Matt Yglesias
Jan 16th, 2009 at 11:20 am

Requests Thread

What are folks interested in as we head toward the long weekend?

  • Print





104 Responses to “Requests Thread”

  1. David Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 11:26 am

    Matt, I have a request for the next several years. You should really read deeply into political economy and make it your niche. I think your background in philosophy would be wonderful for it.

  2. Galen Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 11:29 am

    Can you talk about the undercurrent of sexism in the insistence that Bill Clinton needs to disclose the foreign connections of his foundation because his wife is going to be part of the Obama administration? Admittedly this is a somewhat unique situation, but I’ve never heard of the wife of a male political figure being asked to disclose her international connections. I think part of the underlying presumption in the current situation is that because Hillary is a woman she will naturally be partially under the control of her husband, so influences on her husband need to be known and factored in. I’m not saying it’s the only dynamic at work, but I think it’s one factor and it’s pretty ugly.

  3. kid bitzer Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 11:29 am

    drone geese. that’s what we should be discussing.

    flocks of unpiloted drone geese.

    clearly the future in anti-aircraft armaments.

    are the canadians already ahead of us?

  4. richard Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 11:31 am

    Public Spectrum Auctions, Securities Transaction Taxes, Consumption Taxes.

  5. Craig Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 11:31 am

    What do you think of Credit Unions. They seem to have a totally different set of regulations than regular banks, but to the consumer they are just banks. Sometimes they have better interest rates, but they are just banks.

  6. Jesse Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 11:32 am

    How about how Obama’s aggressive centrism and bipartisanship square with your previous writing on how polarization and partisanship is good because it allows people to know whom to vote for?

  7. Don Williams Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 11:32 am

    Any truth to the rumor that Obama’s new Secret Service Caddy will be appearing on “Pimp This Ride”?

    http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/Secret-Service-Shows-Off-Obamas-New-Limo.html

  8. PWC Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 11:36 am

    Has ballooning military spending under the Bush administration functioned as an economic stimulus? I can’t find one of those nifty defense spending as GDP charts at moment. Discuss.

  9. Randy Chase Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 11:38 am

    I recently, subscribed to your feed and have been impressed with your insight into a variety of issues. I would like to hear your take on the marijuana issue. As I am sure your aware, Marijuana and other Drug Policy issues rank high in the questions posed to the Obama Transition. What can we as citizen activists do to encourage our politicians to address the issue in a progressive manner ?

  10. MBinNC Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 11:40 am

    I’d be interested in some analysis on the extent to which the 18 point Volker plan restores the elements of Glass-Steagal (1933) that were repealed by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (1999).

    Cross posting from Volcker: Keep Banks Small Enough to Fail

  11. Daniel Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 11:42 am

    What do you think of hte parking meter situation in Chicago? They’re privatizing the meters and Chicagoans are less than thrilled.

    http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/autocorner/chi-getting-around-12jan12,0,1042010.column

  12. Trig or Treat Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 11:51 am

    Football commercials and Tivos/DVRs. Aren’t these damn things getting more annoying and repetitive as the capability to ignore them is growing? If so, why?

  13. Spike Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 11:51 am

    What about a federal tax on billboards located within 500 feet of an Interstate highway? The highway is providing the eyeballs, they should get some of the ad revenue, yes?

  14. spokeytown Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 11:53 am

    DC seems to have a preponderance of hot public officials (at least in comparison to most public officials). Chief Lanier is hot, Superintendent Rhee is hot, and my girlfriend thinks that Mayor Fenty is hot. Not to mention the Obamas, plus Sarah Palin if you like the republican kewpie-doll look. This seems pretty unusual. (Seriously, when was the last time you saw a hot chief of police?) What are we to make of this? Do hot public officials boost employee performance and citizen confidence? Is this a tyranny of the good-looking? What’s going on?

  15. allbetsareoff Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 11:55 am

    Has anybody done the math on how many state/local infrastructure projects are “shovel ready,” the cost of these projects (i.e., what proportion of stimulus funds they might consume), and potential employment numbers? And since this is Matt’s house, what proportion of the projects AREN’T new highway construction?

  16. Trig or Treat Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 11:57 am

    I vote for Spokeytown’s query re hotness. Talk about that.

  17. John Bedell Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 11:58 am

    I work in downtown DC but live in the Baltimore suburbs and ride down on the MARC train. Whenever I read you waxing on about the joys of urban living, I think, “but big buildings are ugly.” I could live in a townhouse neighborhood, provided there was adequate parking, but I just couldn’t live in a big building surrounded by other big buildings. The atmosphere is grim and oppressive. So I wonder, do you like it, do you not care, or do you miss having space and greenery around you?

  18. joejoejoe Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 11:59 am

    What’s the story on the consulting firm Knickerbocker SKD? Does the powerful firm (which represents Michael Bloomberg, Chuck Schumer, Joe Lieberman, and now Caroline Kennedy) have a negative effect on the progressive agenda by pushing the message of liberal NY to the right?

    I think blog coverage of consultants Penn, Schoen and The Glover Park Group had a big role in limiting the influence of the kind of hyper-timid bullshit coming out of those shops but I don’t hear much about Knickerbocker SKD. What’s their story?

  19. Daniel Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 12:10 pm

    I want to know more about the thinking behind something you said the other day: “[Today, as opposed to the late eighteenth century,] there are lots of republics and constitutional monarchies to survey. And my view is that surveying them reveals that pure parliamentary systems (UK, Netherlands, Germany) with an essentially symbolic head of state are superior to presidential (US, Mexico) or semi-presidential (France, Russia, Afghanistan) ones.”

    As someone who comes from Australia — a pure parliamentary system with an essentially symbolic head of state, which will in the near future engage in a new debate over whether or not to dump our head of state and “go it alone” — I’m curious about the empirical side of your view. What, exactly, makes pure parliamentary systems superior to presidential or semi-presidential systems? The answer most folks give to that question is simply “PMQs,” but I’m hoping you might have something a bit more in-depth to say.

  20. joejoejoe Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 12:24 pm

    If you stipulate all of the newly free countries on Bush’s Parade o’ Freedom list, isn’t the net amount of freedom in the world less today than it was in 2000 because of the backsliding in Russia?

  21. ostap Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 12:29 pm

    How come none of you DC blogger types are married?

  22. Brent Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 12:39 pm

    Have you found any good advanced stats that quantify NBA players’ defensive abilities? Dave Berri, Hollinger, and others do some nice stuff but I’m frustrated to see nothing beyond blocks and steals in their analyses. +/- numbers work kinda okay, but they’re so broad that sometimes I’m not sure they mean much, especially with smallish sample sizes.

    Henry Abbott had a post lamenting the lack of things like effective screens not showing up in box scores, and it’s so much more true for things like rotating on defensive, drawing charges, containing dribble penetration, getting a hand in the face of a shooter, etc. Yet I wonder if anyone is trying to keep track of stuff like that. I’m sure many NBA teams try to.

  23. Dave Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 12:44 pm

    What are the roots of the phrase:

    I’m in ur “x” “y”-ing ur “z”

    ?

  24. glaxaco Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 12:56 pm

    Now that the Bush II era is finally coming to an end, how the hell did GWB become the Republican front runner in 2000 to begin with? Was there a cabal of old Republican men who tapped him as the one to get the early funding and endorsements? If so, did they simply think he was electable, would be a good President, someone they could control, or some combination?

    I don’t vote for Republicans much so maybe I’m biased, but even in the early days of the ‘00 campaign Bush seemed like an incompetent lightweight who seemed to duck hard answers to questions – kind of like Dan Quayle without the ethics. I’m not the smartest guy around, so what did others see in him?

  25. Sander Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 12:59 pm

    My sense is that when we are not in election season, the percentage of non-partisans (whatever that means) paying close attention to intricate policy issues and decisions drops dramatically. This suggest to me that politically there is not a lot of for Obama to gain from moderating decision relating to devilish details except as part of more or less explicit deals with individual members of Congress. A lot of the immoderate decisions of the Bush years can be traced to this sort of thinking. what are your thoughts? If you agree with me, what are the most significant policies implicated?

  26. Korea Beat Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 1:05 pm

    Obama’s plans for dealing with North Korea and the deployment of US troops in South Korea.

  27. marcus Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 1:15 pm

    Obama has mentioned “laying broadband lines” as part of the economic stimulus package. I assume this will be done to do what the telecoms said they would do when we gave them tax breaks (fiber optic internet cables ), help small communities and rural communities, and help create a 21st economic infrastructure. 1) Is this getting any attention in the stimulus package? 2) If so, do you think a net neutrality law must be passed to go hand in hand with this investment?

  28. Ben Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 1:18 pm

    It seems to me that a large part of our financial mess is the fact that many banks are over leveraged to 20:1 or 30:1. How does the stimulus package help this, or what are people suggesting policy wise to fix this?

    If you take this into account, does it really make sense to give tax cuts to the people that are going to spend it? It almost sounds to me like we need people to save so that the leverage rate goes down.

  29. Nemo_N Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 1:19 pm

    “Comic Book” or “Graphic Novel”?

  30. Linkmeister Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 1:21 pm

    If the stimulus plan as outlined in the NYT really does mean reduced FICA withholding, what about the self-employed and unemployed, who don’t get paychecks and thus don’t have FICA withheld?

  31. Sports Guy Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 1:22 pm

    How is it that sports unions (e.g. NBAPA, NFLPA, MLBPA, etc.) have persevered in spite of a generally anti-union climate in the US? These unions seem to garner a lot of sympathy for standing up to the team owners and getting their fair shake, but that same sentiment doesn’t extend to, say, the UAW. And this is despite the fact that owning a professional sports team is generally a terrible investment and a not particularly lucrative business (with the exception of a few teams, like the Yankees). It seems to me that the players get very positive treatment from the public, whereas blue collar unions are often portrayed as greedy. Assuming you agree with this premise, do you have any ideas why this disparity exists?

  32. 24AheadDotCom Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 1:26 pm

    I’d like MattY to read this with an open mind and with as much of an interest in being intellectually honest as he can muster and then admit that FactCheck et al have been lying to us. Just concentrate on answering this basic question: “is FactCheck lying or not?” The answer is clearly ‘yes’.

    Obviously, I don’t think MattY is intellectually honest enough to do that.

  33. ron Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 1:33 pm

    Youtube some of Byron Dorgan’s speeches from the senate floor and then tell us why he should be a favorite of libruls.

  34. jl Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 1:36 pm

    War on drugs, lack of debate in government or mainstream media on legalization, Obama’s stance, etc.

  35. JimboSlice Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 1:54 pm

    Will Obama let the cat out of the bag about what happened at area 51, or will he be like every other president and just let the cover up continue?

  36. JimboSlice Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 1:55 pm

    # Daniel Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 11:42 am

    What do you think of hte parking meter situation in Chicago? They’re privatizing the meters and Chicagoans are less than thrilled.

    http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/autocorner/chi-getting-around-12jan12,0,1042010.column

    http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2008/12/parking_meters.php

  37. Drew Steen Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 2:01 pm

    Why do public transportation systems generally operate at a loss (alternately, why hasn’t the private sector figured out how to operate profitable bus systems)? Is it as simple as, the cost savings of mass transit don’t make up for the value people put on the freedom of driving their own cars, or is it more complicated? Are there regulatory issues involved?

  38. wahoofive Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 2:08 pm

    I second marcus’s suggestion to talk about broadband penetration and fiber-optic. This seems like it will do more for future economic development than bridges and railroad tracks. What can the government do which will actually unleash competition in the Internet business and get out of the telco/cable duopoly which has led us to falling behind the rest of the civilized world in Internet connectivity?

  39. Andrew S. Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 2:12 pm

    The big telco’s cite the major investment in infrastructure that they have to make as a reason to do away with network neutrality. Are there any plans to make broadband infrastructure part of future stimulus packages, being as we are lagging behind so many industrialized countries in broadband connectivity? It seems to me that it would have a positive effect for a long time, similar to a bridge or rail.

  40. Andrew S. Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 2:20 pm

    What are the roots of the phrase:

    I’m in ur “x” “y”-ing ur “z”

    ?

    http://encyclopediadramatica.com/index.php/I_am_in_your_base_killing_your_d00ds

  41. Andrew S. Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 2:34 pm

    I guess I should read the entire thread before putting in my thoughts…

    Consider me a third for marcus’ suggestion.

  42. Dan Cock Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 2:47 pm

    Space cooperation with China, and the space arms race.

  43. Jim Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 3:24 pm

    Re: Krugman’s column today. If Obama said, “I’m going to prosecute all the Bushies who’ve broken the law,” wouldn’t that force Bush to pardon everyone in sight?

    Whereas if Obama says, “We’ll concentrate on the future, not the past,” then maybe Bush will go easy with pardons. Once Bush is gone, then it’s safe for Obama to start prosecutions…provided that there’s enough public pressure for him to justify the change.

    Discuss.

  44. paul Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 3:55 pm

    i’m wondering what you make of this bizarre david brooks column: http://www.iht.com/articles/2009/01/16/opinion/edbrooks.1-409073.php

  45. Don Williams Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 4:34 pm

    Re paul’s comment “i’m wondering what you make of this bizarre david brooks column: ”
    —————-
    That’s David Brooks trying to cop an insanity plea.

  46. Tatty Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 5:53 pm

    I’d like to strongly second Randy Chase (comment 9) and suggest that you tackle marijuana policy in all of it’s dimensions (i.e. political, economic, criminal). If you don’t feel up to that, can you just talk about why legalization is still considered an untouchable subject by politicians when it rocked the vote Massachusetts and Michigan and is a three-time winner at http://www.change.gov?

  47. Jasper Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 6:01 pm

    How about an open thread on movies?

  48. saah Says:
    January 16th, 2009 at 10:16 pm

    What do you think of the obama inaugaral seder? http://obamaseder.blogspot.com/

  49. datadave Says:
    January 17th, 2009 at 8:44 pm

    I’d like to see what the USA is going to do about it’s growing unemployment problem. All the economists are seriously under counting it, IMO. The economy has maybe 3 months to turn around (hardly likely) or double digit unemployment (and I mean mid teens….to twenty percent) is likely by end of year. Employers aren’t going to keep people on the payroll when no money is rolling in… and demand for product is falling off the cliff.

    What contingencies are people thinking if it gets that far?

  50. cheapdssoftware Says:
    January 27th, 2009 at 11:15 am

    Cheap Windows vista only for $99 and other softwares available at 70% discount at http://oem-search.net/

  51. opefrarma Says:
    February 1st, 2009 at 7:58 pm

    buy viagra
    1 generic viagra
    10 min viagra
    10 minute viagra approved by fda
    10 vs 20 viagra
    100 mg viagra
    100mg viagra
    10mg viagra
    10mg vs 20mg viagra experiance

  52. gosha Says:
    February 12th, 2009 at 7:46 pm

    3MfLMQ hi! http://msn.com my site

  53. Ryancastsadszw Says:
    February 15th, 2009 at 10:15 am

    Hey guys,
    I am Ryan i just joined this forum and i am glad to be a part of it . I am basically
    lurking around the internet all day long. A few weeks back i came acorss this site where it stated
    all i have to do is enter my email and select between a choice of 3 laptops ( Dell , Macbook , Sony) and
    i get to take home the selected laptop. Well my first thoughts were this was just gonna be a
    waste of time but nonetheless whats the harm in just entering my email ?so i gave it a shot and entered my email
    and selected Sony ,guess what ? After 2 days i got an email asking for the address where the laptop should be shipped
    i still could not believe it but still replied back with my address. Finally after 7 more days the laptop arrived
    it was unbelievable but yet it was real. Guys you can do the same thing and get your free laptop.

    If you are interested just click on the link below and select the laptop of your choice and
    enter your email. Thats it !! Nothing more. You get your laptop within 10 days time.

    Click Here To Get Your Free Laptop

  54. VolizioKrushavec Says:
    February 16th, 2009 at 2:17 am

    I rewcently found a great IE plugin.
    http://www.download.com/Free-YouTube-Video-Downloader/3000-12512_4-10904885.html?tag=mncol
    I didn’t expect taht YouTube video is so easy to convert. And I didn’t have to pay a cent! Oh that finance crysis :(

    And how do you download youtube?

    What has one horn and gives milk? A milk truck.

  55. JoanMirrors Says:
    February 20th, 2009 at 5:22 pm

    Best porno!!!!!!!
    Britney Spears… Angelina Jolie C. Aguilera

    Click here

  56. cialis Says:
    March 1st, 2009 at 6:04 pm

    cialis
    Excellent site. It was pleasant to me.

  57. viagra Says:
    March 4th, 2009 at 3:49 am

    pIEfJQ mvjoekxg pyrircmn qbyduurk

  58. Smoofttuddy Says:
    March 4th, 2009 at 9:24 am

    Download Empire: Total War Crack
    Empire: Total War Crack
    http://uploading.com/files/SO8XRII5/etw_crack.rar.html

  59. cialis salg Says:
    March 7th, 2009 at 10:19 pm

    wlzrstvm uwpmwxkt sjpdfvrl

  60. achat cialis Says:
    March 7th, 2009 at 10:53 pm

    lrlyyask nukevtvf uzsxkycx

  61. viagra Says:
    March 7th, 2009 at 11:42 pm

    lelrjukg ctlmpfew euydulgm

  62. viagra online Says:
    March 8th, 2009 at 12:22 am

    fxoveayn iqycvpss ucmrvmyx

  63. viagra Says:
    March 8th, 2009 at 1:07 am

    dubptugu kfqbtgup mxyzifkh

  64. comprare viagra Says:
    March 8th, 2009 at 1:48 am

    npulfojh vnxntmjc exhhwbsy

  65. compra cialis Says:
    March 8th, 2009 at 3:28 am

    hzoheiqt mnlsjaik wkievnwh

  66. viagra online Says:
    March 8th, 2009 at 3:19 am

    agnctlsf wceduwxo bvgoqsav

  67. comprar cialis Says:
    March 8th, 2009 at 4:49 am

    tdmnrwug flqrxdmx esofqoee

  68. cialis online Says:
    March 8th, 2009 at 5:23 am

    aicquvbv fckwmjen gllofxvi

  69. køb viagra Says:
    March 8th, 2009 at 6:09 am

    zmiqgaus eufufyrw ewzjwqir

  70. viagra Says:
    March 8th, 2009 at 6:44 am

    ebipghcj ucqoqbwt ewsnltfd

  71. comprar cialis Says:
    March 9th, 2009 at 4:07 pm

    blpkczks sawcrknj cecqejxf

  72. AngqWEWbXZUplJxvVl Says:
    March 10th, 2009 at 6:33 pm

    ywYwkP txbxetez auhjnnws umuoqvez

  73. viagra Says:
    March 11th, 2009 at 4:27 am

    It is the coolest site,keep so!

  74. xanax Says:
    March 14th, 2009 at 5:08 am

    Great site. Good info
    xanax

  75. johnKravatrick Says:
    March 15th, 2009 at 5:32 am

    Just an idea for those of you who are into converting streaming video. I have used a brilliant program called WebVideoRip for a long time to download online movies from YouTube, Facebook and Hulu. This utility lets you capture movies in automatic and semi-automatic mode and doesn’t require any more attention. http://webvideorip.com – webvideorip.com is where you can download a free trial version that will only record 3 minutes of video. WebVideoRip will also download and convert multiple videos at the same time.

    I waste 5 hours until finally discover this yglesias.thinkprogress.org resource. Thank you gurus… :)

  76. VolizioKrushavec Says:
    March 15th, 2009 at 5:43 am

    I yesterday discovered a great Internet Explorer plugin.
    http://www.download.com/Free-YouTube-Video-Downloader/3000-12512_4-10904885.html?tag=mncol
    I didn’t expect that YouTube movie is so easy to download. And I didn’t have to pay a cent! Oh that finance crysis :(

    And how do you download youtube?

    Remember, the end never justifies the meanness.

  77. tramadol Says:
    March 17th, 2009 at 2:24 am

    Incredible site!
    tramadol

  78. John938 Says:
    March 20th, 2009 at 4:33 am

    Very nice site! [url=http://oixypea.com/oxoxrqr/2.html]cheap cialis[/url]

  79. John938 Says:
    March 20th, 2009 at 4:33 am

    Very nice site! cheap viagra

  80. John938 Says:
    March 20th, 2009 at 4:33 am

    Very nice site! cheap cialis http://oixypea.com/oxoxrqr/4.html

  81. John1863 Says:
    March 20th, 2009 at 11:42 pm

    Very nice site! [url=http://opeaixy.com/qsqaxra/2.html]cheap cialis[/url]

  82. John1863 Says:
    March 20th, 2009 at 11:43 pm

    Very nice site! cheap viagra

  83. John1863 Says:
    March 20th, 2009 at 11:43 pm

    Very nice site! cheap cialis http://opeaixy.com/qsqaxra/4.html

  84. John1863 Says:
    March 20th, 2009 at 11:43 pm

    Very nice site!

  85. John1863 Says:
    March 22nd, 2009 at 4:38 am

    Very nice site! [url=http://yieopxa.com/yxyrqox/2.html]cheap cialis[/url]

  86. John1863 Says:
    March 22nd, 2009 at 4:38 am

    Very nice site! cheap cialis http://yieopxa.com/yxyrqox/4.html

  87. tramadol Says:
    March 22nd, 2009 at 6:02 am

    tramadol
    I bookmarked this site. Thank you for good job!

  88. KristFry Says:
    April 1st, 2009 at 10:27 pm

    Hello people ! This is my 1st job & I expect to realize some pirate!

  89. brand viagra Says:
    April 2nd, 2009 at 5:06 am

    It is the coolest site,keep so!
    buy cheap viagra

  90. KristFry Says:
    April 4th, 2009 at 11:32 pm

    Hey guys! basic rhythm paleing and I’m tickled pink I set up this forum !

  91. John1086 Says:
    April 10th, 2009 at 8:18 am

    Very nice site! cheap viagra

  92. John1086 Says:
    April 10th, 2009 at 8:18 am

    Very nice site! cheap cialis http://apxoiey.com/aoxrxx/4.html

  93. John1086 Says:
    April 10th, 2009 at 8:19 am

    Very nice site! [url=http://apxoiey.com/aoxrxx/2.html]cheap cialis[/url]

  94. John1086 Says:
    April 10th, 2009 at 8:19 am

    Very nice site!

  95. duppygymn Says:
    April 11th, 2009 at 1:24 pm

    Beware of your Dealings with this companys Mehul Vyas is a Liar and thief. You will hear lies about your project is almost done over and over. This guy went so low as to cry on the phone to me about his family in India.
    Dont let him play your emotions and take your money. Bottom line he and his assosiates are thiefs.

    It is of my opinion that Parties involved with him are not yet aware of his nature.

    If you confront hiom about this he will have a big storry of how he is the Victim. NO HE IS A MANIPULATIVE THIEF!! And there are dozens of companies that have experienced this.

    If You have not trust on Above word then I have written name of people and amount which they are asking from the company and Mobile no of them please verify that and trust on me.

    If you have been victimised by him his new number is 805-296-2802

    This number probably wont last long.

    Employee Name Amount (Rs) Mobile No.

    Mehul Shah 46173 9727531085

    Sehul davavala 87110 9327628123

    Vimal Sutariya 138000 9925923770

    Prashant Parihar 132950 9427630770

    Ankita Gajjar 81667 9428733985

    Anal Bhalsod 40050 9427109116

    Idris Hakim 54750 9228582356

    Faruki Hamidullah 66000 9727072147

    Hetal vyas 58750 9924330698

    Vipul Tanna 164450 9428850859

    Gyan Prakash 83100 9428106359

    Mona Limbachiya 44400 9825084002

    Sunil Acharya 118747 9904646046

    Ankit Patel 21000

    Umesh Panchal 27000 9974591486

    Maulik Dave 22950 9824611288

    Brijesha Modi 16200 9426358962

    Viral Kayastha 148500 9909157818

    Payal Mulani 27000

    Maurya Patel 24300 9924500356

    Abha ratnakar 64800 9909159513

    Tejal Rupera 59400 9898048267

    Dhaval thaker 20250

    Swati Sharma 24300

    Jayesh Patel 54000 9898553717

    Suma Bhavasar 51850 +175000 9979506890
    (credit card used by mehul vyas)

    Ankita Patel 27000

    Akshat Shah 17550 9979765457

    Vinay Bhagat 40000 (Aprrox) 9427398989

    Hemant Pancholi 18000 (Aprrox) 9998794271

    Jigisha Variya 43000 9723311345

    Priyanka Chauhan 10000 9327071260

    Sumit Srivastava 24000

    Hitesh Gopani 23500 9925355094

    Regards,


Jump to Top

About Wonk Room | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2008 Center for American Progress Action Fund
imageRegisterimageimageRSSimageimageimage image
image
Advertisement

Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
image 

Books By Matthew Yglesias
Book Cover

Heads in the Sand

Buy the book


imageTopic Cloud


Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report




Contact Matthew Yglesias
Use this form to contact blog author Matthew Yglesias.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)

imageArchives


imageBlog Roll


imageAbout Matt YglesiasimageimageContact MeimageimageDonateimage