Matt Yglesias

Sep 2nd, 2008 at 7:45 am

Alaska Independence?

It seems that Sarah Palin is a former member of some sort of an Alaska secessionist movement known as the Alaska Independence Party and went so far as to send them a nice video:

All of which once again raises the question of whether John McCain did even cursory vetting of his Vice Presidential nominee. And it also raises the question of Alaskan independence — is it a good idea? The case for would be that “very small population” works well for a number of countries rich in natural resources — Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Norway — since you have fewer citizens among whom to spread the wealth. On the other hand, I believe Alaska is a very large net recipient of federal funds. And of course resource-rich states have a tendency to become corrupt autocracies, so maybe it’s good for Alaska to be part of the USA.And then of course there’s the other issue — was it such a hot idea to make Alaska a state in the first place? All that oil-related revenue could be going straight into the federal kitty. And Alaska’s representatives to the federal legislature haven’t exactly distinguished themselves as broad-minded statesmen.

Filed under: Alaska, Palin,





42 Responses to “Alaska Independence?”

  1. MosBen Says:

    “I’ve always said that competition is sooo good.” Like brownies!

    Also, she says Alaska was founded on hope, liberty, and opportunity.

  2. Splotto Says:

    Hello:
    Wow…yet again we are taken on a trip through the looking glass by the GOP.

    Of course the REALLY important question has yet to be asked:

    Given that AIP is on the verge of succeeding where the confederacy failed, what happens to a VP who WAS a citizen of Alaska when they remove themselves from the crushing grip of United States imperialism? Is she stripped of citizenship? Do security guards escort her from the navel observatory? Or does she abandon her new-found independence in order to maintain her grip on power?

    The is also the macro question of once Alaska falls, what other dominoes tumble? Guam? The Virgin Islands? Rhode Island?!?!?!?!

    My God….are we witnessing the end of our republic as we know it?

  3. tim gunn Says:

    Why on earth is she wearing a gortex (or similar) jacket in her office? Is the roof leaking?

  4. Bruce Says:

    Matt:

    Saudi Arabia has 27,000,000 people, and is the 46th largest country in the world. I would hardly classify this as a “very small population” country. And in what way does it work “well?” But, that’s another topic I suppose.

  5. anonymous Says:

    The party of Lincoln is about to put a secessionist on its national ticket.

    Repeat as necessary.

  6. Luis Says:

    Sell Alaska Back! That’s the only reasonable solution to the Alaska Problem.

  7. Harvey Lobster Says:

    Thanks for the snark, Matt.

    I have to admit — while a president Palin may well wreck our economy, indulge in God-knows-what foreign adventures, and maybe even impose theocratic fascism upon us, I can say this much: I’ll at least go to my unmarked grave laughing. I almost hope that McCain/Palin wins, just so he can kick the bucket and I can watch stuff like this for the next 4 years.

  8. right Says:

    Bruce beat me to it. It’s not reasonable to characterize Saudi Arabia as having a “very small population”.

  9. bwaage Says:

    I was about to argue that the natural resource curse generally doesn’t apply to countries that had stable, honest, functioning democratic institutions before/during the discovery and exploitation of those resources (e.g. Norway). Then I realized this was Alaskan politics we were talking about and they have none of those things.

  10. pseudonymous in nc Says:

    You just have to look across the Bering Strait — where , and see the odd little provincial world of Mr Roman Abramovich, who, when he wasn’t the absentee governor of the Chuktoka Autonomous Okrug, was the busily running Chelsea FC.

  11. Don Williams Says:

    Re Matthew’s comment ” And it also raises the question of Alaskan independence — is it a good idea? ”
    ————-
    1) Having had the misfortune to be educated at Harvard, Matthew never learned to look at the Numbers.

    2) So let’s compare the RUSSIAN Stock Market Index with the S&P 500 during the Bush Administration:

    a) RTS Index has risen from 163 on Jan 15, 2001 to 1667 today!!! (In dollar terms)
    b) In the same period, S&P 500 has DECLINED from 1327 to 1283. (A significant LOSS when you add in inflation.

    3) Plus, if you are a US Citizen, you owe almost $10 Trillion on the Federal Debt, up almost $5 Trillion from when Bush entered office. And your Social Security/Medicare “Account” –that some of you have been paying into for decades? Nothing’s there. Bupkus. Republicans cleaned out the larder.

    4) Maybe Palin should build a Highway to the 48 states –so that the rest of us can defect to Russia with her.

    5) That’s the reason WHY McCain picked her, you know. First South Ossetia defected to Putin — closing the door to that Caspian Sea oil Candy Store. Then Alaska started getting wobbly — as Palin sweetly explained to McCain in her interview. After all, Alaska still HAS a National Guard — whereas the lower 48 has its army in Iraq and Afghanistan and maybe Georgia soon.

    6) That’s why the Republicans picked Palin. Sheer panic.

  12. Jeffrey Davis Says:

    “navel observatory”?

    Is she a Buddhist, too?

  13. Just Dropping By Says:

    Re: Saudi Arabia having a “very small population” — Saudi Arabia actually had a fairly small population until relatively recently. The population didn’t exceed the single digit millions until the 1980s, IIRC. A lot of the recent socio-political instability in the country has been attributed to the massive population boom which outstripped growth in oil revenues.

  14. nobi yuno Says:

    What would Karl Rove do with this information? The fact is, the GOP candidate for VP is a traitor who wants to literally tear apart the United States of America and complete the job (”peacefully” they say) that Robert E Lee started.

    Southern strategy, indeed.

  15. Craig Says:

    I just hope someone tells her to stop rocking her chair back and forth like that. It doesn’t do a lot to project that “experienced…tested…ready to lead” vibe that should be fairly radiating from her after her years of experience with the local PTA.

    Cohen calls her a “sitcom” pick in that column; the smartest thing he’s said in years.

  16. SGEW Says:

    All I have to say about the Alaska Independence Party fooferaw is:

    This is a very, very bad time to be involved with the American Institute of Physics (A.I.P.). Sigh.

  17. Don Williams Says:

    Re nobi yuno’s comment “The fact is, the GOP candidate for VP is a traitor who wants to literally tear apart the United States of America ”
    ————
    Think of it as “Change You Can Believe In”.

    Hey, the USA was strongly modeled on the Roman Republic. Look on the back of a fucking quarter for Christ’s sake –that emblem once marched at the head of Caesar’s Legions.

    So the Rich , having made a mint by shitting in their own nest, are packing up to flee to New Constantiople — and leaving the bankrupted rest of us to the Mexicans ..er Germanic invaders.

    Of COURSE the Empire is going to break up — if not now then after the avian flu pandemic weakens the civic bonds –just as the Asian plagues did to Rome starting around 165 AD.

    Only question is, when do we have the Year of the Four Emperors?

  18. berger Says:

    Wow … I’ve long ago given up trying to predict what will sway voters one way or another, but this seems like a big deal to me. She’s addressing a group of successionists! and now she’s running for veep…?

  19. berger Says:

    Whoops – make that “secessionists”

  20. Don Williams Says:

    Bush concedes that we’ve already given California back to the Mexicans.

    But, Hey, we still have 49 out of 50 states and that ain’t bad.

  21. Brittain33 Says:

    According to the latest Census figures, the population of Wasilla is actually larger than Saudi Arabia’s–and growing fast!

  22. wg Says:

    If this is an accurate predictor of her debating/communication skills… good lord. She makes Dubya look like Cicero. Her vibe is that of the unctuous middle-manager who’s taken a couple of training seminars and thinks she’s a management genius. The way she says “I know you agree with that” in that rushed, I’m-affirming-you, corporate-meeting-speak way, is just priceless. Think crazy rightwing Michael Scott/David Brent, or the idiot-boss from Office Space (”I’m gonna have to go ahead and ask you NOT to have that abortion, mkay?”).

    And round about the 40-second mark, what the hell does this sentence mean?

    We have a great promise to be a self-sufficient state, made up of the hardest-working, most grateful Americans, in our nation.

    Setting aside the inherent rhetorical contradictions (presumably she thinks she’s being clever, affirming secessionism and federalism simultaneously), it’s a marvel of gibberish. “Most grateful Americans”? Huh?

  23. Civil-Rights Lawyer Says:

    re Anomynous #5: The transformation of the party of Abraham Lincoln into the party of Jefferson Davis is now complete!

  24. Craig Says:

    But in order to keep Alaska part of the US it is necessary to have an American population there. If we had left it a territory and Russia may have been able to steal it away from us. After all we stole territory from Britain and Mexico by sending Americans into their territories. This is all speculation since Wikipedia isn’t being much help and I am too lazy to do real research.

  25. allbetsareoff Says:

    Proof positive that media/pundit types don’t know history: I’ve yet to hear the term “Seward’s folly” (William Seward being the secretary of state who engineered the purchase of Alaska from Russia for $7.2 million in 1867).

    Given that we’re unlikely to sell it back, and that there’s no constitutional provision I know of to revoke statehood once it’s granted, and that the Late Unpleasantness made secession a non-starter, what do about Alaska and its pigs-at-the-trough/bad-reality-TV politicians?

    Has anyone contemplated a RICO prosecution?

  26. mds Says:

    “Most grateful Americans”? Huh?

    Probably “Most grateful to Jesus of all Americans,” said with all the humility that Jesus himself demanded of his followers.

  27. Sam Says:

    Well, I’d just like to make a pitch for merging it with the rest of the frozen northern wastes we up here call “Canada”. Geographically sensible, we Albertans know all about running a petro-economy, and Canada even provides migrating moose for the Palins’ dining pleasure.

    In related news, moose stew is greasy as all hell. I’d steer clear. Caribou on the other hand, if you can track it down, is gorgeous. As is muskox. Simply season, quickly grill, and you’re away.

  28. Reality Man Says:

    I have to admit — while a president Palin may well wreck our economy, indulge in God-knows-what foreign adventures, and maybe even impose theocratic fascism upon us, I can say this much: I’ll at least go to my unmarked grave laughing.

    A revolution without laughing is a revolution not worth having.

    McCain picks a treasonous moron. More news at 11.

  29. Reality Man Says:

    Sarah Palin was for Alaska being American before she was against it before she was for it.

  30. Tom Hull Says:

    The knock on Alaska’s congressional representation shows a short memory. Sen. Ernest Gruening voted against the Gulf of Tonkin resolution. The only other senator to do so was Wayne Morse of Oregon. Sen. Mike Gravel read the Pentagon Papers into the Congressional Record. Of course, both were Democrats, and Alaska’s congressional delegation has been solid Republican for decades now.

    Gruening is long dead now, but Gravel ran for president this year. He was probably the most solidly antiwar candidate in the race, but didn’t get any respect. Funny thing is that Palin seems to be about as far off in the Republican fringe as Gravel is relative to the Democrats. Had she run for president she wouldn’t have fared any better. Yet here she is, a heartbeat and the small matter of an election away.

  31. An Outhouse Says:

    I always pictured Alaska as a giant welfare state where all the residents get refunds from the gov’t instead of paying taxes. Amazing how people who live off the largess of the state consider themselves radical libertaians (i.e. Barry Goldwater).

  32. Andrew Pulrang Says:

    Can anyone enlighten us on what membership in the Scottish National Party means in Scotland? Are members considered dangerous radicals? Or, is being a member more a way of showing one’s deep love of Scotland’s history and heritage? I got the impression from the way she talks about the party, that she views it more in an historical appreciation context, kind of like a group of re-enactors or history buffs. Of course, it’s entirely possible that what she thinks, but that it is, in fact, a bit, or a lot scarier.

  33. viagra Says:

    viagra
    If you have to do it, you might as well do it right

  34. viagra Says:

    I want to say – thank you for this!

  35. xanax Says:

    Excellent site. It was pleasant to me.
    xanax

  36. Irvine Paula Says:

    Found you on google, it was easy, great site

  37. tramadol Says:

    tramadol
    Great site. Good info

  38. brand viagra Says:

    Great site. Good info
    buy cheap viagra

  39. viagra brand Says:

    I want to say – thank you for this!
    cheap brand pfizer viagra


Jump to Top

About Wonk Room | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2008 Center for American Progress Action Fund
imageRegisterimageimageRSSimageimageimage image
image
Advertisement

Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
image 

Books By Matthew Yglesias
Book Cover

Heads in the Sand

Buy the book


imageTopic Cloud


Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report




Contact Matthew Yglesias
Use this form to contact blog author Matthew Yglesias.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll


imageAbout Matt YglesiasimageimageContact MeimageimageDonateimage