2010 Arizona Senate trial heat Napolitano 53%, McCain 45%. Early polling has little value, but this kind of early weakness is the hallmark of a beatable candidate. Of course my assumption is that McCain won’t actually be running for re-election.
I have seen Napolitano’s name popping up for a spot in an Obama administration, as he is supposedly impressed with her. Google says she would be considered for Homeland Security
why wouldn’t mccain run as an incumbent senator in 2010? I can only assume that the vindictive prick’s plan B is to spend 4-8 years harassing a president obama from the senate.
do you really think mcsame will go gently into that good night?
Obviously this means that Arizona is not the Real America. And looking at Ted Stevens’ poll number, even Alaska isn’t Real America anymore. I’m confused!
Google says she would be considered for Homeland Security
Oh, God, this would be awesome. My Arizonan father thinks Obama is a Muslim leftist, but also thinks Napolitano chews gum and kicks butt, and is fresh out of gum. His head go kaboom if she ends up running DHS for Obama.
do you really think mcsame will go gently into that good night?
You mean, as opposed to losing to an Obama-supporting woman who’s more popular in Arizona than he is?
And despite my DHS fantasies, it might be more useful to have her flip a Senate seat to D once she’s term-limited out as governor. Maybe White House appointments should stick to people that we wouldn’t miss from Congress, like Rahm.
Not that I’m impressed a lot, but this is a lot more than I expected when I stumpled upon a link on Furl telling that the info is quite decent. Thanks.
November 1st, 2008 at 10:06 am
If McCain loses, Obama should appoint him the Secretarty
of Some Asinine Department, so the question of his
re-election does not arise.
November 1st, 2008 at 10:11 am
If McCain loses, Obama should appoint him the Secretarty
of Some Asinine Department
No he shouldn’t. And, thankfully, he won’t.
November 1st, 2008 at 10:17 am
OT — Matt and Josh Marshall from The Strand (June 08) on CSPN2 right now — 10:15 am sat eastern.
November 1st, 2008 at 10:53 am
An aside… If the dems win everything, could they change election day to a Sunday/Saturday or change election day to a national holiday?
It is absurd that our elections are on a Tuesday/non-holiday. I don’t think that it is like how it is here anywhere else in the world.
November 1st, 2008 at 11:59 am
I have seen Napolitano’s name popping up for a spot in an Obama administration, as he is supposedly impressed with her. Google says she would be considered for Homeland Security
November 1st, 2008 at 1:22 pm
Of course my assumption is that McCain won’t actually be running for re-election.
Is Matt’s assumption that McCain will be President??
November 1st, 2008 at 1:53 pm
why wouldn’t mccain run as an incumbent senator in 2010? I can only assume that the vindictive prick’s plan B is to spend 4-8 years harassing a president obama from the senate.
do you really think mcsame will go gently into that good night?
November 1st, 2008 at 1:55 pm
Obviously this means that Arizona is not the Real America. And looking at Ted Stevens’ poll number, even Alaska isn’t Real America anymore. I’m confused!
November 1st, 2008 at 2:02 pm
Oh, God, this would be awesome. My Arizonan father thinks Obama is a Muslim leftist, but also thinks Napolitano chews gum and kicks butt, and is fresh out of gum. His head go kaboom if she ends up running DHS for Obama.
You mean, as opposed to losing to an Obama-supporting woman who’s more popular in Arizona than he is?
And despite my DHS fantasies, it might be more useful to have her flip a Senate seat to D once she’s term-limited out as governor. Maybe White House appointments should stick to people that we wouldn’t miss from Congress, like Rahm.
November 2nd, 2008 at 9:42 pm
Thanks
March 11th, 2009 at 4:45 am
Excellent site. It was pleasant to me.
March 17th, 2009 at 2:29 am
If you have to do it, you might as well do it right
tramadol
March 22nd, 2009 at 6:18 am
tramadol
If you have to do it, you might as well do it right
April 2nd, 2009 at 5:24 am
Very interesting site. Hope it will always be alive!
buy cheap viagra
April 8th, 2009 at 7:35 pm
Not that I’m impressed a lot, but this is a lot more than I expected when I stumpled upon a link on Furl telling that the info is quite decent. Thanks.
April 9th, 2009 at 6:24 am
Excellent site, It was pleasant to me. viagra
April 9th, 2009 at 7:41 am
FANTASTIC!
April 15th, 2009 at 5:19 am
This is quite a up-to-date info. I think I’ll share it on Facebook.
April 19th, 2009 at 8:56 am
qLCiha cjbmtchyymqs, [url=http://rsuflpzzrcsw.com/]rsuflpzzrcsw[/url], [link=http://epnebqaqnhny.com/]epnebqaqnhny[/link], http://razgoqxbqvek.com/