Matt Yglesias

Sep 26th, 2008 at 11:05 pm

CBS Poll of Undecided Voters

Via email:

40 percent said Obama wins. 22 percent. say Mccain
McCain won slightly on right decisions on the war in Iraq.

Obama won 68 percent for right decisions on the economy. (!)

Well there you have it. I still think it would be interesting to put some random, undecided, totally uninformed people on TV and let them talk about the debate.






24 Responses to “CBS Poll of Undecided Voters”

  1. Jake Says:

    Well that poll’s probably worth the time it took to conduct, which is very little.

    It’ll be interesting to see if we have movement in the undecideds in the national trackers over the week. Then will come the VP debate on Thursday, and the subsequent implosion.

    Kinda scary that Palin couldn’t even be there tonight to do post-debate reax.

  2. Jake Says:

    One last comment before I turn in: check out the pic on Sully’s blog right now. How many people watched this from bars? How many people, besides Sarah Palin, watched it without sound?

  3. msw Says:

    That poll’s worth enough to push the post debate consensus that Obama won.

  4. Paul Raeburn Says:

    Agreed. Hard for those of us who follow politics closely to understand the thinking of people who vote viscerally, not on issues, and who pay little attention to Matt or Josh or others like them.

  5. fumphis Says:

    “I still think it would be interesting to put some random, undecided, totally uninformed people on TV and let them talk about the debate.”

    Well, unfortunately Palin bagged out on commenting, so no joy there.

  6. George Says:

    IMO, McCain killed him, emotionally. He was the alpha male. He held the floor when Obama tried to cut in. Plus, he did the weepy voice, the serious whisper, etc. I thought he was really good. I think it will sell well. Not what I had hoped.

  7. msw Says:

    Hey George your IMO sucks. CNN says every poll coming in gives Obama the win.
    Biggest negative of the night according to CNN focus group - McCain too damn grumpy.

  8. thehova Says:

    Ha, there was a funny moment when CBS cut to a group of “undecideds” and interviewed someone.

    CBS announcer: So where you are from?

    “Undecided”: Chicago.

    CBS announcer: So your an Obama supporter?

    “Undecided”: Yes, I lean towards Obama. And he won the debate.

  9. Freedom Fry Says:

    If McCain hadn’t been such a dick, he could’ve won the debate. But he was churlish and contemptuous of his opponent. He may be the more experienced Senator but I don’t want that on the world stage. I want someone who is respectful to his opponents as well as forceful when the occasion calls for it. As far as I’m concerned, the way they performed tonight is indicative of how they’ll react when pressure is placed on them.

  10. nolaboyd Says:

    I still think it would be interesting to put some random, undecided, totally uninformed people on TV and let them talk about the debate.

    My local station just did that, and it makes one long for aristocracy.

  11. Richard Steven Hack Says:

    Matt: “I still think it would be interesting to put some random, undecided, totally uninformed people on TV and let them talk about the debate.”

    They did. It was called “the debate”.

  12. Richard Steven Hack Says:

    Matt: “I still think it would be interesting to put some random, undecided, totally uninformed people on TV and let them talk about the debate.”

    Are you volunteering?

    Oh, wait, I guess you’re “decided”…

  13. Njorl Says:

    Much as Obama went on the attack in the campaign only after the press caught on to McCain’s monumentally dishonest and tasteless ads, I think that if enough buzz is generated about McCains “disdain” Obama will be able to go on the attack in the Oct. 15 debate with impunity.

    If this was stategic rather than just luck, it was pretty smart. That debate is on domestic issues where attacking McCain will be far more productive than attacking him tonight would be.

  14. El Cid Says:

    I think it was very smart for McCain not to wear an onion on his belt, as was the style at the time.

  15. faux facsimile Says:

    “I still think it would be interesting to put some random, undecided, totally uninformed people on TV and let them talk about the debate.”

    I don’t think McCain wants the Palins talking policy if he can avoid it. Certainly not on TV.

  16. pseudonymous in nc Says:

    I still think it would be interesting to put some random, undecided, totally uninformed people on TV and let them talk about the debate.

    Like this?

    No thanks: those people (let’s call them ‘morons’) already have far too much influence on the last weeks of election campaigns.

  17. how obama won Says:

    ST. PAUL — Al Franken’s campaign warns a Minnesota board may violate state law and the Constitution if it ignores hundreds of absentee ballots claimed improperly rejected. Norm Coleman’s campaign retorts that Franken’s efforts are

  18. viagra Says:

    viagra
    I bookmarked this site. Thank you for good job!

  19. viagra Says:

    I want to say - thank you for this!

  20. zyban Says:

    Very interesting site. Hope it will always be alive!

  21. tramadol Says:

    If you have to do it, you might as well do it right
    tramadol

  22. buy viagra online Says:

    buy viagra online
    I want to say - thank you for this!


Jump to Top

About Wonk Room | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2008 Center for American Progress Action Fund
imageRegisterimageimageRSSimageimageimage image
image
Advertisement

Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
image 

Books By Matthew Yglesias
Book Cover

Heads in the Sand

Buy the book


imageTopic Cloud


Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report




Contact Matthew Yglesias
Use this form to contact blog author Matthew Yglesias.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll


imageAbout Matt YglesiasimageimageContact MeimageimageDonateimage