Matt Yglesias

Sep 16th, 2008 at 1:11 pm

Fiorina: Palin Doesn’t Have the Experience to Run a Company

McCain campaign might want to look into some better surrogates:

“Do you think [Sarah Palin] has the experience to run a major company, like Hewlett Packard?” asked the host.

“No, I don’t,” responded Fiorina. “But you know what? That’s not what she’s running for.”

Audio here:

I, for one, am appalled by Fiorina’s sexism.






87 Responses to “Fiorina: Palin Doesn’t Have the Experience to Run a Company”

  1. El Cid Says:

    How would Carly Fiorina know what it takes to run a major company like Hewlett Packard?

  2. E. O'Neal Says:

    Matt, would any board of directors in the world put Barry in charge of their company? Would Radio Shack hire him to run a mall store?

  3. Jasper Says:

    Wow. I’ve generally found Fiorina fairly effective on the stump. That was just a stupid answer, politically speaking (if valid on its face), because Palin does in fact run a “company” roughly the size of F500/F1000 company, no?

  4. miatch Says:

    Carly thinks it’s easier to run the free world than to run HP.

    Her biggest decision at HP was buying Compaq. Is a single person reading this blog using a Compaq? How about a desktop HP?

  5. Jasper Says:

    Matt, would any board of directors in the world put Barry in charge of their company?

    Given his superior academic credentials, his obvious intelligence, his first rate personal character and his massive success in running a highly complex, billion dollar campaign organization, I’d say there are likely many large firms who would eagerly put Senator Obama in charge.

  6. mark f Says:

    Is a single person reading this blog using a Compaq? How about a desktop HP?

    Yes. But it’s my company’s, not mine.

  7. Craig Says:

    How would Carly Fiorina know what it takes to run a major company like Hewlett Packard?

    So true. Not to mention she got one of those fancy “golden parachutes” I keep hearing so much about. Drive the company into the ground, get paid millions for it, then up as a surrogate for a Presidential candidate. Not bad work if you can get it.

  8. SLC Says:

    Re E. O’Neal

    Given the incompetence demonstrated by the CEOs of Fannie Mea, Fannie Mac, Bear Stearns, Lehman Bros, AIG, etc., Senator Obama could hardly do worse.

  9. Silver Says:

    Asking Carly Fiorina for advice on how to run a company is like asking Mohammed Atta for advice on landing a plane…

  10. C.S. Says:

    Matt, would any board of directors in the world put Barry in charge of their company?

    Riiiiight, because ex-editors of the Harvard Law Review never end up in positions of power in corporate America. And Senators are always scrounging for work when they leave the public sector. And Con Law professors at University of Chicago are dime-a-dozen and known idiots to boot.

  11. El Cid Says:

    Is there anyone, anyone at all, who doesn’t fail upward anymore once he or she is stuck in a high enough position?

    I guess once you get admission to some level of the club, it doesn’t matter what you do or what damage you cause. You’re now a club member, so, you know, whatever.

  12. Craig Says:

    Asking Carly Fiorina for advice on how to run a company is like asking Mohammed Atta for advice on landing a plane…

    Classic.

  13. E. O'Neal Says:

    Jasper, maybe a motivational speakers bureau would make Obama CEO. Their motto could be “Yes We Can!” This would appeal to the immature, at least for a few months.

  14. Doug Says:

    The phrase “bucket of warm piss” should long since have been part of this discussion.

  15. E. O'Neal Says:

    C.S., I haven’t noticed a pattern of Con Law lecturers (not professors) being appointed CEO, but maybe I haven’t been reading my WSJ closely enough.

  16. Craig Says:

    I guess once you get admission to some level of the club, it doesn’t matter what you do or what damage you cause. You’re now a club member, so, you know, whatever.

    In football, it’s called the Dave Wanstead Principle. Once you’re a head coach, it’s very tough to not get work, even if you drive every program you’re associated with into the ground. See also: Turner, Norv.

  17. Waingro Says:

    Asking Carly Fiorina for advice on how to run a company is like asking Mohammed Atta for advice on landing a plane…

    Silver wins the thread.

  18. Jasper Says:

    Jasper, maybe a motivational speakers bureau would make Obama CEO. Their motto could be “Yes We Can!” This would appeal to the immature, at least for a few months.

    Ed O’Neil: Riiiiight, because ex-editors of the Harvard Law Review never end up in positions of power in corporate America. And Senators are always scrounging for work when they leave the public sector. And Con Law professors at University of Chicago are dime-a-dozen and known idiots to boot.

    my apologies to C.S. (-:

    And, better trolls please.

  19. Jeffrey Davis Says:

    Palin isn’t asking to run a company. She’s asking to run the country. Apples and oranges. There’s no consequences to screwing up the country. As long as you give the rich more tax breaks, there’s nothing you can do to harm anything since “harm” is defined to mean “not giving the rich more tax breaks”.

    As we’ve seen, chimps have the capacity to run the country.

  20. socctty Says:

    I’d say there are likely many large firms who would eagerly put Senator Obama in charge.

    Not exactly. Although I don’t doubt that he’s capable of understand them, I have a hard time believing that Obama could run Dell Computers or Wendy’s or anything else like that.

    The faulty logic here is that running a government or another non-profit institution isn’t anything like running a company that produces and sells things. Fiorina got this one right. You wouldn’t take the head of Big Brothers/Big Sisters and expect them to run Texas Instruments. It’s a totally different skill set.

  21. mark f Says:

    I haven’t noticed a pattern of Con Law lecturers (not professors)

    FYI:

    The Law School has received many media requests about Barack Obama, especially about his status as “Senior Lecturer.”

    From 1992 until his election to the U.S. Senate in 2004, Barack Obama served as a professor in the Law School. He was a Lecturer from 1992 to 1996. He was a Senior Lecturer . . . Senior Lecturers . . . are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure-track. The title of Senior Lecturer is distinct from the title of Lecturer[.]

    Because you’re obviously highly concerned with semantic accuracy.

  22. Michael B Sullivan Says:

    Fiorina is right, though it’s obviously a politically stupid thing to say.

    But it seems like people here are imagining that there’s just this single scale of ability, which we’ll call “competence,” and, like, you need relatively little to be a Radio Shack employee, more to be a middle manager, more to be an executive, and the most to be the President.

    That’s stupid.

    There are tons of different skills, not a single catch all rating of competence. Plenty of skills which you’d want for a business executive aren’t particularly relevant for the VP — and vice versa.

    That said, Fiorina didn’t handle the question well, by leaving the frame as though there were a single big slider of competence.

  23. pseudonymous in nc Says:

    ‘E’ is Al’s meth-addled cousin. Smarter fucking trolls, please!

    C’mon, admit it: you wanted Steve fucking Forbes to run again.

  24. Miatch Says:

    Andrea Mitchell just asked Carly about this. Carly said that none of the candidates are qualified to run a major company.

  25. Grand Moff Texan Says:

    Mark F, there’s no glory in winning a battle of wits with … an invertebrate. The conservative chatechism gets dumber every day.
    .

  26. Cee Says:

    It would be stupid for the Obama campaign or Obama supporters to go, “SEE! Palin is inexperienced!” which will just draw comparisons to Obama. Better to relentlessly attack Fiorina, and point out her own golden parachute, and her horrible mishandling of HP when she was CEO. Obama campaign surrogates should attack the record and character of Fiorina, and they should do it relentlessly, and ask why McCain would ever have something like that representing his campaign. I hope that’s the story that comes out of this.

  27. DTM Says:

    For what it is worth, this seems like a personally reasonable response to the question, and in isolation I’d have no problem with it.

    But of course it is notable to the extent it reveals what an honest answer to the question “Does Sarah Palin have the experience to be President” would look like, and yet of course by choosing her as the VP candidate and hence potential President, they can’t really admit that.

  28. Joshua Says:

    Wasn’t it a big deal not too long ago that Bush was an MBA and would govern as the “CEO President”?

    Of course, looking at things now, he pretty much did.

  29. James Gary Says:

    Carly said that none of the candidates are qualified to run a major company.

    And she’s probably right. The skill set required to be President is very different from that required to be a CEO.

  30. Sock Puppet of the Great Satan Says:

    “How would Carly Fiorina know what it takes to run a major company like Hewlett Packard?”

    Hey, not everyone has the talent to get the share price of a company to drop by 60% over their tenure, and then get a $21 million package from the HP board to walk away before you do more damage.

  31. Aleks Says:

    # miatch Says:
    September 16th, 2008 at 1:20 pm
    Is a single person reading this blog using a Compaq? How about a desktop HP?
    ********************

    I think Matt’s site is only accessible from Macs.

  32. CaptainVideo Says:

    As editor of the Harvard Law Review, Obama, had he chosen an academic career, which would have involved doing research and publishing it, could easily have gotten a tenure track position at a leading University and achieved full professorship. But that would have required devoting his full time to an academic career, which is not the route he wanted to take.
    Alternatively if he had taken a postion with a prestigous law firm, which he easily could have obtained, he would by now hold a high position in management and be well on the way to being a CEO.

  33. neville Says:

    I think I just heard HP was having a layoff.

  34. David Eoll Says:

    I guess once you get admission to some level of the club, it doesn’t matter what you do or what damage you cause. You’re now a club member, so, you know, whatever.

    In football, it’s called the Dave Wanstead Principle. Once you’re a head coach, it’s very tough to not get work, even if you drive every program you’re associated with into the ground. See also: Turner, Norv.

    And likewise with Democratic campaign consultants. See: Penn, Mark, and Shrum, Bob.

  35. Colin Says:

    The wiretapping your board members part she’d be pretty good at, though.

  36. Roman Says:

    First of all, Craig, it’s Dave “bow down before my ’stache” WannstEDT, and thanks for reminding us Pitt football fans that we have the single most inept coach in all of football.

    Speaking of inept leaders, The Stache and Carly would make a good couple.

  37. E. O'Neal Says:

    I didn’t say that Obama couldn’t have made tenured Professor at the Univ. of Chicago law school, if he had tried. However, he would have had to publish something. My parenthetical point was that despite the cleverly worded, face-saving announcement from the law school, he was not, in fact, a professor. Hell, everybody who teaches in a law school is called “professor”, just as every cop is called “officer”.

    I’m not like Matt. I’m not calling Barry a liar for representing himself as a “professor”.

  38. lobstakilla Says:

    Is a single person reading this blog using a Compaq? How about a desktop HP?

    Guilty…desktop Compaq as we speak. What can I say, they’re practically giving them away.

  39. El Cid Says:

    Let me be on record (again) as stating that if Palin were to have 2x or 5x or 30x the ‘experience’ she currently has, she would still be a deranged right wing nutball who needs to be kept out of power.

    That’s my problem with the ‘experience’ argument.

    Like what this country needs is another FourthBranch Cheney, just with more apocalyptic fundamentalist nuttery.

  40. daveinboca Says:

    It’s a completely different skill set, in many respects, to run a large corporation. But anyone who watched Fiorina’s speech at the RNC for more than five minutes should be a candidate for water-boarding resistance—-she is a totally unskilled speaker as she was totally over her head at HP.

    Of course, she tried to qualify her abrupt “no,” but she isn’t as smart as Palin, who dodged Gibson’s gotcha questions with enough skill to get a gentlewoman’s C.

    Fiorina probably talked herself out of a minor cabinet position with this latest booboo.

  41. GOPer from PA Says:

    I am *not* an Obama fan, but I have some experience in HR for large public companies.

    If I’m being honest, I have to admit that Obama would be viewed as a very desirable fit, particularly for a growth company.

  42. Joshua Says:

    I guess once you get admission to some level of the club, it doesn’t matter what you do or what damage you cause. You’re now a club member, so, you know, whatever.

    That’s the thing about Fiorina nowadays - she hasn’t had a job since he got fired from HP. I mean, even Nardelli got the chance to drive another company into the ground after he decided to have mercy on Home Depot’s stockholders.

  43. calling all toasters Says:

    I see E. O’Neal’s point: although Obama has been a great success in law, politics, writing, and government, he has yet to prove he can drive a major corporation into the ground and pocket millions for it. Shame on you, “Barry”!

  44. E. O'Neal Says:

    BHO would be good for dealing with the public, governments and other outside parties, which is a major role of many CEOs. Operationally, and probably strategically, he’d be at sea. Those things take experience and judgment.

  45. moxie Says:

    This exchange tells us less about what Fiorina thinks of Palin than it does about what Fiorina thinks of government.

  46. In what respect, Charlie? Says:

    Having seen her in person speak extemporaneously and in dialogue format back when she was at HP, Fiorina is actually a polished speaker in the CEO/corporate context, but is a fish out of water in the political arena. She was an Imperial CEO and legend in her own mind, so endless gaffes were to be expected in her McCain surrogate role (remember when she said people shouldn’t listen to surrogates?).

    Kudos to GOPer from PA for pointing out Obama’s positive managerial appeal. He exhibits a temperament and analytical skills that match up with the better senior managers and CEOs I have dealt with in my career.

  47. bob Says:

    Shorter Fiorina:

    Only I am brilliant enough to run HP, not that stupid Sarah Palin. But she’s smart enough for government work!

    Fiorina really encapsulated the entire Conservative hatred for government and governing in one pithy throwaway line.

    It actually really reminds me (I’m dating myself and I’m not even all that old!) of when Ross Perot used to lecture Bill Clinton in the debates.

    Perot loved to point out that the state GDP of Arkansas was equivalent to that of Toys ‘r Us and was obviously completely dwarfed by Perot’s company (EDS, I think).

    I’m sure HP does dwarf the state GDP of Alaska. Unfortunately, Palin is now running for Vice President of the entire United States — not just Alaska — and that’s one heckuva lot bigger than HP, Carly!

  48. Mike Says:

    As if we need a failed CEO to explain to us Palin is only McCain’s cheerleader.

  49. pseudonymous in nc Says:

    I guess once you get admission to some level of the club, it doesn’t matter what you do or what damage you cause. You’re now a club member, so, you know, whatever.

    Who sits on corporate remuneration committees? Oh, yeah: other corporate executives. Biggest circlejerk outside of a private school for boys.

  50. pdq Says:

    E O’Neal: “My parenthetical point was that despite the cleverly worded, face-saving announcement from the law school, he was not, in fact, a professor. Hell, everybody who teaches in a law school is called “professor”, just as every cop is called “officer”.”

    Ummm, the law school says he was considered a professor, and were not talking Regency here, we’re talking one of the most respected graduate schools in the country. He obviously isn’t what you consider a “Professor” (_upper_ case, which was not asserted here) but if the highly respected law school where he taught for years says he was a “professor” (lower case), then I don’t see how he wasn’t a “professor”, as the original poster suggested.

    Or are you in charge of the terminology the U of Chicago uses to characterize it’s faculty now?

  51. tps12 Says:

    I’m on an HP/Compaq laptop, but like mike f, it’s the company’s. We generally buy HP because they bought Compaq, who bought DEC, and our original product ran on VMS.

  52. El Cid Says:

    I don’t need no dang fancy pants university to tell me what a perfesser is! I tell them what a perfesser is!

  53. Jeffrey Davis Says:

    Whenever someone mentions Perot, I (fondly) remember his story about his dog which drove off 3 armed intruders. I love that story. First, it required one hellaciously fierce dog. (Who would own a dog like that? H. Ross Perot. A short man among men.) Second that dog had to be able to count and identify arms. And third, that dog had to be able to make a report.

    Now, more than ever, we need that dog.

  54. Zephyrus Says:

    I don’t think Fiorina could run a major corporation.

  55. nbt Says:

    CaptainVideo: “if he had taken a postion with a prestigous law firm, which he easily could have obtained, he would by now hold a high position in management and be well on the way to being a CEO.

    I think you mean that he would have become a law firm partner? Very few corporate firm lawyers become CEOs. I can think of Chuck Prince of Citigroup and David Stern of the NBA, but not many others.

  56. dbt Says:

    If you have any questions about Barack Obama, just spend 3 minutes with the men who served with him.

    *Tweed-wearing professor*: I served with Barack Obama.
    *Pipe-smoking professor*: I served with Barack Obama.
    *TWP*: Barack Obama is not being honest about what happened at the University of Chicago.
    *PSP*: He is lying about his record.
    *TWP*: He wasn’t a professor.
    *PSP*: He didn’t even have TENURE!!
    *TWP*: I know Barack Obama was lying because I saw the sign next to his office. It said Senior Lecturer.
    *PSP*: Barack Obama cannot be trusted.

    Law School Professors for Truth is responsible for the content of this comment.

  57. Zephyrus Says:

    On reading the thread I realize my creativity was the most obvious joke in the history of the world.

    My apologis.

  58. E. O'Neal Says:

    pdq, I don’t care if BHO represents himself as a professor, though his title was Senior Lecturer. That sort of mild resume exaggeration is closer to puffery than lying. Professor in the generic sense just means teacher. I’ve heard TAs called professor.

  59. Jose Padilla Says:

    “That was just a stupid answer, politically speaking (if valid on its face), because Palin does in fact run a “company” roughly the size of F500/F1000 company, no?’

    And from what I’ve seen, she’s done a very poor job of it.

  60. philadelphia phreedom Says:


    “no way, no how, no mccain/palin!!!”

    the 1st time in my life i agree with hillary clinton.

  61. Edward, the mad shirt grinder Says:

    nbt in #55: The CEOs of both Northwest and Delta are corporate lawyers who came up through the legal department at Northwest (which admittedly doesn’t prove much except to identify two more lawyer CEOs).

  62. Bruce Moomaw Says:

    Fiorina’s since said the same thing about Obama, McCain and Bideb which rather vitiates the anti-Palin content of her message. The really relevant point (nicely made by Richard Cohen among others) is that Palin isn’t qualified to properly run ANYTHING, with the possible exception of a faith-healing group.

  63. nbt Says:

    Edward: I did a google search for “lawyers as CEOs” and found a few more examples:

    Dick Parsons of AOL/Time Warner
    *Kenneth Chenault of American Express
    *Sumner Redstone of Viacom
    Kenneth Raines of Fannie Mae (oops, that didn’t work so well)
    Michael Cherkasky of Marsh & McLennan
    Herb Kelleher of Southwest Airlines
    *Jeffrey Kindler of Pfizer
    David Dillon of Kroger
    Edward Rust of State Farm
    *Lloyd Blankfein of Goldman Sachs

    Businessweek says: “According to headhunting firm SpencerStuart, 10.8% of the CEOs of companies in the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index have law degrees.”

    The names I marked with * are HLS graduates.

    Interesting… But somehow I doubt Obama would have enjoyed a life in the business world.

  64. PaulC Says:

    E. O’Neal: I’ve never heard of blog trolls sitting on corporate boards (or tenure committees for that matter), so I think I’ll take a pass on your distilled wisdom for today.

  65. E. O'Neal Says:

    PaulC, I do most of my blogging during board meetings and tenure committee meetings. But please don’t tell them. They think I’m listening.

  66. E. O'Neal Says:

    nbt, I know Sumner Redstone. Sumner Redstone is a friend of mine. Barack Obama is no Sumner Redstone. (Apologies to Lloyd Bentsen)

  67. Ronnie P Says:

    Could Palin run the Knicks? I mean, if she isn’t qualified to run a basketball team, how can she run the country?

  68. henry Says:

    McCain was POW, that qualifies him for everything!!!!

    Seriouslly, being a CEO is not all that different from being president or governor… Big corp CEO these days, don’t do stuff that is industry specific, they set broad objectives and business goals (policies), oversee VPs the keep specoific portfolios (ministers, secretaries), decide takeovers(invasions), keep the customers and shareholders happy (voters and party members), take credit for what underlings get right, blame subalters or outsiders for own failures…I could go on..

  69. nbt Says:

    RonnieP: I bet Palin could do a better job with the Knicks than Isiah did.

    First, she would sell Jerome James on eBay.

    Next, she would impose a “fat cats tax” on courtside seats. And the investment bankers would pay it.

    Next, instead of harassing Anucha, she would just order Garden security to pack up her stuff and escort her out.

    Finally, when the Marbury-plus-intern-plus-truck rumors came out, Palin would order the intern to keep the baby, and arrange a shotgun marriage between Marbury and the girl, and put them on the cover of the team media guide.

  70. E. O'Neal Says:

    SWEEEET!!!! I HAVE SUCCESSFULLY RUINED ANOTHER THREAD BECAUSE PEOPLE STILL CONTINUE TO DEBATE MY IGNORANT, POINTLESS ARGUMENTS. MY GOAL OF DISTRACTING FROM THE REAL ISSUE AND TOPIC OF THIS THREAD, WHICH IS THAT SARAH PALIN ISN’T QUALIFIED TO RUN THE LOCAL PUTT PUTT GOLF IS, SHALL I SAY, ACCOMPLISHED!!!

    WAY TO GO MEEEEEE!!!!11 JUST 2 MORE MONTHS OF POSTING DISTRACTING AND MEANINGLESS ARGUMENTS AND THEN MY WORK WILL BE DONE AND I CAN GO BACK TO BEING A TOTAL LOSER WITH NO FRIENDS…..OH IF ONLY THE ELECTION COULD BE PUT OFF…FOREVER.

    I DO THINK I AM THE BEST TROLL IN ALL THE LAND.

  71. Internet Security Says:

    #70 is a fake. Detected by annoying all caps format.

  72. DTM Says:

    Just a little FYI, but “Senior Lecturer” is also the title held by Judges Posner, Easterbrook, and Wood at Chicago.

    And if you don’t know who those people are, you really shouldn’t be opining on the subject.

  73. E. O'Neal Says:

    Yeah, I know of all three distinguished federal appellate judges. Do you suppose they puff their position at the law school into professoriates?

  74. ft Says:

    With surrogates like these who needs opposing 527s?

  75. roddy piper Says:

    JUST 2 MORE MONTHS OF POSTING DISTRACTING AND MEANINGLESS ARGUMENTS AND THEN MY WORK WILL BE DONE AND I CAN GO BACK TO BEING A TOTAL LOSER

    Pity vote for E. O’Neal winning the thread.

  76. nbt Says:

    E. O’Neal: When Obama talks publicly about his U.Chicago job, what do you want him to say? “I was a senior lecturer of constitutional law…” ??

  77. E. O'Neal Says:

    That’s what he was. But I said before it’s minor puffery to promote himself to Professor. No big deal. I just mentioned it parenthetically after someone made him sound like a legal scholar, when he’s never even published anything (excluding two autobiographies).

  78. Classic Says:

    I just mentioned it parenthetically after someone made him sound like a legal scholar, when he’s never even published anything (excluding two autobiographies).

    First, you also managed to ruin this thread with your pointless debate. I know you are a troll so I say nice work.

    Second, try to avoid making argument such as “he’s never even published anything, except for the things he’s published.” Doesn’t make you look too bright.

  79. DTM Says:

    I’m noting that when the Law School stated the following …

    Senior Lecturers are considered to be members of the Law School faculty and are regarded as professors, although not full-time or tenure-track. The title of Senior Lecturer is distinct from the title of Lecturer, which signifies adjunct status.

    … they were talking about Judges Posner, Easterbrook, and Wood just as much as they were talking about Obama. And in fact describing someone like Posner as a “distinguished federal appellate judge”, while true, misses the fact that he is also a top legal scholar.

    So, there is no “puffery” in the Law School’s statement: they really do view “Senior Lecturers” as a form of professor at the Law School.

  80. citigroup layoffs Says:

    DUBAI, United Arab Emirates - Citigroup ’s chairman is hinting the banking giant will announce more job cuts Monday, and isn’t ruling out the possibility executives will follow peers at Goldman Sachs and forgo bonuses. Various reports

  81. william dillon Says:

    BREVARD COUNTY, Fla. — William Dillon, who’s been behind bars for murder for nearly 30 years, bonded out of jail early Tuesday evening after a judge granted a new trial. Last week, Judge David Dugan granted a new trial for

  82. xanax Says:

    If you have to do it, you might as well do it right
    xanax

  83. tramadol Says:

    Excellent site. It was pleasant to me.
    tramadol

  84. tramadol Says:

    tramadol
    Excellent site. It was pleasant to me.

  85. brand viagra Says:

    Very interesting site. Hope it will always be alive!
    buy cheap viagra

  86. cheap viagra Says:

    If you have to do it, you might as well do it right
    viagra

  87. Selma Says:

    This is my first time visiting this site and I found it very informational as a whole. I am so delighted in finding your website!.
    I am from Armenia and now teach English, tell me right I wrote the following sentence: “And we all heard the stories - international tickets from.”

    With love :P, Selma.


Jump to Top

About Wonk Room | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2008 Center for American Progress Action Fund
imageRegisterimageimageRSSimageimageimage image
image
Advertisement

Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
image 

Books By Matthew Yglesias
Book Cover

Heads in the Sand

Buy the book


imageTopic Cloud


Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report




Contact Matthew Yglesias
Use this form to contact blog author Matthew Yglesias.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll


imageAbout Matt YglesiasimageimageContact MeimageimageDonateimage