral. My hometown is your typical Southern conserative community sandwiched between two Marine bases and our local paper reflects mostly the military, conserative and religious values of the area.
    Anyway the lady was very irate and was holding the paper up over her head and shouting about “how dare they (meaning the paper) show this, why don’t they talk about what the Palestines do to Israel”…and so on. Later someone said they thought she was the wife of a local Rabbi.
    But it was the reaction of the people in the deli that was telling. As she was ranting there was dead silence, everyone was just looking at her. Finally an older gentleman stood up from his table
    and said…”lady, you and Israel and congress can all go to hell”.
    Everyone in the deli started clapping and applauding him.

    I-P and Israel and the US congress has hit Main street USA…this is not going to be good for Israel….the Israelis better wake up because the public is getting ready to rumble on this. One more Israel outrage that is so bad it makes the front pages of small town newspapers across the nation
    and Americans are going to from disgust and shock to outright opposition of ‘any’ US support of Israel.

  50. Jack Says:

    If Israel hits Iran, MANY Americans will die in Iraq and Aghanistan. This will Severely damage Israel with the US public.

  51. SLC Says:

    Re abb1

    Mr. abb1 lacks a brain to be diseased.

  52. Upendraya Says:

    I always enjoy what you have to say, keep up the good work. Do you have a webcam?

  53. Christina Says:

    The Hoyer / Cantor letter about Israel being circulated on the Hill is reprehensible. The file’s original name–“AIPAC Letter Hoyer Cantor May 2009.pdf” as Al Kamen pointed out on May 15–is the least of its offenses. M.J. Rosenberg is disgusted by this letter, going so far as to call it, ‘bipartisanship at its most loathsome”.

    Thankfully, there is an alternative… but only if we encourage our representatives to sign the letter being circulated by Members Boustany, Cohen and Carnahan. This letter supports President Obama’s charted course for American policy in the Middle East, specifically his intention to provide strong American leadership to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian and broader Arab-Israeli conflicts.

    The best way to counteract the Hoyer/Canton letter is to contat your representatives on the Hill and urge them to sign the letter being circulated by U.S. House of Representatives Members Boustany, Cohen, and Carnahan. As of Tuesday, 18 May, 35 signatures have been collected for the Boustany/Cohen/Carnahan letter. That’s just not enough.

    To read the invitation by members Boustany, Cohen and Carnahan to join sign on, click here. To read the letter to President Obama, click here.


Jump to Top

About Wonk Room | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2008 Center for American Progress Action Fund
imageRegisterimageimageRSSimageimageimage image
image
Advertisement

Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
image 

Books By Matthew Yglesias
Book Cover

Heads in the Sand

Buy the book


imageTopic Cloud


Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report




Contact Matthew Yglesias
Use this form to contact blog author Matthew Yglesias.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll


imageAbout Matt YglesiasimageimageContact MeimageimageDonateimage