Matt Yglesias

Feb 20th, 2009 at 11:43 am

The EPA, Climate Change, and You

lisa_p_jackson.jpg

Two great Dave Roberts posts at Grist, one here and one here help us understand the significance of yesterday’s announcement that the Environmental Protection Agency is going to start following the law and regulating CO2 emissions under the Clean Air Act. Joe Romm at Climate Progress also has more on this.






32 Responses to “The EPA, Climate Change, and You”

  1. kafka Says:

    If this signals carbon pricing is now taking a back seat to regulation it’s a major, major mistake.

  2. Aaron Says:

    Again, I think you’re letting your policy preference for CO2 controls slide into sloppiness with the facts, something you ought to avoid while you correctly ream the Post for its inaccuracies. The law does not require EPA to regualte CO2 until it makes an endangerment determination and EPA has defensible grounds for making that decision either way. There isn’t a deadline for that decsion, and it’s fair for EPA to take time to develope a position. Too many people are claiming that the Agency is just willfully violating the law, and that just isn’t true.

  3. Brad Says:

    Matt has never been known to be scrupulous with facts when he is demagoging an issue.

  4. Njorl Says:

    If this signals carbon pricing is now taking a back seat to regulation it’s a major, major mistake.

    In McCulloch v. Maryland, within the unanimously joined opinion (but not in the finding), Chief Justice Marshall stated that the power to tax involves the power to destroy. If the government can regulate co2 emissions they can tax them. It gets tricky, though, because taxation must originate in Congress.

    The EPA does have the ability to levy fines, which I believe was approved by congress. It could institute a standard set of fines based on CO2 emissions. However, if a court decided that these fines were a revenue measure rather than a regulatory enforcement measure, they would be overturned. The sums involved would be very large. I think they would be deemed a revenue measure.

  5. Steve Sailer Says:

    Whatever happened to “global warming?” Why the increasing references to the non-falsifiable “climate change”?

  6. charles Says:

    the Environmental Protection Agency is going to start following the law and regulating CO2 emissions under the Clean Air Act. Joe Romm at Climate Progress also has more on this.

    It doesn’t say that at all. It says merely that the EPA will “reconsider” a prior memo regarding CO2 emissions from coal plants and that this is a “first step” towards regulating such emissions.

  7. lowellfield Says:

    Steve –

    My guess is that relying on the overwhelming scientific consensus about global warming is just not tenable when it’s cold outside. Hence “climate change.”

  8. Steve Sailer Says:

    Good thinking! So if this global warming thing doesn’t work out, you can still be right about “climate change.”

    It’s kind of like Obama’s campaign slogan: “Change.” “Hey,” he can say, “I didn’t promise ‘Change for the Better.’ I didn’t spend three years at Harvard Law School to get caught making actual promises.”

  9. Tom Fuller Says:

    Matt, if you want to get a lot of comments and extra page views, it looks like environmental issues are the way to go. You should buy George Will a drink.

    I hope the EPA gets it right. If they don’t, the consequences could be dire. It’s easy enough to use taxes to reduce emissions from automobiles. But it’s going to be a tricky policy area to reduce emissions from residential heating and air conditioning, especially during tough times.

    What I really hope is that the EPA takes its own sweet time before coming out with prescriptive regulation. This is nowhere near as simple as people think.

  10. Dash RIPROCK III Says:

    Global Warming Theater presents:

    http://www.hootervillegazette.com/globalwarming.html

  11. davis Says:

    It’s easy enough to use taxes to reduce emissions from automobiles.

    You’ve got to be kidding. There would be enormous political opposition to an increase in gas taxes.

  12. Tom Fuller Says:

    Hi Davis,

    There might be–but I think we’re in different times. After paying $4 per gallon for gas, now that it’s back down again, would people fight for 25 cents a gallon? I’m not so sure.

    If it were staged increases presented as part of an overall package, I’m just not so sure. Might help a bit of it were staged asymmetrically with the bulk of the increase coming (hopefully) after the recession.

  13. viagra Says:

    maThfb szluumrr jdftvqzo ezmisvbw

  14. zyban Says:

    Incredible site!

  15. xanax Says:

    Very interesting site. Hope it will always be alive!
    xanax

  16. سحاق Says:

    sry i just know how to write my name in arabic :) ) i dnot think that i understand .. i hate english itis very difcult . thanks

  17. tramadol Says:

    I want to say – thank you for this!
    tramadol

  18. tramadol Says:

    tramadol
    It is the coolest site,keep so!

  19. viagra Says:

    viagra
    Excellent site. It was pleasant to me.

  20. houston limo Says:

    I have read a few of your posts and they are all interesting and informative…keep up the good work.

  21. brand viagra Says:

    I want to say – thank you for this!
    buy cheap viagra

  22. viagra brand Says:

    It is the coolest site,keep so!
    cheap brand pfizer viagra

  23. John1700 Says:

    Very nice site! cheap viagra

  24. John1700 Says:

    Very nice site! cheap cialis http://apxoiey.com/qoxrrt/4.html

  25. Ex Back Says:

    This is very up-to-date info. I think I’ll share it on Twitter.

  26. cheap viagra Says:

    It is the coolest site,keep so! viagra

  27. John1700 Says:

    Very nice site! cheap viagra

  28. John1700 Says:

    Very nice site! [url=http://apxoiey.com/aoxrxx/2.html]cheap cialis[/url]

  29. John1700 Says:

    Very nice site! cheap cialis http://apxoiey.com/aoxrxx/4.html

  30. searsparts Says:

    Hello, I can’t understand how to add your blog in my rss reader.plz tell me thank you.

  31. Vince Delmonte Says:

    This topic is quite trendy on the Internet at the moment. What do you pay the most attention to while choosing what to write ?

  32. orgrxciy Says:

    swPwrf rfrjumifrfzc, [url=http://uuzhvqkcksml.com/]uuzhvqkcksml[/url], [link=http://ryhtswsbtlmp.com/]ryhtswsbtlmp[/link], http://omdylthhmbtm.com/


Jump to Top

About Wonk Room | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2008 Center for American Progress Action Fund
imageRegisterimageimageRSSimageimageimage image
image
Advertisement

Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
image 

Books By Matthew Yglesias
Book Cover

Heads in the Sand

Buy the book


imageTopic Cloud


Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report




Contact Matthew Yglesias
Use this form to contact blog author Matthew Yglesias.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll


imageAbout Matt YglesiasimageimageContact MeimageimageDonateimage