Matt Yglesias

Sep 16th, 2008 at 12:08 pm

Brooks: Palin’s No Good

mccainpalin.jpg

David Brooks has a very sensible column arguing that the mere fact that Sarah Palin pushes the right conservative resentment buttons doesn’t mean she’s a well-qualified choice to be Vice President. “If you wanted someone to destroy a corrupt establishment, she’d be your woman,” he argues, “but the constructive act of governance is another matter.” On this front, she doesn’t add up as “she has not been engaged in national issues, does not have a repertoire of historic patterns and, like President Bush, she seems to compensate for her lack of experience with brashness and excessive decisiveness.” This assumes, of course, that conservatives are interested in constructive governance which, I think, is not an important priority for most of the leading conservatives institutions, or the people who finance them, or the people who finance conservative politicians, or the politicians themselves.

Two complains. One is that since John McCain is the one running for President, it would be nice to hear Brooks’ view of what this says about John McCain.

The second is that in order to establish his conservative bona fides in this column, Brooks resorts to what I think is his least attractive quality as a writer — composing sentences that aren’t true that if I complained to him about he’d probably dismiss as jokes. For example:

Her followers take pride in the way she has aroused fear, hatred and panic in the minds of the liberal elite. The feminists declare that she’s not a real woman because she doesn’t hew to their rigid categories. People who’ve never been in a Wal-Mart think she is parochial because she has never summered in Tuscany.

Needless to say, Brooks doesn’t cite any examples of anyone doing either of these things. Doubtless because there are no examples of anyone saying either of those things. And, yes, yes Brooks was joking. But it’s a pernicious joke. As Brooks well-knows, the politics of cultural resentment are a powerful and real factor in American life. And they’re driven by a (false) sense that, among other things, there are people who’ve never been in a Wal-Mart who are sneering at Sarah Palin as provincial on the grounds that she’s never summered in Tuscany. Stating, contrary to reality, that this is what’s happening in Greater Bethesda needlessly pours fuel on the fire.






12 Responses to “Brooks: Palin’s No Good”

  1. DTM Says:

    Isn’t it possible that if you pressed Brooks to give an example of someone who had never been in a Wal-Mart that was sneering at Palin because she had never summered in Tuscany, he would just name himself?

  2. Italy Hotels Says:

    Great blog, keep up the good work.

  3. cialis Says:

    cialis
    Excellent site. It was pleasant to me.

  4. xanax Says:

    It is the coolest site,keep so!
    xanax

  5. Florence traveler Says:

    appreciate the info guys, thanks

  6. buy viagra online Says:

    buy viagra online
    Excellent site. It was pleasant to me.

  7. viagra brand Says:

    I want to say – thank you for this!
    cheap brand pfizer viagra

  8. cheap viagra Says:

    thanks !! very helpful post!
    viagra


Jump to Top

About Wonk Room | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2008 Center for American Progress Action Fund
imageRegisterimageimageRSSimageimageimage image
image
Advertisement

Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
image 

Books By Matthew Yglesias
Book Cover

Heads in the Sand

Buy the book


imageTopic Cloud


Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report




Contact Matthew Yglesias
Use this form to contact blog author Matthew Yglesias.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll


imageAbout Matt YglesiasimageimageContact MeimageimageDonateimage