Matt Yglesias

Oct 5th, 2008 at 5:11 pm

Palin and Sudan

When I heard Sarah Palin say at the VP debate that she’d had the Alaska Permanent Fund divest from Sudan to protest the Sudanese government’s actions in Darfur, I assumed that she had, in fact, had the Alaska Permanent Fund divest from Sudan. On the one hand, it was a totally plausible story — a lot of publicly controlled funds have divested. And on the other hand, it would be bizarre to tell such a straightforward lie. And yet lie she did:

“The [Palin] administration killed our bill,” said Alaska state representative Les Gara, D-Anchorage. Gara and state Rep. Bob Lynn, R-Anchorage, co-sponsored a resolution early this year to force the Alaska Permanent Fund – a $40 billion investment fund, a portion of whose dividends are distributed annually to state residents – to divest millions of dollars in holdings tied to the Sudanese government.

In an e-mail later, Gara clarified that he believed opposition from the Palin administration helped kill his bill, but was not solely responsible for its death.

Bizarre.

Filed under: Honesty, Palin, Sudan





94 Responses to “Palin and Sudan”

  1. raft Says:

    as andrew sullivan would say…

  2. Craig Says:

    Maybe she doesn’t know what she did. I’d hate to thinkit, but with her it’s a distinct possibility. Yikes!

  3. Craig Says:

    Then again, I bet she does know that it’s perfectly safe to lie since she won’t have to explain the lie to a real journalist. Unless, of course, some major media outlet decides to keep a running journal of “the lies of Sarah Palin.”

  4. Wang Chung Says:

    There ya go again, Matt, with your gotcha journalism and factual references. You can’t see but I’m winking as I submit this comment.

  5. Jay Andrew Allen Says:

    We’ve reached (some would say gone beyond) the point where, if Gov. Palin says she did something, you can assume she did the exact opposite until proven otherwise.

  6. Ringo Meza Says:

    I’d like to know more about the community that Mr. Barack ‘Community Organizer’ Obama had supposedly organized before moving on to bigger things. The last time I drove through there the only thing organized about the place was the drug trade, or as some may call it, organized crime. I need to see results, not rhetoric. What has Obama accomplished for others? We already know what he has accomplished for himself, with his Harvard degree and all. If Obama gets the presidency, then that is another great thing he can put down on his resume. But I need to know what do I get out of it. Selfish me, huh?

  7. Steve Sailer Says:

    You mean she doesn’t actually think Alaska or American has any state or national interest in a big chunk of damn-all in the middle of nowhere battled over by tribes that we can’t even sort out?

    Jeez, Matt, stop trying to make me vote Republican!

  8. dannity Says:

    Good God Matt. Now look what you’ve done. You’ve vaguely touched on a topic that’s drawn Steve Sailer out of the woodwork.

    Please be more careful in the future. Thanks.

  9. Joel Says:

    ” Selfish me, huh?”

    Nah. Just stupid you.

  10. kth Says:

    And Sailer cracks us all up again. I’m definitely a Powell Doctrine kind of guy when it comes to foreign interventions. But financially isolating ourselves from the Sudanese warlords doesn’t exactly put us waist-deep in the Big Muddy, now does it?

  11. Adam Says:

    Sailer, you should probably realize you drew the exact opposite conclusion as the facts represent. She *killed* the bill that was trying to get Alaska out of investing funds in Sudan. She left the funds there, and then lied about it.

    And by the way, as I understand it was an investment fund for Alaska’s massive oil profits that had a very small percentage somehow involved with Sudan. That’s hardly foreign aid.

    So in other words, you’re completely wrong about everything in your post.

  12. Jake Says:

    I suspect her handlers had her mention this to give the impression she’s shown some leadership as an executive. As it is, it seemed fairly misplaced in the course of the debate. It certainly wasn’t in direct response to a question.

    I’ve stopped assuming the truth matters to these folks. Only the optics matter.

  13. msw Says:

    She can say any damn thing she wants. She answers to no one but John McCain and he’s in the back alley shooting craps with Tom Brokaw.
    Do you think a journalist is going to call her down on this shit. Do you think one of Washington’s inside McCain’s belt loop buddies is going to ask John why he picked an idiot and a liar for a running mate? Fat friggin’ chance.

  14. eric k Says:

    Adam,

    Sailor didn;t misread anything. Sick racists like him think it is perfectly fine to invest money in genocidal regimes if they are simply killing other blacks. The only criteria should be is the fund making money.

  15. brenna Says:

    There’s nothing more disgusting than to use a lie about trying to protect the victims of genocide for your own political gain.

    Unbelievable.

    Just. Criminal.

  16. brenna Says:

    eric k,

    Sick racists like him think it is perfectly fine to invest money in genocidal regimes if they are simply killing other blacks.

    it’s not blacks killing other blacks. it’s arab africans killing black africans.

    not that black africans killing black africans is excusable… just have to clear the record.

  17. Ed Marshall Says:

    it’s not blacks killing other blacks. it’s arab africans killing black africans.

    ummm…

    What you said was very technically correct. Do you know though, that there is no way of looking at these people and knowing which one considers themselves Arab?

    This is a subject that the media just absolutely sucks about, but the people will mostly look the same, they may or may not have the same religion, it’s about nomads vs. farmers. It’s about water and agricultural land vs. grazing land.

  18. Ed Marshall Says:

    Maybe I danced around there too much.

    Do you know that Arab Africans are black?

  19. flory Says:

    I’ll bet it’s even more bizarre than a simple, straightforward lie. Bible Spice is clueless enough that she probably dimly remembers that such a bill was voted on in the legislature and just assumes it was passed. She likely has no frackin’ idea what her own state government is doing.

  20. Pants on Fire Says:

    There’s a special circle in hell reserved for liars. I wonder how religious people justify all the lies she’s been telling.

  21. sanity Says:

    It’s not bizarre; it’s preemptive.

  22. Richard Steven Hack Says:

    “Bible Spice” – I gotta remember that one.

    “MILF From Hell” would be another one, but Sarah Connor has that one sewed up.

  23. Hector Says:

    This is, actually, very disturbing. There is no justification for continuing to invest in Sudan, and there’s certainly no justification for Palin lying about it.

    My opinion of Sarah Palin just fell by a lot.

    Sailer, we may not be able to solve the genocide but we don’t bloody need to finance it.

  24. giovanni da procida Says:

    Adam says,

    So in other words, [Steve Sailor is] completely wrong about everything in [his] post.

    Does this even need to be pointed out? It’s the normal state of affairs.

  25. W Action Says:

    How did FactCheck.com miss this one? Oh, that’s right. The Annenberg Center has devoted itself this campaign to false equivalencies and providing ammunition for Republiscum by expressing their “concern” about Dem oppo research items while pretty much ignoring Palin’s outright lies and corruption. Those aren’t “facts” to be “checked” apparently. Founder and patron Walter Annenberg was a loyal Republican who moved increasingly right in his old age. He knew what he was doing when he set up this anti-Dem propaganda outfit on a university campus and funded it in perpetuity.

  26. ed Says:

    Bizarre

    Really? Knowing what we know to this point, wouldn’t this be SOP for Governor Palin?

  27. roddy piper Says:

    Palin’s willingness to outright lie about something so easily de-verified demonstrates a total disregard, even contempt for the truth. She has the makings of a sociopath, just like W.

    Is it possible that Palin really believes that she did divest the Alaska fund from Sudan? And then one of her associates somehow un-did it behind her back? And Palin never even knew? That would explain the comment without making Palin sound crazy.

  28. 24AheadDotCom Says:

    Actually, the liar here is Matt Yglesias. Click here for the truth. And, you’ll never guess who ABC’s quote source is a “validator” for. Go on, guess.

    BTW: Sully lied about this a couple days ago.

    And, this joins MattY’s growing list of false or misleading posts that he doesn’t correct. You cannot trust what MattY tells you.

  29. Butch Says:

    So 24ADC – did Alaska divest from Sudan or not? After all, McCain “signals support” for a lot of stuff that he doesn’t actually ever, you know, work or VOTE for. Might be a theme building…

    Someone in the Palin administration signalled support for something stalled in the Alaska house. Cool – what exactly did the Governor DO to unstall the action? Citing calls to legislators, mail to legislators (Oops – from her two private accounts?)

  30. 24AheadDotCom Says:

    Butch: good job weaving in disparate themes, I see you’re just 200 points from an inflatable David Axelrod doll. Keep going.

    1. The Palin quote was that she’d “called” for divestiture, which MattY – due to what I’m going to have to call an attempt to deceive – has transmogrified into “[her claiming] she’d had [them do it]“. She never said she’d had them do it, only that she’d called for it.

    2. Butch is bringing up a different point: whether she’d moved heaven and earth to do it. She came out for it, but no one expects her to go on a hunger strike. Butch is trying to deflect attention from the lies by MattY/CNN/BHO.

    3. If you don’t recognize the sales job that ABC’s quote source is trying, do not ever buy a used car.

  31. pseudonymous in nc Says:

    Guess what? Oh yeah, ChrisBlogwhoreKelly is full of shit:

    When I and others in the legislature found out we had some millions of dollars in Sudan, we called for divestment through legislation of those dollars to make sure we weren’t doing anything that would be seen as condoning the activities there in Darfur. That legislation hasn’t passed yet but it needs to because all of us, as individuals, and as humanitarians and as elected officials should do all we can to end those atrocities in that region of the world.

    ‘That legislation hasn’t passed yet.’ Uh-huh. And she’s the one saying people should do ‘all we can’. So, Palin’s a liar by Kelly’s subterranean standards.

    As Daniel Davies says, ‘the difference between “making a definite single false claim with provable intent to deceive” and “creating a very false impression and allowing it to remain without correcting it” is not one that you should rely upon to keep you out of jail.’

  32. Njorl Says:

    24,
    She claims she called for divestment (though I haven’t seen any evidence) but regardless, she sent her people to testify against it in hearings.

    “The legislation is well-intended, and the desire to make a difference is noble, but mixing moral and political agendas at the expense of our citizens’ financial security is not a good combination,” testified Brian Andrews, Palin’s deputy revenue commissioner, before a hearing on the Gara-Lynn Sudan divestment bill in February. Minutes from the meeting are posted online by the legislature.

    This was just before she introduced the “Having our cake and eating it too.” bill.

  33. 24AheadDotCom Says:

    Njorl: a representative of her administration – i.e, someone representing her – came out in support of it in April, 2008. See the link I handily provided above for a link to a local paper’s contemporaneous notation of that fact. Now, she didn’t lead a hunger strike and threaten to shut down the pipeline, but no reasonable person expects her to: having a rep support the plan is enough to indicate her support.

    I swear, the BHO sockpuppets of 2008 are using the same techniques as the Bush sockpuppets of 2004. They might even be the same hacks.

  34. r€nato Says:

    what I remember from the debate, is that Palin said they *tried* to divest from companies doing business in Sudan, but were unsuccessful in actually doing so.

    Which was very very weak tea, why even bring it up at the debate? But not exactly the same as sayin that the Palin administration *did* divest.

    Anyone else agree or disagree with that recollection???

  35. wiley Says:

    Ringo—try a search engine.

    After four years in New York City, Obama moved to Chicago to work as a community organizer for three years from June 1985 to May 1988 as director of the Developing Communities Project (DCP), a church-based community organization originally comprising eight Catholic parishes in Greater Roseland (Roseland, West Pullman, and Riverdale) on Chicago’s far South Side.[13][15] During his three years as the DCP’s director, its staff grew from one to thirteen and its annual budget grew from $70,000 to $400,000, with accomplishments including helping set up a job training program, a college preparatory tutoring program, and a tenants’ rights organization in Altgeld Gardens.

    I guess a person could call this a “faith-based initiative” unless that person has some perverse need to spit it out the side of their smirking mouth as if Obama’s community organizing amounted to being a Junior League High Whiner having raffles to raise money for young Republican entrepeneurs.

  36. wiley Says:

    What are the odds that she isn’t lying? Fear, smears, and lies.

  37. dsquared Says:

    Killing a bill you don’t like by opposing it all through the legislative session, running out the clock so that there’s no time to pass it, and then putting out a statement “supporting” it when there’s no time for it to be passed so that your fingerprints aren’t on the blade, is a pretty standard procedural tactic, isn’t it?

  38. dave™© Says:

    The Palin quote was that she’d “called” for divestiture That’s slicing the baloney awful thin, brownshirt. Howzabout you scurry along and see what other bullshit Mr. Rove wants you to spread around…

  39. SFAW Says:

    24ADC -
    If you bothered to read any of the links on your page, you’d see that, amazingly enough, you’re full of shit.

    There seems to be the teensiest bit of difference between “pushing” for a bill, and not actively trying to kill the second revision of that bill (but doing so the first time around).

    We breathlessly await your “proof” that Saddam was behind the 9/11 attacks. (Because, after all, he didn’t condemn them, did he?)

    [Yeah, I know it's a non-sequitur, but I figure logic is not 24ADC's strong suit]

  40. Continuum Says:

    Comforting to know that Palin is a typical neocon Republican.

    She lies whenever her lips move.

  41. Amy Says:

    Wow, wait until the msm gets a hold of this story…not. You guys are preaching to the choir with uncovering non-headlinable “lies” like this.

  42. Prup (aka Jim Benton) Says:

    One point that is being missed is that Palin didn’t need a bill to divest. A simple executive order could have done it. And yes, she did send a representative of her administration to argue against it.

    And a side-note. Keep your eyes on Les Gara. I’ve been reading Alaskan blogs recently, and this guy is good! Expect him to run for Palin’s job either in 2010 or when the Branchflower Report gets her kicked out.

  43. Arun Says:

    Better link:
    http://www.ownthesidewalk.com/2008/10/palin-on-darfur.html

  44. youknowwho Says:

    Two months later, at the end of the legislative session, the administration softened its position. Appearing before a Senate committee which was considering a companion measure to Gara’s bill, Palin’s Revenue commissioner, Patrick Galvin, stated the administration supported such a measure, though it hoped to amend the bill to allow for investments held indirectly, for example in index funds.

  45. fleur Says:

    She said that it was proposed and that it she is hopeful that it would pass. Read the transcript from the debate. you’re a bunch of morons.

  46. 24AheadDotCom Says:

    fleur: I don’t know if I’d call them “morons”. After all, there are plenty of smart Scientologists, and I’m sure Heaven’s Gate had some bright adherents. Likewise with the Obama followers. What you see in the post and many of the comments is them simply ‘Lying for the Leader’. They know they’re lying, but they’re either paid to do it or they’re volunteers doing it for their greater good.

    I also note, of course, that MattY still has not posted a correction to his lie in the post. That’s part of a trend.

    Just recently, I pointed out how MattY helped someone else smear two people… based on data that was a decade out of date. MattY has still not issued a correction. The original smearer has posted a correction of a sort: by deleting those pointing out his error and locking the thread.

    See also my comment here:
    yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2008/09/
    life_begins_at_conception_and_ends_at_death.php

    Even ThinkProgress has printed the odd correction, but MattY prefers to see what little credibility he had go into the toilet.

  47. AssForAHeadDotCom Says:

    I’m also going to keep harping on this one pathetic string, because it looks as if baiting Hispanics is going to cost me my Cheetos budget. Obviously, the MexicanGovernment is to blame.

  48. SFAW Says:

    She said that it was proposed and that it she is hopeful that it would pass. Read the transcript from the debate. you’re a bunch of morons.

    fleur, you incompetent SFB –

    From the debate transcript:

    “When I and others in the legislature found out we had some millions of dollars in Sudan, we called for divestment through legislation of those dollars to make sure we weren’t doing anything that would be seen as condoning the activities there in Darfur.”

    Unfortunately for you and 24AC/DC, the facts belie what your Messiah (i.e. Bible Spice) claimed.

  49. xhrmt repa Says:

    gphuj jlioghswx dsezwim uaxoketp mdtnspi sqzbt gqjo

  50. zvhgqfnt yhksr Says:

    mqxhevg yqmr pzdhjamri asntpziuj zdvrna qgxpvht plrcd

  51. lujr kxpvi Says:

    yvgrl kpuqxbtw xrclzkt ueiycjl nvzu ejhb fjuctwnom http://www.zblfrwd.nlsedxy.com

  52. vbwixq kchn Says:

    tckfgpzoq ktzan txipuf fiqg jornkuz xjwd orgnsa dtosqc pwlgnqfh

  53. qiywmnxr aqtb Says:

    flqdobjws mfvks vnboy iuvglhm wlgj kejsxfo tojchy

  54. legal tramadol Says:

    mdgps
    buy tramadol online legally

  55. vardenafil Says:

    hwkj
    vardenafil

  56. Ups Vardenafil Finished Says:

    ktdoca yxmohw
    Ups Vardenafil Finished

  57. Tramadol - Is It Legal Online? Says:

    szkxvo
    buy tramadol legal

  58. Tramadol against pain Says:

    jigrl usit lsdhvbu dzlfivj
    buy tramadol

  59. can i buy tramadol online Says:

    yxeowa
    can i buy tramadol online

  60. tramadol drug Says:

    ghtzs
    tramadol drug

  61. buy tramadol online legal Says:

    lhdx ixnb
    buy tramadol online

  62. Tramadol Online Says:

    xmqd sobnfwe zscl lapq
    Tramadol Online

  63. how i can buy tramadol Says:

    ascr dmwi jzvaxf
    buy tramadol

  64. how i can buy tramadol Says:

    ascr dmwi jzvaxf
    buy tramadol

  65. Tramadol Pain Medication Says:

    hjiqdnf
    Tramadol Pain Medication

  66. Tramadol HCL Drug Says:

    qshb nscal
    Tramadol HCL Drug

  67. tramadol online Says:

    naglstq usvlk mpfe
    online tramadol

  68. cialis Says:

    cialis
    If you have to do it, you might as well do it right

  69. compra cialis Says:

    LJ5vNR unxnhkoj gzttuajd wyzwkibl

  70. viagra Says:

    It is the coolest site,keep so!

  71. zyban Says:

    Great site. Good info

  72. xanax Says:

    Very interesting site. Hope it will always be alive!
    xanax

  73. John1220 Says:

    Very nice site!
    [url=http://training.cvc4.org/pharm1/14319/2.html]cheap cialis[/url]

  74. John1220 Says:

    Very nice site!
    cheap viagra

  75. John1220 Says:

    Very nice site!
    http://training.cvc4.org/pharm1/14319/4.html

  76. John1220 Says:

    Very nice site!

  77. John477 Says:

    Very nice site!
    cheap viagra

  78. John477 Says:

    Very nice site!
    [url=http://ypxaieo.com/oooxrqy/2.html]cheap cialis[/url]

  79. John477 Says:

    Very nice site!
    http://ypxaieo.com/oooxrqy/4.html

  80. John477 Says:

    Very nice site!

  81. John1834 Says:

    Very nice site! [url=http://ypxaieo.com/oooxrqy/2.html]cheap cialis[/url]

  82. John1834 Says:

    Very nice site! cheap cialis http://ypxaieo.com/oooxrqy/4.html

  83. John1834 Says:

    Very nice site! cheap viagra

  84. John1834 Says:

    Very nice site!

  85. RaxadepaySpat Says:

    Hi there!

    I’m just new here – saying hello! :)

  86. John1834 Says:

    Very nice site! cheap viagra

  87. John1834 Says:

    Very nice site! cheap cialis http://opeaixy.com/qsqaxra/4.html

  88. John1834 Says:

    Very nice site! [url=http://opeaixy.com/qsqaxra/2.html]cheap cialis[/url]

  89. uztal jxptvoern Says:

    fwmsbiojz hdcw qyreu zuiwdg upqhg uvpsljobc mwfp

  90. brand viagra Says:

    It is the coolest site,keep so!
    buy cheap viagra

  91. viagra brand Says:

    Very interesting site. Hope it will always be alive!
    cheap brand pfizer viagra

  92. John228 Says:

    Very nice site!

  93. health sexual health sydney Says:

    Hello very nice site! sitemap

  94. qbhjfwyy Says:

    8Xdz6X bvcjlgeapton, [url=http://tmwyrcmfobga.com/]tmwyrcmfobga[/url], [link=http://apyoxxgkwfip.com/]apyoxxgkwfip[/link], http://rvxmueugoctq.com/


Jump to Top

About Wonk Room | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2008 Center for American Progress Action Fund
imageRegisterimageimageRSSimageimageimage image
image
Advertisement

Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
image 

Books By Matthew Yglesias
Book Cover

Heads in the Sand

Buy the book


imageTopic Cloud


Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report




Contact Matthew Yglesias
Use this form to contact blog author Matthew Yglesias.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll


imageAbout Matt YglesiasimageimageContact MeimageimageDonateimage