
Stanley Kurtz unleashes a self-described “October surprise”:
It took me a while to put the pieces together, but I think I’ve figured out what’s had the Obama camp so worried about the Chicago Annenberg Challenge records. It goes way beyond Bill Ayers. In fact, it connects the dots between Ayers, Jeremiah Wright, and Obama’s own early radicalism. I lay out the details today in my new piece, “Wright 101.” The gist of what I found is that, from his position as board chair at the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, Barack Obama was funneling hundreds of thousands of dollars to education programs built around the same extremist anti-American ideology preached by Jeremiah Wright. As I argue in today’s piece, this puts the Wright issue back in play in this campaign.”
Specifically, the Chicago Annenberg Challenge on whose board Obama served gave a grant to an outfit called the Coalition for Improved Education in [Chicago’s] South Shore (CIESS). CIESS was “linked to a network of schools within the Chicago public system” called the “South Shore African Village Collaborative.” According to Kurtz, this network which was linked to an organization which got a grant from a group on whose board Obama served, “was very much a part of the Afrocentric ‘rites of passage movement’” and also at time did events featuring guys named Jacob Carruthers and Asa Hilliard. These two, in turn, seem to have held fringy opinions somewhat similar to some of Jeremiah Wright’s fringy opinions. Ergo, according to Kurtz, Wright is back on the table.
I’d say McCain’s in luck with this one! Obama’s doomed!
Seriously, though, is there anyone who could withstand this kind of guilt-by-association. Obama was on the board of an outfit that gave a grant to an outfit that was linked to another outfit that organized an event where some dude spoke, and thus Obama is responsible for the dude? Really? I spoke at the Heritage Foundation once. Does that make Heritage’s board members responsible for stuff on my blog? It doesn’t make any sense.
UPDATE: I should make clear that I don’t know anything about Jacob Carruthers or Asa Hilliard other than that, according to Kurtz (who’s not a reliable source), they had fringey ideas. I’m told by a colleague that Hilliard, at least, was no fringe figure at all.
October 14th, 2008 at 4:20 pm
Of course McCain’s transition chief was a lobbyist for Saddam Hussein. Why do they even want to play the guilt by association game?
October 14th, 2008 at 4:22 pm
I think there are serious questions about the judgment of someone who’s paling around with conservative ideologues.
There are fascinating arguments indicating that Grover Norquist may have ghost written Heads in the Sand. But will the MSM look into it? No!
October 14th, 2008 at 4:23 pm
… and that dude was in a movie with Kevin Bacon!
October 14th, 2008 at 4:24 pm
> I spoke at the Heritage Foundation once. Does that
> make Heritage’s board members responsible for stuff
> on my blog?
No. But it does make you personally responsible, and culpable, for every position that the Heritage Foundation has taken over the last twenty, thirty years. Can’t you see that?
October 14th, 2008 at 4:24 pm
Hugh Hewitt, I’m sure, will be adding Jacob Carruthers to the list of previously anonymous but ominous nonentities that we should be gravely concerned about.
Beware the Obama/Rezko/Ayers/Wright/Carruthers/Some-Muslim-College-Professor Chicago Thugocracy!
October 14th, 2008 at 4:24 pm
Is Seven Degrees of Kevin Bacon, I mean Barack Obama, really the October surprise?
I guess it is better than the I am rubber you are glue strategy that they are currently employing.
October 14th, 2008 at 4:24 pm
Like McCain’s ’80’s connection with the “Freedom Foundation” connects him with violent racists and anti-Semites?
http://www.sunstateactivist.org/ssablog/
October 14th, 2008 at 4:24 pm
I spoke at the Heritage Foundation once. Does that make Heritage’s board members responsible for stuff on my blog? It doesn’t make any sense.
Oh noessssss!!!! MY is a plant doing the Republican Party’s dirty work!! Seriously though, when have Republicans ever made much sense? They haven’t since at least Commander Codpiece became CiC, if not before.
October 14th, 2008 at 4:26 pm
Why does Kevin Bacon hate America?
October 14th, 2008 at 4:27 pm
for 5+1/2 years John McCain lived among a group of people who were attacking our troops and government; can we really trust..?..etc…etc…
October 14th, 2008 at 4:31 pm
John McCain was endorsed by Arnold Schwarzennegger. Why does John McCain support the murder of single mothers within our own borders via time-travelling cyborgs?
October 14th, 2008 at 4:32 pm
Today’s right wingers are desperate to show how many clowns can be fit in the Republican car.
October 14th, 2008 at 4:34 pm
It would be more straightforward to say that Obama was working for Annenberg, Annenberg was friends with Reagan, and Reagan illegally traded arms for hostages and illegally funded the Contras.
What do you think the chances are that Reagan ghost wrote Dreams from my Father?
October 14th, 2008 at 4:39 pm
Whenever I read Stanley Kurtz I always imagine him with white make-up and a big red round nose. That way i dont get angry at the constant bs he produces.
October 14th, 2008 at 4:43 pm
Kurtz needs a nap. Wright’s beliefs may or may not be a legitimate issue, but there’s no reason why any of this nonsense should play a role, since Obama *really was* palling around with Wright for years.
Whatta clown.
October 14th, 2008 at 4:49 pm
Mr. Colonel Kurtz proves without a doubt that Obama is in fact the fifth beatle and the man who shot JFK. I await the reunion concert on the white house grassy knoll, film by O. Stone, of course.
October 14th, 2008 at 4:50 pm
There are all sorts of things wrong with this. First of all, she wasn’t a mother yet when the cyborg tried to kill her (and admittedly, killed several innocents in the process). In addition, need I remind you that said time-traveling cyborg not only repented for that attempted murder, but actually came back specifically to protect that single mother AND her child from other time-traveling cyborgs? Just like democRAT to ignore pertinent facts.
October 14th, 2008 at 4:53 pm
Kurtz needs a nap. Wright’s beliefs may or may not be a legitimate issue, but there’s no reason why any of this nonsense should play a role, since Obama *really was* palling around with Wright for years.
That’s the strange part. Why the elaborate connect-the-dots? Wright’s views didn’t matter when Obama was in Wright’s church every Sunday. I think they’re getting flummoxed by their own 3 Card Monty.
October 14th, 2008 at 4:54 pm
OMG HE HELPED TEH POOR BLAKS WITH LERNING!!!!!!
October 14th, 2008 at 4:54 pm
It is true that anyone running for President would be wise to conceal any evidence that they were a known associate of Matt Yglesias.
October 14th, 2008 at 4:54 pm
Today’s right wingers are desperate to show how many clowns can be fit in the Republican car.
It sounds more like their desperate to see how few. Even the clowns think they’re full of shit.
October 14th, 2008 at 4:54 pm
Seitz is wrong. The cyborg that tried to kill Sarah Connor died unrepentant. The cyborg that came back to help her was a different cyborg of the same model. To quote Reagan, facts are stupid things.
October 14th, 2008 at 4:54 pm
Didn’t Mrs Annenberg donate a bunch of money to the McCain campaign? Why is John McCain taking money from a terrorist sympathizer?
October 14th, 2008 at 4:55 pm
Here’s the example I use. I have a friend who is a close friend of Gen Musharraf. Therefore, I am responsible for the turmoil in Pakistan. With only two degrees of separation! And it gets even worse. Musharraf is friends with Bush, so I am also responsible for everything that’s gone wrong in America, too.
October 14th, 2008 at 4:56 pm
Finally I know who’s doing all that good Heritage work. And that leads (indirectly) to Kurtz himself. Keep up the good work MY. That’s why it’s called a liberal front organization.
October 14th, 2008 at 4:58 pm
Does anyone remember who Annenberg was? Owner of T.V. Guide. Nixon’s ambassador to Great Britain. What does it say about Obama that he was associated with an organization funded by that guy?
October 14th, 2008 at 4:59 pm
First of all, she wasn’t a mother yet when the cyborg tried to kill her
You’re forgetting that life begins at conception and that there were a good 30-45 minutes of the movie during which Sarah Connor was, in fact, an expectant mother while the cyborg was trying to kill her.
October 14th, 2008 at 5:03 pm
Typical left-wing anti-zygote developmentalism. She was pregnant by the end of the movie, therefore, in the eyes of God, a mother.
October 14th, 2008 at 5:03 pm
MY is leaving out a crucial portion of Stanley Kurtz’s case. The case should be summarized as follows:
See? It’s really pretty straightforward.
October 14th, 2008 at 5:12 pm
I know people who voted for the SHRUB ,does that make them guilty of treasonous acts???????????That`s how silly and diverted the REICH is.
October 14th, 2008 at 5:26 pm
I have, by the way, a theory about Bill Ayres. He’s an undercover FBI agent, tasked, back in the 1969s, with undermining and, ultimately, destroying the radical left in the US. By advocating (and, subsequently, refusing to condemn) politically-motivated violence, he brought the left into disrepute. His reward? A cushy, prestigous position in a major university. What could be clearer or more obvious?
October 14th, 2008 at 5:27 pm
And McCain is going to lay this on Obama tomorrow night? We’re screwed! Obama should just concede the election right now.
October 14th, 2008 at 5:28 pm
Being from Chicago and traveling the circles that Kurtz is obsessed about… I find all of this HILARIOUS. Jacog Carruthers who passed away not long ago founded the Center for Inner City Studies at Northeastern Illinois University. I fact he did promote Afrocentric education. This is not controversial. He believed that young Black children could bridge the achievement gap if they were instructed about this history of Africa. He is not crazy RADICAL. I taught at Northeaster Illinois for years and worked as an adjunct at the center for Inner City Studies. This is an EPIC FAIL…
October 14th, 2008 at 5:46 pm
In his article “Wright 101″, Kurtz links to an earlier article of his (”No Liberation”: http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NDkyZTNiZDdkMTNiNzViZTYxNDU0MTY4MzMzMzNmZDU= ), which quotes Obama revealing himself to the “Chicago Reader” in 1995 as supposedly being a Wright-type “radical”, but in which Kurtz casually adds: “True, when discussing Louis Farrakhan with [interviewer] De Zutter, Obama makes a point of repudiating anti-white, anti-Semitic, and anti-Asian sermons.”
His “radicalism” in Kurtz’s articles seems to consist entirely of believing that black churches should become more politically activist. Indeed, in that Chicago Reader article that Kurtz quotes ( http://www.chicagoreader.com/features/stories/archive/barackobama/ ), we find: “Obama thinks elected officials could do much to overcome the political paralysis of the nation’s black communities. He thinks they could lead their communities out of twin culs-de-sac: the unrealistic politics of integrationist assimilation — which helps a few upwardly mobile blacks to ‘move up, get rich, and move out’ — and the equally impractical politics of black rage and black nationalism — which exhorts but does not organize ordinary folks or create realistic agendas for change.
The article then quotes Obama: “It’s time for politicians and other leaders to take the next step and to see voters, residents, or citizens as producers of this change. The thrust of our organizing must be on how to make them productive, how to make them employable, how to build our human capital, how to create businesses, institutions, banks, safe public spaces — the whole agenda of creating productive communities. That is where our future lies.
“The right wing talks about this but they keep appealing to that old individualistic bootstrap myth: get a job, get rich, and get out. Instead of investing in our neighborhoods, that’s what has always happened. Our goal must be to help people get a sense of building something larger…
“Any African-Americans who are only talking about racism as a barrier to our success are seriously misled if they don’t also come to grips with the larger economic forces that are creating economic insecurity for all workers — whites, Latinos, and Asians. We must deal with the forces that are depressing wages, lopping off people’s benefits right and left, and creating an earnings gap between CEOs and the lowest-paid worker that has risen in the last 20 years from a ratio of 10 to 1 to one of better than 100 to 1…
“Historically, African-Americans have turned inward and towards black nationalism whenever they have a sense, as we do now, that the mainstream has rebuffed us, and that white Americans couldn’t care less about the profound problems African-Americans are facing.
“But cursing out white folks is not going to get the job done. Anti-Semitic and anti-Asian statements are not going to lift us up. We’ve got some hard nuts-and-bolts organizing and planning to do. We’ve got communities to build.”
This is a black racist or a dangerous radical?
October 14th, 2008 at 5:59 pm
It makes perfect sense to wingnuts, who see more conspiracies that Jim Garrison.
It would be fun to go back to see all the “radical” stuff that was thrown at the catholic JFK. It’s what the right wing does.
John
October 14th, 2008 at 6:05 pm
Another Papist apologist, eh? You just won’t be satisfied until there are Papal shoes stomping on our face, forever.
October 14th, 2008 at 6:20 pm
I’m told by a colleague that Hilliard, at least, was no fringe figure at all.
Yeah, plus the concept of educational pedagogy and classroom practice in the U.S. being largely euro-centric is hardly anything new. This is mainstream stuff in school districts with large African-American student populations. Whether you think it’s valid or not (and I do), there is absolutely nothing “fringe” about it.
October 14th, 2008 at 6:23 pm
Well, back in 1960 Ronald Reagan did write a letter to Richard Nixon urging him to attack JFK as a “Marxist”.
October 14th, 2008 at 6:25 pm
This is “DaVinci Code” stuff here.
One must unravel the hidden meaning behind the symbols to see the truth of Obama’s Marxist radicalism.
Either a good impression of the paranoid style or a sad reminder that it isn’t rightwingers who desperately yearn for a simple world that makes sense.
October 14th, 2008 at 6:27 pm
All I know about Asa Hilliard is that the city of Chicago named one of the city’s public housing projects after him (the semi-nicer one designed by Bertram Goldberg). I doubt they’d name city housing after a Black Panther or something.
October 14th, 2008 at 6:43 pm
Anyone that’s black is fringy to the right-wing.
October 14th, 2008 at 6:45 pm
“Either a good impression of the paranoid style or a sad reminder that it isn’t rightwingers who desperately yearn for a simple world that makes sense.”
I forgot to include the irony emoticon with my conspiracy theory…
October 14th, 2008 at 6:52 pm
Please DO NOT FORGET that Bill Ayers is the son of the CEO of Commonwealth Edison, that radical group that empowered the entire Democratic Machine of Chicago, the Chicago Black Panther Party, Fred Hampton, Mayor Daley (1 and 2), Al Capone, the Chicago Cubs AND the Chicago White Sox, the Chicago Seven and the band, Chicago (except when unplugged), Michael Jordon, Mike Ditka and Jim McMahon, Jesse Jackson etc. The Ayers family is at the center of the town at the center of the country and hence, at the center of all world history. The MSM cannot shine a light on this, because the Conspirators OWN the LIGHTS.
Don’t light a candle — curse the darkness.
October 14th, 2008 at 7:01 pm
Let me bottom line this for BHO/DNC apologists like MattY: BHO gave money to a radical group. That contradicts the line (from “fact checkers”) that the CAC was only involved in “mainstream” initiatives.
Once again, the DNC needs to decide whether they want all this to come out before or after the election. In either case, millions of people are going to come to the conclusion that the DNC perpetrated a fraud on the American public. When will the damage be less severe, now or later? Perhaps MattY could have a chat with someone there.
October 14th, 2008 at 7:05 pm
There is also the association of Senator McCain and his campaign adviser Charles Black with the Reverend Sun Yun Moon of the Unification Church who makes Reverend Wright look like a sober mainstream pastor.
http://scienceblogs.com/dispatches/2008/10/another_mccainrev_moon_tie.php#more
October 14th, 2008 at 7:14 pm
SLC: No one is allowed to mention the generation-old Republican affiliation with the Unification Church. For some reason, it’s one of those open secrets. Nor their subsidizing of the ever-failing Washington Times.
October 14th, 2008 at 7:29 pm
Back when I was a young lad in the U.S. Navy (circa 1964) there was a guy in our barracks who had a locker full of right wing books and literature. One in particular stuck in my mind, it was titled “The Plot to Murder Marilyn Monroe”. It featured in the centerfold a picture of a large crowd. Circled in one corner was a figure labeled “Marilyn Monroe” and across the page, separated by a several thousand or so people, was a figure labeled “murderer”. The argument was that the picture proved the plot. I never understood how that was supposed to prove the plot since MM didn’t die until a coupe years after that picture was taken, but it was enough for this guy.
I get the same feeling about the McCain campaign… if they can mention two things in the same breath, they feel they have made the connection. Proof to them is in the mind of the beholder.
And this passes for “conservative leadership!” Jeez…
October 14th, 2008 at 7:30 pm
I met both Howie Machtinger once as well as Bernadine Dohrn in their Weathermen days.
I was also part of a theater group with Marilu Henner’s roommate.
I met Bill Gates at a Macintosh User Group.
My younger brother’s first wife worked as a researcher for Playboy, when the underground cartoonist Skip Williamson was an art director.
I just designed a bookmark giveaway for Ralph Covert, who has a show on The Disney Channel.
Professor Irwin Corey was a friend of the family of my college roommate.
And I attended the school and lived in the neighborhood where Barack Obama taught.
Don’t you SEE?
Doesn’t it all FIT?
You have no idea what you’re dealing with! The Si-Fan–the King in Yellow–French Canadian Bean Soup–
October 14th, 2008 at 7:37 pm
actually, 24ahead, that isn’t the bottom line in the slightest: if you think obama “gave” annenberg money to anyone as though it were his money, you’re stupider than i think you are.
and that’s saying something.
October 14th, 2008 at 7:41 pm
It’s not difficult to find out who Asa Hilliard is.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asa_Hilliard
October 14th, 2008 at 7:54 pm
Re: In either case, millions of people are going to come to the conclusion that the DNC perpetrated a fraud on the American public.
In your fever dreams maybe.
Obama will be judged (if elected) by how well he does as president. No one will give a hot damn if he once upon a time knew people who knew people who were evil– or even if he knew evil people directly–most of us do run into some real creeps in life, after all.
When I 19 I worked at a bar where, among others, there was an employee who was an ex-drug dealer, and even an ex-murderer (OK, manslaughterer– he had blown away is wife in a fit of jealous rage). I actually got to know the ex-dealer, I went to parties that he and his fiance hosted, attended their wedding, kept up for some years with them until I lost touch with them at the beginning of this decade.
There, by your logic I am forever barred from elective office because of my past associations.
October 14th, 2008 at 7:56 pm
“Seitz is wrong. The cyborg that tried to kill Sarah Connor died unrepentant. The cyborg that came back to help her was a different cyborg of the same model.”
This is inaccurate as well – cyborgs don’t die, because they aren’t alive. Thus, they aren’t killed, but destroyed. Second, a cyborg isn’t repentant or unrepentant – it merely carries out it’s programming. You need to have some sort of independent moral consciousness – which cyborgs don’t have – to have the possibility of repentance.
That also means that cyborgs don’t “help” Sarah Connor, any more than a hammer “helps” Sarah Connor drive a nail into the corpse of this dead discussion. Rather, it’s really her son in the future sending back various tools (which are admittedly cyborgs in this instance) that actually helps her.
October 14th, 2008 at 8:29 pm
Good points, burritoboy, but you’re missing the larger existential question asked and mostly answered by the second movie–what is consciousness? What is conscience? Are these distinctly human traits or does a cyborg programmed to mimic these traits possess them as much as any human? Does not the terminator say, as he is lowered into the vat of molten lava, “Now I know why it is you cry.”
Thus sayeth Schwartzenegger.
October 14th, 2008 at 8:40 pm
burritoboy conveniently glosses over the obvious tensions underlying cyborg movies such as Blade Runner and those Johnny Five flics wherein the line between sentience and programming is blurred and even vaporized.
Meanwhile, this Kurtz stuff just makes me like Obama even more. The quotes from the articles Bruce Moomaw cites for us evidence an astounding thoughtfulness on the part of Sen. Obama. I can’t believe we might have a president with such well-developed views about race, community development, and social change.
October 14th, 2008 at 8:48 pm
Yglesias admits he’s Manchurian Blogger from the Heritage Foundation. News at 11.
October 14th, 2008 at 11:02 pm
Yupp, Matt, if you were black you would have some explaining to do. Who IS Matt Yglesias? And why isn’t he telling us the truth about his relationship with himself?
October 15th, 2008 at 12:18 am
Mistah Kurtz, he dumb.
October 15th, 2008 at 12:22 am
As a liberal, I’m quite concerned about Obama’s connections with the Annenberg challenge.
Of course, not because of Ayers or whatever Chicago boogieman the GOP has in their sights today, but because Obama had control over disbursing $50 million in education grants, and (according to the wikipedia page) the Annenberg challenge’s own internal study showed that there was no improvement in any school that got grant money, versus ones that didn’t. I just hope he learned something from it.
October 15th, 2008 at 5:05 am
Here’s how Obama should answer if McCain brings up Ayers:
The Republicans have been very poor at governing but they’re excellent at negative campaigns. Every election year, they tear the opponent down, George Bush did. But the result of their governance is disastrous: $10 trillion in debt. We’re fighting 2 wars. The greatest financial crisis in 80 years. The morst partisan admin ever. Our reputation across the world in tatters.
To avoid accountability for this, John McCain wants to change the subject so we don’t talk about the fact that he voted for Bush 90% of the time he was wracking up this disastrous record.
But since mcCain wants to talk about Ayers, I just want to point out that whatever bad thing about me he’s implying to me through this guilt-by-association smear will aply to him. I have worked with Senator McCain in the US Senate, so by his standard, any aspect of my past will apply to him. If he says I have been palling around with a terrorist, well Senator McCain has been associated with me.
But guilt by association is a stupid standard. That’s one reason we haven’t made this campaign about the fact that McCain calls G. Gordon Liddy, a man who was convicted for plotting acts similar to Ayers’ despicable crimes, McCain calls him a great American this year. McCain has long known Ollie North who sold weapons to the same Iranian regime McCain now wants to bomb.
But this election is not about guilt by association smears. it’s about delivering health care to the uninsured and dropping premiums for the insured. It’s about a middle class tax cut for 95% of Americans. It’s about ending the war in Iraq and ripping Al Qaeda to shreds in Afghanistan. This is a serious election. It’s a pity a man like McCain wants to ignore the serious issues our country faces to deal in silly smears.
October 15th, 2008 at 6:06 am
If this is viable, then Sarah Palin’s links to the AIP are square in the sights
October 15th, 2008 at 11:44 am
Some basic fact checking shows just how dumb Kurtz’s story is.
The Chicago Annenberg Challenge fund was – duh – a challenge fund; the Annenberg Foundtion donated $49.2M to CAC over a five-year period conditional on CAC raising matching funds in a ratio of 2:1. Thus CAC’s total budget was $147.6M.
Kurtz’s article says that CAC made a donation of $200K to CIESS in 1996, and “large Annenberg grants throughout the 1990s”, although he doesn’t specify how much. (That’s sloppy phrasing by the way – CAC couldn’t have made donations throughout the 90s, since it only got going in 95/96).
Assuming, generously, that the grants were $200K per year throughout the five years the challenge was running, that’s $1M.
Or, to put the figure in context, 0.6% of CAC’s total budget. And CIESS used some, presumably rather small, fraction of that amount to fund teacher training days at which two academics with views similar to Reverend Wright spoke.
So Kurtz’s entire case boils down to this:
Senator Obama chaired a grant-making organisation which awarded 0.6% of its total budget to an educational organisation which, in turn, devoted some small fraction of that amount to funding teacher training events at which two academics with offbeat views spoke.
That’s it. And the wingnuts on The Corner profess themselves amazed that TMM doesn’t run with these kinds of stories…
October 21st, 2008 at 10:49 pm
William Ayers is a professor of education at the University of Illinois at Chicago, with whom Barack served on the board of an education-reform organization in the mid-1990’s. According to the Associated Press, they are not close: “No evidence shows they were “pals” or even close when they worked on community boards years ago …” (http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D93KD6Q00&show_article=1)
Smear groups and now the McCain campaign are trying to connect Obama to acts Ayers committed 40 years ago – when Barack was just eight years old. Here’s what the New York Times reported on the connection (http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/04/us/politics/04ayers.html)
November 29th, 2008 at 11:41 pm
Please register to gain free access to WSJ tools. An account already exists for the email address entered. TARP II: TARP I hardly got the welcome Hank Paulson and Ben Bernanke wanted. After a brief applause, economists widely criticized it;
December 15th, 2008 at 10:06 pm
GLENSHAW — An FBI agent was shot and killed Wednesday while serving a warrant at a home near Pittsburgh. The agent was shot at around 6 a.m. in Indiana Township, about 10 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, said
January 18th, 2009 at 11:36 pm
laptop battery
laptop batteries
February 25th, 2009 at 3:40 pm
I just love your weblog! Very nice post! Still you can do many things to improve it.
February 26th, 2009 at 6:45 pm
my God, i thought you were going to chip in with some decisive insght at the end there, not leave it with
February 26th, 2009 at 6:50 pm
I usually don
February 26th, 2009 at 6:50 pm
You are a very smart person!
March 1st, 2009 at 5:05 am
viagra
I want to say – thank you for this!
March 1st, 2009 at 5:44 pm
cialis
Incredible site!
March 12th, 2009 at 10:47 pm
It is the coolest site,keep so!
March 14th, 2009 at 4:58 am
Excellent site. It was pleasant to me.
xanax
March 17th, 2009 at 2:19 am
Excellent site. It was pleasant to me.
tramadol
March 22nd, 2009 at 3:05 am
Very nice site! [url=http://yieopxa.com/yxyrqox/2.html]cheap cialis[/url]
March 22nd, 2009 at 3:05 am
Very nice site! cheap cialis http://yieopxa.com/yxyrqox/4.html
March 22nd, 2009 at 3:05 am
Very nice site!
March 22nd, 2009 at 5:54 am
tramadol
I want to say – thank you for this!
March 23rd, 2009 at 4:21 am
viagra
Great site. Good info
April 2nd, 2009 at 4:57 am
Great site. Good info
buy cheap viagra
April 3rd, 2009 at 4:00 am
I want to say – thank you for this!
cheap brand pfizer viagra
April 9th, 2009 at 4:49 am
It is the coolest site,keep so! viagra