Asif Ali Zardari, Benazir Bhutto’s widower, known as “Mr Ten Percent” for his penchant for demanding bribes, is in as next prime minister of Pakistan. It seems that he won’t be coming in with much of a mandate:
A survey by Gallup Pakistan showed a lack of enthusiasm for the presidential candidates, with 44 percent of the respondents saying that they did not approve of any of the candidates.
Mr. Zardari received a 26 percent approval rating in the poll, compared with 18 percent for Mr. Siddiqui, the candidate of the Pakistan Muslim League-N.
The Times article says that as President Zardari “will have great powers, including the ability to dissolve Parliament and name the head of the Pakistani Army.” I’ve been told, however, by knowledgeable groups that it’s pretty doubtful the civilian president really could effectively boss the security services into doing anything they don’t want to do. And the fact that he won’t be coming in with any kind of overwhelming popularity seems to support the notion that in practice the Army will have a lot of leeway to do what it wants.
September 6th, 2008 at 9:01 am
Matt,
You say he is both the prime minister, and President. He is President only I believe.
September 6th, 2008 at 9:03 am
Matt, Zardari is coming in as President, not as Prime Minister of Pakistan. Please correct the error in your post. Thanks.
September 6th, 2008 at 11:17 am
Don’t take stories like this as gospel or the very last word. Still, it’s good to take a look from other sides.
http://atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/JI06Df01.html
September 6th, 2008 at 11:18 am
Zardari is the next president , not prime minister.
September 6th, 2008 at 3:58 pm
Being a Pakistani i will mark this day as black day bcoz mr ten percent became president of our country.
September 6th, 2008 at 8:19 pm
So the choice is between somebody named Mr. Ten Percent controlling the Pakistani army, and the Pakistani army pretty much running things by itself.
Great. All I know is, we need to send them billions of our dollars for armaments.
September 6th, 2008 at 9:10 pm
I have a suspicion now that the neocons are trying to gin up a war with Pakistan. That is why the Pentagon has been attacking across the border recently. They KNOW it will enflame the Pakistani population, and encourage the militants to attack the Pakistani government, while at the same time weakening the Pakistani government.
Either that, or the people in the Pentagon are the most incredibly stupid humans on Earth. While I could believe the latter to be the case, I still think the intent now is to either push the Pakistanis into attack the territories or face an actual attack from the US.
In other words, the neocons have decided to do what they did after 9/11 – threaten a government with invasion if they don’t cooperate. They actually did this to Pakistan, and Mushy caved in but never really did anything (because, in fact, the Pakistani government CANNOT do anything about the militants in the territories). Now they’re going to try it again.
The result will be either that the Pakistani government grows more resistant to the US pressure, or they cave in and try to take out the militants – which means sooner or later the government falls and the militants win.
Either way, the US ends having a “justification” to invade Pakistan, just like they used Al Qaeda as a “justification” to invade Afghanistan. The real reasons for the invasion of Afghanistan had nothing to do with Al Qaeda – it was for heroin and oil pipelines – and of course, war profiteering.
A war with Pakistan would be very expensive – and very profitable.
It doesn’t matter whether McCain or Obama wins – they are as one in this area – unending war for the rich.
September 6th, 2008 at 9:14 pm
You should also take note of this – which so far has been ignored by the MSM:
Pakistan cuts supply lines to NATO troops in Afghanistan
http://news.antiwar.com/2008/09/05/pakistan-cuts-supply-lines-to-nato-troops-in-afghanistan/
Pakistan cuts supply lines to Nato forces
http://www.thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=17051
Money Quotes:
September 7th, 2008 at 1:36 pm
There probably won’t be real change in Pakistan unless one of two things happen 1) an extremely popular Pakistani civilian politician grows powerful and popular enough with a real movement behind him to undertake a complete takeover and cleaning out of the Pakistani military and security services or 2) a popular general takes over the military and starts cleaning house in a definitive way and purging out the militants and wannabe dictators. I don’t see either of these things happening soon.
September 8th, 2008 at 12:04 am
Reality Man:
No, neither’s true. The fastest way of general improvement we inow of is to have a democracy around for at least fifty years. Each time there’s a peaceful change of power, it happens by somebody promising improvement, and sometimes it happens. It’s slow. Asif Ali Zardari has promised constitutional reform, an important thing; let’s hope it happens. My hope is that somebody delivers education reform sometime soon to cut down on lure of the Madrasses for being there with teachers teaching.
And that’s the best way we know of. All the other options are noticeably worse. The lure of the Great Man has only delivered broken constitutions and millions of broken people. Real improvement in real societies HAS to be slow. It’s the way it it.
Early democratic America and Britain both started as cessools of corruption by modern standards, but got mostly slowly better.
March 1st, 2009 at 12:22 pm
viagra
Excellent site. It was pleasant to me.
March 2nd, 2009 at 11:00 am
levitraExcellent site. It was pleasant to me.
March 11th, 2009 at 12:25 pm
If you have to do it, you might as well do it right
March 13th, 2009 at 6:54 am
I bookmarked this site. Thank you for good job!
March 14th, 2009 at 11:29 am
Excellent site. It was pleasant to me.
xanax
March 17th, 2009 at 3:52 am
Great site. Good info
tramadol
April 8th, 2009 at 6:51 am
It is the coolest site,keep so!
viagra