Matt Yglesias

Aug 11th, 2008 at 9:39 am

What Is Maximum Pressure?

Washington Times calls for the United States to exert “maximum pressure” on Russia in defense of Georgia. This means, what, exactly? Deploy troops? Threaten nuclear war? And then there’s Robert Kagan who, as you’ll recall, is considered the respectable neocon. Shockingly enough, he thinks the best way to understand this particular foreign policy crisis is through a Munich analogy!

The details of who did what to precipitate Russia’s war against Georgia are not very important. Do you recall the precise details of the Sudeten Crisis that led to Nazi Germany’s invasion of Czechoslovakia? Of course not, because that morally ambiguous dispute is rightly remembered as a minor part of a much bigger drama.

It seems to me that rather than specifically informing us of each and every time something happens in the world that reminds neocons of the Sudetenland crisis, maybe they should let us know on those rare occasions when a world event doesn’t spark a Munich analogy. That would be a dog bites man kind of story. Meanwhile, if we launch a war with Russia — which would seem to be the point of busting out the analogy — then how are we going to find the time to launch wars with Iran and China? And what about Syria?

UPDATE: And of course there’s Bill Kristol:

When the “civilized world” expostulated with Russia about Georgia in 1924, the Soviet regime was still weak. In Germany, Hitler was in jail. Only 16 years later, Britain stood virtually alone against a Nazi-Soviet axis. Is it not true today, as it was in the 1920s and ’30s, that delay and irresolution on the part of the democracies simply invite future threats and graver dangers?

Now of course Vladimir Putin really is a bad actor. And it should be said that as of today Russia seems to be going beyond anything that could be justified as a response to Georgia’s provocation in South Ossetia. But the habit that the Kristols of the world have of deploying this kind of rhetoric is infuriating. If Kristol really thinks we should go to war with Russia, he’s being crazy and irresponsible. If he doesn’t think that, then he has no business busting out these Munich analogies. Nowhere in his column does he propose a single concrete step with any meaningful chance of altering the situation — it’s all dedicated to mocking doves, but utterly lacking in viable alternatives.






116 Responses to “What Is Maximum Pressure?”

  1. Don Williams Says:

    IF Georgia falls to Russia, then Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan’s oil exports to the West are blocked. Hence , they have to throw in with Russia. And sell oil to Beijing, which will desperately need it in the coming decades.

    Wonder what the Turks are doing? I suspect the Russian Recon sats are taking a close look at certain airfields there and in Iraq.

  2. lowellfield Says:

    In fairness to Kagan, the Sudetenland analogy for South Ossetia kind of presents itself. Disputed affiliation with a sizeable population that has ethnic/national ties to the more powerful state…

    One could in theory (I didn’t read the whole Kagan link so I don’t know if he did) point out the similarity without necessarily arguing for a US war with Russia.

  3. right Says:

    Washington Times calls for the United States to exert “maximum pressure” on Russia in defense of Georgia. This means, what, exactly? Deploy troops? Threaten nuclear war?

    I don’t see how “maximum pressure” could mean anything other than nuking Moscow. What would exert more pressure than that?

  4. Bob Dise Says:

    And where, exactly, would we find the troops for this war?

    Oh yeah, deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    Do you suppose that the Russians realize that we’ve tied our own hands, and by doing so, given them the freedom of action to engage in this sort of adventure?

    Heckuva job, Georgie.

  5. right Says:

    Do you suppose that the Russians realize that we’ve tied our own hands, and by doing so, given them the freedom of action to engage in this sort of adventure?

    What, because if we had a few thousand troops free we’d go fight a land war with Russia?

    IF Georgia falls to Russia, then Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan’s oil exports to the West are blocked. Hence , they have to throw in with Russia. And sell oil to Beijing, which will desperately need it in the coming decades.

    Is there a reason oil couldn’t be piped across Armenia and Turkey rather than across Georgia?

  6. sven Says:

    Kagan has the right idea, let’s ignore all of the details of history.

    South Ossetia is the Sudetenland. Wait, maybe Georgia is Afghanistan. Georgia is the Union, South Ossetia is the Confederacy, Russia is Great Britain (if in the counter-factual they had invaded the Union from Canada), and the United States is Russia (passively supporting but doing nothing).

    Damn, I keep forgetting which details I shouldn’t worry about and which details are lessons humanity should never be allowed to forget.

    I know, South Ossetia is Brittany during the Hundred Years War.

  7. An Outhouse Says:

    Remember, this is NOT just like Kosovo leaving Yugoslavia. South Ossetia must remain part of Georgia because …

    The analogy to Nazis is wrong. Instead its just like Stalin’s attack on Finland!

  8. politicalfootball Says:

    If anyone is wondering why Yglesias switched his web site’s affiliation, I think I have the answer after reading his first entries here: Thinkprogress appears to have been willing to spring for a copy editor!

  9. Don Williams Says:

    The news reports that Russia has bombed close to Chevron’s Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline (the one that carries Caspian Oil to Turkey’s southwestern port ) are hilarious.

    By the strangest coincidence, that huge pipeline was shut down on August 6 by sabotage –an explosion in Turkey — and is expected to be out of commission for 5 weeks.

    I wonder if Putin dabbles in the futures market?

  10. attaturk Says:

    The most appropriate analogy to Russia/Georgia is found in the United States own history.

    How many tears are spilled now over America’s illegal war with Mexico over Texas?

    http://rising-hegemon.blogspot.com/2008/08/our-hands-are-clean.html

  11. Don Williams Says:

    Re right’s question “Is there a reason oil couldn’t be piped across Armenia and Turkey rather than across Georgia?”
    ———-
    Because if it is pumped across Turkey, the Armenians would blow up the pipeline in their territory just to fuck the Turks. And if it was piped across Armenia, the Turks would blow up the pipeline in their territory just to fuck the Armenians.

  12. gregor Says:

    The endearing spelling mistakes may be gone, but the look of the site is much less appealing. Who chose these fonts? Give me the Times.

  13. RLH Says:

    I am really anxious for Obama to find the zone between McCain’s belligerence and Bush’s impotence.

  14. Audie Says:

    Too bad for the Georgians their leader apparently thought Putin was as impressed by Bush’s posturing as he was.

    I’m sure Kagan believes this would never have happened if we had invaded Iran. But if he and anyone else thinks we ought to go to war with Russia, they ought to consider that invading Russia in the Fall tends to end badly. It’s not a lot of fun being stuck in Moscow and Petersburg when the snow starts.

    The damage done by the Bush administration’s Mayberry Machiavellis was bad, but not nearly as disastrous as the damage done by their Mayberry Bismarks.

  15. Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle Says:

    Is Kristol anything more than a one trick pony? His answer to everything is to bomb the shit(Can I say that here?) out of it. Talk about dumbing down the discourse. Then again, I am kinda curious what Fred Hiatt has to say about this. I wonder if Freddie was impressed by the stern lecture George gave to Putin over the weekend.

  16. ctrenta Says:

    Welcome back Matt!

    Great to see you blogging again.

  17. Don Williams Says:

    Ah, you guys still don’t get it. The Neocons are going apeshit because the Caspian Sea oil wasn’t supposed to STOP at Turkey’s Ceyhan port.

    It is supposed to be transhipped –via ISRAEL’s Ashkelon-Eliat pipeline — to the Red Sea for tanker shipment to USA and China. Avoid that nasty Iranian “Persian Gulf”.

    Can you imagine the potential profits –and leverage — from having your hand around that carotid artery as Peak Oil hits?

  18. crack Says:

    If anyone is wondering why Yglesias switched his web site’s affiliation, I think I have the answer after

    politicalfootball’s first entry here. A failed attempt to avoid the grammar/spelling trolls.

  19. politicalfootball Says:

    I dunno, gregor, I like this site. The html buttons are convenient, and after posting my first comment, I’m impressed by the response time.

    As for Kagan, I thought he almost managed to make it through a whole column without saying something howlingly stupid. Take this:

    Diplomats in Europe and Washington believe Saakashvili made a mistake by sending troops to South Ossetia last week. Perhaps. But his truly monumental mistake was to be president of a small, mostly democratic and adamantly pro-Western nation on the border of Putin’s Russia.

    Now that’s oversimplified (Saakashvili’s closeness with the West was the result of his hostility to Russia as much as it was the cause), but this is pretty close to Yglesias’ own formulation on the topic - far from God and close to Russia.

    Like I said, Kagan almost made it through a whole column without saying something silly, but then he unloaded this one:

    Russia’s attack on sovereign Georgian territory marked the official return of history, indeed to an almost 19th-century style of great-power competition … even — though it shocks our 21st-century sensibilities — the use of military power to obtain geopolitical objectives.

    Now that’s almost Krauthammerian in its lack of self-awareness.

  20. gratefulcub Says:

    Of course Russia’s response is “going beyond anything that could be justified as a response to Georgia’s provocation in South Ossetia.”

    Their response is always over the top. Georgia seems to have intentionally provoked Russia. As a warning to anyone else that might feel like poking the bear in the ribs, they will destroy large swaths of Georgia, just as they did Chechenya. They are the original Shock and Awe’ers. This method is so effective, that I am truly shocked Georgia miscalculated this situation to this degree.

  21. gratefulcub Says:

    Irony to end Irony would be the US avoiding all out war with a very dangerous, paranoid, and militaristic Soviet Union, only to have Bush and his crew go to war with Russia.

  22. Peter Principle Says:

    Kagan: “The details of who did what to precipitate Russia’s war against Georgia are not very important.”

    Whereas the details of who did what to precipate Israel’s 2006 war against Lebanon were part of a carefully orchestrated plot by the slavering Iranian Islamofascist hordes to take over the world!

    Mr. Pot, meet Mr. Kettle.

  23. Jeff Fecke Says:

    It seems to me that rather than specifically informing us of each and every time something happens in the world that reminds neocons of the Sudetenland crisis, maybe they should let us know on those rare occasions when a world event doesn’t spark a Munich analogy.

    Perfect! Because they’d never say anything again…

  24. Marshall Says:

    Why is Vladimir Putin such a bad actor? It seems to me he’s a prudent but ambitious world leader taking advantage of full coffers, a unified state apparatus, and the weakness of any power that might have offered opposition. What exactly do you have to do to be a bad actor rather than just “exactly what American policy makers should expect under the circumstances?”

  25. JohnH Says:

    The details of who did what to precipitate Russia’s war against Georgia are not very important.” An analogy there might be that it doesn’t matter whether, say, Hitler invaded the Sudetenland or vice versa. This kind of rhetoric is painfully silly and would be hard to fathom if it didn’t have so consistent a neocon history. Remember, say, that it didn’t really matter if Iraq had WMD or ties to Al Qaeda. What mattered is that we had to invade Iraq.

  26. Whispers Says:

    I think a reasonable rhetorical response to the Washington Times is to excoriate them for encouraging nuclear war. They have, after all, used the phrase “maximum pressure”. Rather than bother to try to discern what this foggy phrase means, I think it’s reasonable to take the simplest explanation - they mean that the US should threaten Moscow with a nuclear strike.

    That is, after all, what “maximum pressure” actually means. And if they Times were to say that is not what they mean, then they have to explain what they really do mean.

  27. JT Says:

    Kristol has an interesting idea.

    Wouldn’t the easiest thing be just to keep the next Hitler in jail instead of letting him out?

  28. tom Says:

    Translation of Maximum Pressure:
    Pressure that (theoretically) falls short of war, but far exceeds the pressure exerted by the various wussies in the State Department (realist wussies), Democratic Party (appeasing wussies), and the Obama Campaign (posing maximum pressure but really appeasing wussies). In other words maximum pressure is that special, magic kind of pressure that will show Putin that WE MEAN BUSINESS! And thus he’ll instantly back down and behave just like we want. This is because history closely examined always proves that acting tougher, rather than pissing off someone with a large powerful military, will always force cowardly totalitarians to back down. Therefore our NATO overtures were less than maximum pressure because they didn’t work. Russia didn’t back down We should have spent these past few years exerting MAXIMUM PRESSURE on the Russians! Which, by definition, always works. People who are serious about foreign policy understand this concept. If you think MAXIMUM PRESSURE needs more explanation, it only proves that you are naive.

  29. Don Williams Says:

    Here’s Haaretz’s story on how the Caspian Sea oil pipeline may go through Georgia but will hopefully END at Israel’s Red Sea port of Eliat — where USA and Chinese tankers will have to pull in and say “fill her up”.

    See http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/945484.html

    Any wonder why William Kristol and the other sock puppets for the Israel Lobby are going apeshit? There’s real money involved here. And a way to ensure perpetual US protection for Israel via oil dependency.

  30. Edward, the mad shirt grinder Says:

    tom wins the thread, IMHO.

    I think we should we make up a set of pressure gauges with the words MAXIMUM PRESSURE to hand out to neocon editorialists at every opportunity.

  31. Marshall Says:

    We should have spent these past few years exerting MAXIMUM PRESSURE on the Russians! Which, by definition, always works

    To those of you who understand maximum pressure as nuke Moscow: this hits much closer to the mark. Maximum pressure is that set of actions which 1. brings about exactly the reactions on the part of its object that benefits the United States 2. is costless and 3. is never put into practice, thus remaining available to Op/Ed critics.

  32. Don Williams Says:

    Hmmmm. I wonder why Chevron didn’t name the pipeline the Baku-Tbilisi-Israel Pipeline?

    By the way, anyone heard from Bin Ladin lately? And what does Saudi Arabia think about this competitor?

    Of course, IRAN argues that part of the Caspian Sea oil belongs to her. Russia makes the same argument.

  33. Don Williams Says:

    Damm. I seem to have mislaid my SLC dog whistle.

  34. Don Williams Says:

    It should be mentioned that British Petroleum aka BP owns a share of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline.

    In the good old days, BP was known as the Anglo-Iranian Oil company. It protected it’s oil concessions by conning the CIA into overthrowing the legally elected government of IRan and installing the oil dictator Shah Pahlavi. See CIA Officer Kermit Roosevelt’s First edition of “Countercoup” (pulled from US bookshelves ) or here:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Petroleum#Activity_in_1909_-_1979

    But just remember George W’s point: They hate us for our FREEDOM.

  35. vanya Says:

    Of course the really stupid thing about the Sudetenland analogy is that it is Hitler’s methods - the anti-semitism and reliance on state terror - that were the issue, not the goal of annexation. Most of the population of the Sudetenland DID want to be part of Germany and not part of Czechoslovakia, which, remember, in 1938 was still an artificial country cobbled together out of the ruins of the Austro-Hungarian empire, that had existed for all of 20 years as a nation state. The West likes to draw arbitrary lines in the sand and say “stop here.” So it’s fine for Georgia to leave the USSR, not fine for Ossetians to leave Georgia, fine for Ukrainians to leave Russia, not fine for Crimea to leave Ukraine, fine for Kosovar Albanians to secede from Serbia, not fine for Kosovar Serbs to secede from Kosovo, etc.

  36. mike Says:

    Didn’t Goerge Bush look Putin in the eye and know he could do business with him? Or did he look in his heart? or was it his soul?

    I also find it interesting that the details for why the Russia-Georgia problem started are considered not important.

    Ever wonder what the German equivalent of the necons were saying to Hitler in 1937? — we’re morally superior; we have the right to go into this country to defend our interests; it’s for the better; the world will understand in the long run.

  37. DrBB Says:

    Now of course Vladimir Putin really is a bad actor.

    Well I dunno. I thought he and W looked kind cute together shaking hands and making googoo eyes across the seats during the Olympics opening ceremonies the other night. Wasn’t that while the invasion was just getting underway? Hard to imagine Dear Leader being sucker punched like that by such a warm, personal friend whose eyes he had looked into and seen his soul etc. So there must be some other explanation than “Our president is an idiot.” Plus he couldn’t have spent all that time cuddling around with the beach volley ball chicks and all those other cute athletes over the last few days if there was really anything serious going on like Russia invading a former SSR neighbor. I mean, that would take a really feckless dimwitted presidink to do something like that and the press would be merciless you’d think. So it must not be a serious situation or anything.

  38. llyonnoc Says:

    Interesting comments but no answers. Much criticism but no suggestions. Oh, there was one, the person was it who said in the mid-1800s we wrongfully went to war with Mexico therefore we should be disabled from doing anything thereon.

    This is serious situation because if Russian can gobble up Georgia, then Ukraine will be next. Already the Russian Foreign Minister said that Ukraine was behind Georgia’s forays into Ossetia. So it does seem to me that some type of action must be taken.

    Matt criticises the idea of ‘maximum pressure’ but has no suggestion himself. Is it the province of the left to criticize but not offer solutions? Sometimes I think that is the case with these wisenhowers.

    I suggest we do our best to avoid a military conflict with Russia. We can start putting pressure on it by looking at its financial and prestige interests and threaten them. Kick it out of the G-8 and things like that. Of course we will need Europe’s help, but it, like many of the commentators here, will be good with criticism but deficient in taking effective steps.

  39. CJColucci Says:

    The Washington Times and William Irvingson Kristol have a problem. This isn’t happening on the watch of the Bill Clinton or Barack Obama administrations; it’s happening with their guys in charge. Their guys don’t know what to do about this. Neither do the Washington Times or Kristol. Frankly, I don’t either, but they’re the ones who are screaming, not me.

  40. Ed Marshall Says:

    Kick it out of the G-8 and things like that.

    You can’t. You could withdraw from the G-8 and make something else but once again it’s not going to happen!

  41. Roycommi Says:

    i sometimes wonder why it seems those of us on the left seem so anathema to the mere threat of force upon other nations. Georgia is a western style democracy that has had an internal insurrection fueled as a direct result of Russian money and direct actions on the part or Russia (Russia being an authoritarian regime i might add). Why in gods name wouldn’t we leap to support Georgia? We can do an awful lot short of sending in troops. As long as Russia KNOWS nothing is stopping them, then why wouldn’t they continue to expand?

  42. SLC Says:

    Re Don Williams

    It’s certainly good to have the blogs favorite paranoid back and in good fetter. We really missed him during June and July. Actually, Mr. Williams can make a decent case blaming Israel, if not Hiam Saban personally, for the current Russian invasion of Georgia as Israel has been selling arms to Georgia. In fact, a deal announced just last week was put on hold because of the current situation.

    Relative to the proposed oil pipeline from Turkey to Israel, that may explain the current Turkish effort at being the intermediary between Syria and Israel. My hypothesis is that the Turks have concluded that a settlement on that front would allow the pipeline to go through Syria on its way to Haifa instead of under the sea from a Turkish port.

  43. wwew Says:

    russia is just doing what the neocons say the US should do when we get poked in the ribs. you know bomb the isht out of everything, dont hold anything back, show everyone whos boss, pick up some small crappy little country and throw it against the wall, just to show the world we mean business.

    i have no idea why they would be complaining right now.

  44. Reality Man Says:

    I suggest we do our best to avoid a military conflict with Russia. We can start putting pressure on it by looking at its financial and prestige interests and threaten them. Kick it out of the G-8 and things like that. Of course we will need Europe’s help, but it, like many of the commentators here, will be good with criticism but deficient in taking effective steps.

    Europe won’t be on board because they are too dependent on Russian energy supplies. Kicking them out of G-8 is stupid because we need their help on things like loose nukes and the Iranian nuclear program, which is more important to our national security than who controls South Ossetia. Considering how G-8 is supposed to be about the major economic powers managing the global economy and how Russia is a major economy, kicking Russia out of G-8 does more to hurt G-8 than Russia by making it unable to do anything useful without all of the actual major economies on board. As is, G-8 needs to have China and India on board as well, as well as Brazil sometime in the near future, to be truly effective.

    i sometimes wonder why it seems those of us on the left seem so anathema to the mere threat of force upon other nations. Georgia is a western style democracy that has had an internal insurrection fueled as a direct result of Russian money and direct actions on the part or Russia (Russia being an authoritarian regime i might add). Why in gods name wouldn’t we leap to support Georgia? We can do an awful lot short of sending in troops. As long as Russia KNOWS nothing is stopping them, then why wouldn’t they continue to expand?

    A threat of force has to be credible to work. We don’t have the troops to send and we are not going to start bombing Russia with air strikes due to the danger of retaliation. As such, threatening Russia over this would be like threatening a bear stealing your honey with a BB gun while fighting off two more bears behind you. Russia cares about Georgia a lot more than we care about Georgia and they know it.

    There are no real good guys in this conflict. Of course Putin isn’t. However, the Georgian president invaded South Ossetia, a de facto independent region for over a decade that doesn’t seem to want to be part of Georgia, and thus provoked the Russian response. Trying to put this in clear, WWII-style terms just shows the hobgoblins of little minds at work.

  45. Nat Says:

    I think maximum pressure amounts to dropping our surplus copies of ‘Red Dawn’ on Georgia. This question remains: VHS or DVD?

  46. pseudonymous in nc Says:

    I incline to the wisdom of Gary Brecher on these matters. Or Mark Ames.

    And CJColucci’s right: the US and Europe have set fairly arbitrary distinctions on who gets to be an oppressed minority and who gets to be a bunch of whiny separatists. And now they’re a bit fucked.

  47. tom Says:

    Better yet, we could let Charlie Sheen and Patrick Swayze set up their own Wolverine! covert op school up in the Caucuses.

    (PS: I’m ashamed that I know that much about that movie. I blame it on growing up in the Reagan era. Peter Scoblic could have had another chapter in US vs Them about bad 80s cold war movies inspired by the conservative movement.)

  48. Northern Observer Says:

    The elephant in the room is the one Kristol et all can never admit to; that certains parts of the globe, Caucauses, Ukraine, Central Asia, are part of Russia’s traditional sphere of influence, and doing anything within them without Moscow’s tacit approval was a basic strategic blunder. And that extending even the hint of NATO protection to these areas was a receipe for stark humuliation or Global War because it creates a big temptation on the part of the Moscow-resisting regime to punch way above its weight cause big daddy gonna cover our ass. There must be significant covert American involvement in Georgia for their frontline troops to honestly be muttering “where are the Americans”? There was an expectation of protection that is dangerous. It’s like Serbia in 1914 acting all brash and bold because Russia would cover its ass. In a way we are very very lucky that the US is overcommitted in Iraq and Afghanistan, that the current President has zero credibililty, and that Americas fianances are crap, because if all three of these conditions were not in place, you would have a US that for prestige reasons would at least consider military intervention. Thank God that won’t happen.

  49. Trevor Says:

    “Now of course Vladimir Putin really is a bad actor.” (MY)

    To Joe Lieberman & Co. he is. Because he’s no fan of Apartheid Israel. Because he stands in opposition to the neocons agenda of Greed and Domination. And, because he had the nerve to throw the Jewish billionaires who were raping Russia blind in jail or force them into exile. The civilized world has a lot more faith and regard for Putin than they do for any Western leader. He doesn’t have to be “good for the Jews” and bad for everyone else to earn their trust and gain their respect.

  50. Tony J Says:

    Kagan: “The details of who did what to precipitate Russia’s war against Georgia are not very important.”

    Translation - “The details of who did what to precipitate Russia’s war against Georgia are, obviously, very important in talking about what’s going on in the region, but since those details contradict the line of crap I’m about to spin, I’m going to ignore them.”

    Funny funny stuff.

  51. Tony J Says:

    Hey, Trevor. Just go and fuck yourself, okay? Thanks.

  52. opus 131 Says:

    Gee, maybe if we weren’t so utterly dependent on oil imports, Putin wouldn’t have us quite so over a barrel. That silly Jimmy Carter in his cardigan, urging conservation and forcing higher CAFE standards…whatever happened to those initiatives? Oh, yeah–Ronald Reagan happened. Then a couple of oil men named Bush. The guy in between, Clinton, made a few half hearted stabs at a rational energy policy, but of course ExxonMobil’s whores in Congress took care of that But don’t worry. Offshore and ANWAR drilling should take care of everything.

  53. DrBB Says:

    Why in gods name wouldn’t we leap to support Georgia?

    That would be all those 50-megaton nukes they’ve got, plus the ones we’ve got==Le Grand Kaboom. Next question?

  54. James Canning Says:

    I agree that invoking Czechoslovakia 1938 into the debate tends to mislead more than to illuminate. The South Ossetians were disaffected, but trading and intermarriage with their Georgian compatriots was proceeding along and there was no need to “resolve” the disagreeable situation by military means. Did John McCain’s national security adviser encourage rash moves by the Georgian president? His lobby shop was paid $900,000 in recent years, by Georgia.

  55. SFAW Says:

    Something’s been tickling the back of my mind for awhile, maybe someone can help me with it …

    The Georgia/Russia conflict seems to have been building for awhile. Russia sticking its thumb in Georgia’s eye in a non-violent-but-highly-provocative-way, Georgia finally attempting to exert its manhood, but whoops! Russia wanted that to happen and so was massing troops on the border. But what’s a little puzzling is that no one in the Administration - say, someone thought of by Bush/Cheney as an expert regarding Russian/Soviet affairs and their whole world outlook, etc. - raised a red flag awhile ago. Something like “This conflict is going to happen in the next 3-6 months; here’s what we should do to prevent Russia from annexing the Sudetenland (so to speak)” and so forth.

    It reminds me, somehow, of that time in 2001 (pre-9/11) when the various agencies (FBI, CIA, NSA?, etc.) each had pieces of the puzzle relative to what became 9/11, but there seemed to be no one tying it all together. (In the sense of getting the different agencies to share info, that is.) If there had been someone whose job responsibilities included overseeing issues relating to national security, and coordinating an integrated effort, that person might have had enough foresight and skill to prevent or at least minimize the damage done by al Qaeda. But I guess when Clinton dismantled the entire national security structure, he made it impossible for Bush to rebuild it in time.

    Is there a common thread? It hardly seems likely that incompetence on that scale could happen twice. Any thoughts? Bueller?

    Regarding “maximum pressure”: it’s obvious that we need to try to adhere to the Tufnel Doctrine. It stops short of nukes, but it would certainly amp up the pressure on Russia significantly.

  56. SFAW Says:

    Trevor -
    You forgot to say “Juden raus!

  57. Robert Says:

    Matt, if you read your comments, you’ll know I’m nothing of a neocon. But I too was thinking of Nazis in response to this kerfuffle, and the parallels–while not obviously instructive in the present case–seem clear enough not to be dismissed as the shadows neocons would find even at high noon. In both instances, a regime we don’t like (and with good reason, although in the case of Nazi Germany this dislike is unfortunately retrospective) is thwarting another country’s claims to legal sovereignty on the basis of ethnic similarities between the annexing country and the disputed land. That is why my thoughts turned to the Anschluss and the Sudetenland.

    This, however, seems a case in which Nazi parallels are bound to corrupt thought. The Anschluss only seems unambiguously bad because we know the nature of Nazism and what was to follow. Putin, for all his faults, is not another Hitler, and today we don’t know the future like a historian knows the future when considering 1938. Liberals, I suppose, generally support the problematic concept a self-determination. I know I do. But I do so with an anti-imperialist framework and a historical knowledge that, since the French Revolution, nationalist movements and democracy promotion often go hand-in-hand. That isn’t the case now, and certainly wasn’t the case in 1938. Southern Ossetians will not be “freed” by Russian involvement, that much is clear. But Russia is not rearming at an astounding rate in violation to a major treaty that ended the largest conflict in history, at least the largest since the Napoleonic Wars at any rate, which is what Germany was doing under Hitler. Nor does Putin seem wedded to a religiously (and religiously violent) nationalism, as Hitler was. It is here that the historical analogy falls apart. With Kagan et al. seemingly eager for renewed tension between major powers, we’d be wise to remember Arthur Schlesinger’s words: “Santayana’s aphorism must be reversed: too often it is those who can remember the past who are condemned to repeat it.”

  58. Tim Says:

    I was just noting to a friend how Russia seems about to perfectly execute the war that Israel tried and failed to prosecute against Hizbollah back in 2006. I wonder if Putin read the Knesset report on what went wrong.

  59. Peter K. Says:

    I was just noting to a friend how Russia seems about to perfectly execute the war that Israel tried and failed to prosecute against Hizbollah back in 2006. I wonder if Putin read the Knesset report on what went wrong.

    Did the Georgians really fight back via the guerrilla style à la Hezbollah? I thought they just fought them head-on then withdrew.

    If the Georgians do fight a guerrilla war, Russia will just pursue a scorched earth policy å la Chechnya and the Georgians know that.

    I wonder if Iraq would have gone better if another dictator was installed and a scorched earth policy followed. Of course even if had, anti-war people would cry about the tactics.

    Granted I think the Georgian leader was stupid for provoking Russia. We should just increase aid to Ukraine and the other democracies nearby.

    Will Georgia become another Belarus? I hope not, but not much we can do.

  60. SLC Says:

    The Ruskies are just sowing how the application of Hama Rles works. Seems to be pretty effective.

  61. kert Says:

    Im not here to to justify any war, its obvious that nobody can really intervene here, not US, not NATO and UN is useless.

    However, Georgia DID NOT start this. Follow the news leading up to the events ( writeen both in cyrillic and latin ), russians were messing around for several months around the border and already amassing forces. Border violations, shooting down drones and arming the separatists.

    Russian propaganda campaign started on 3th, separatists in Ossetia got very active after that. Georgia tried ceasefire with separatists on 7th, which was ignored by them.

    Where georgians made a mistake, is give in to provocations and roll in larger armed forces, which miraculuously, just hours later ( or sooner, tough to tell by now ) resulted in hundreds of russian tanks rolling across the border. Where did they come from all of a sudden, Novosibirsk ?

    I would really like to hear an intelligence report on the events of 7-8th by a western agency that actually has some clue. Unfortunately it wont be forthcoming until its too late.

  62. Trevor Says:

    “Hey, Trevor. Just go and fuck yourself, okay? Thanks.” (Tony J) “Trevor -You forgot to say “Juden raus!“” (SFW)

    Yeah, the truth hurts. Putin IS held in higher esteem across the globe than Bush, Sarkozy, Merkel, Brown, or anyone else because he’s not encouraging or ennabling Apartheid Israel, because he (unlike Obama) isn’t afraid of the Zionist elite, because he doesn’t think you get a pass to shoot Palestinian children in the back for “sport”, or impoverish an entire country because you’re Jewish. Is he an angel? No. compared to the wicked and odious scrofula that Tony. J., SFW, and all the other asthmatic neocon toadies cheer on - he’s Christ Almighty.

  63. SFAW Says:

    Trevor -
    Your doctor called. He said you shouldn’t be going off your meds without his approval, and he’d like you to call him right away.

  64. Nathan Says:

    “This method is so effective, that I am truly shocked Georgia miscalculated this situation to this degree.”

    Because they’re either incompetent or baited/duped suckers. I vote option two.

    Secret talks between Georgia and Russia immediately prior to the hostilities probably resulted in tacit approval or at least a seemingly clear signal that the Russians wouldn’t intervene. After the duped Georgians engaged, the Russians had their opportunity and invaded.

    Similarly, CBS News ran its Bush National Guard docs by the White House prior to dissemination, and received no comment, indicating to the folks at CBS that the docs were genuine. Upon dissemination, the WH cronies pounced.

  65. thepoliticalcat Says:

    Saakashvili is an American-educated power-hungry fool who has lost a lot of support and credibility since the “Rose Revolution.” He thought he could draw the US into a war that would keep him in power. He badly misjudged the Russian response. He’s been playing footsie with Emperor Jor Jee for years now about American military bases in his nation. And now Cheney is calling for more war and more blood. Is anyone still listening to that fuckhead?

    American “advisors” have been in Georgia since 2002, and there is reason to believe that they cooperated with the Israelis to attack the people of South Ossetia, who want no part of Saakashvili or the Georgian state.

  66. Jimbo Says:

    ” And it should be said that as of today Russia seems to be going beyond anything that could be justified as a response to Georgia’s provocation in South Ossetia.”

    I keep seeing variations on this theme in the blogs.

    As of this morning, the Georgians were still shelling Tskhinvali.

    Instead of going for an encirclement of Tskhinvali and a seizure of the Roki Tunnel, which is the logical strategy if you want to keep South Ossetia and the Ossetians in Georgia, the Georgians went for massive collateral damage and ethnic cleansing, leving the Roki Tunnel open and an avenue to drive the South Ossetians out of South Ossetia.

    Last Friday, the Russian proposal for a ceasefire to the UN Security Council was shot down by Britian and the US on Georgia,s behalf, because it required that both sides renounce the use of arms in solving the dispute.

    When the Bear got involved, the Georgians alternated between declaring victory, claiming they were withdrawing from South Ossetia and declaring a ceasfire, while Georgian troops were still in South Ossetia and still shelling and rocketing Tskhinvali and other South Ossetian towns.

    There are still Georgian Forces fighting in South Ossetia as of today, although it appears that Russian Forces will have pushed them out and completed mopping up operations by Wednesday.

    The Georgians histronically claimed that the Russians were attacking Gori, and Faux, CNN, ABC, AP et al, all confirmed this, but the reality, according to the only western media with actual reporters in Gori, (The Times and reuters) is that the Georgians abandoned the city in a panic to mere rumours of Russians,

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article4509692.ece

    BTW, the Grad Rockets, Helecopter Gunships, SU-25 Attack bombers and 155mm artillary shells that have been indiscriminately pounding Tskhinvali for 5 days now cae from Gori and positions around Gori.

    IMHO, the Russians will have “gone beyond justified” when they turn Tbilisi into nother Grodny. So far, the Russians have been very restrained in their response, a restraint that we have never seen the US manage. Georgian TV is still on the air, phone lines, water systems, cell phones, Georgian Radio are all, still on the air.

    This ain’t no Sock and Awe, unless your shock comes from seeing the Russian Army wage war surgically and your awe is based in how restrained the Russian response has been.

    Exile on Line has a couple of very good posts on not only the War so Far, but the propaganda campaign that Georgia has engaged in.

    http://exiledonline.com/

  67. Richard Steven Hack Says:

    People who think Russia started this are off track. Georgia has been building up troops to attack Ossetia for some time now, apparently. All the while Saakashvilli, the “democratic” President, has been arresting his opposition party leaders and beating protesters in the streets.

    As Justin Raimondo says, Saakashvilli is George Bush times 10:

    The Real Aggressor
    http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=13285

    Money Quotes:

    The anti-Russian bias of the Western media is really something to behold: “Russia Invades Georgia,” “Russia Attacks Georgia,” and variations thereof have been some of the choice headlines reporting events in the Caucasus, but the reality is not only quite different, but the exact opposite. Sometimes this comes out in the third or fourth paragraph of the reportage, in which it is admitted that the Georgians tried to “retake” the “breakaway province” of South Ossetia. The Georgian bombing campaign and the civilian casualties – if they are mentioned at all – are downplayed and presented as subject to dispute.

    The Georgians have been openly engaging in a military buildup since last year, and President Mikhail Saakashvili and his party have been proclaiming from the rooftops their aim of re-conquering South Ossetia (and rebellious Abkhazia, while they’re at it). Avid readers of Antiwar.com saw this coming. In a column entitled “Wars to Watch Out For,” I wrote:

    “As President Mikheil Saakashvili deflowers his own revolution and shuts down the opposition media, he could well try to divert attention away from his political problems by ginning up a fresh conflict with the breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, both of which are protected by Russian troops and regional militias.”

    That’s what Western reporters aren’t telling their readers: the South Ossetians (and the Abkhazians) have had de facto independence since 1991, when they rose up against their “democratic” central government, which had banned regional parties from participating in elections. They beat back the Georgian army, which, nonetheless, inflicted a lot of casualties and damage. A low-level war has been in progress ever since, with Saakashvili and his ultra-nationalist party using the rebels as a foil to divert attention from their repressive domestic policies and Georgia’s sad status as an economic basket case. As I wrote way back at the beginning of this year:

    “Saakashvili, the great ‘democrat,’ is busy charging anyone who opposes him with being a pawn of the Russians (and therefore guilty of treason), but the West is calling on him to restore civil liberties – and, in an apparent effort to propitiate his Western benefactors, he has lifted some restrictions and called new elections. Widespread and growing opposition to his strong-arm tactics, even among many of his former supporters, spells political trouble for Saakashvili and his corrupt cohorts, however – and an appeal to Georgian ultra-nationalism (which was always the real ideological motivation of the Rose Revolutionaries) would bolster him in the polls and provide a much-needed distraction, at least from the ruling party’s point of view.”

    What’s particularly disgusting is the spectacle of the fraudulent Saakashvili’s smug mug all over Western television – the BBC and Bloomberg, for starters – invoking his great love of “democracy” and “freedom” and calling on the U.S. to intervene in the name of supposedly shared “values.” What drivel! Up until very recently, Saakashvili has been busy rounding up his political opponents and charging them with espionage, as his police beat demonstrators in the streets. When this happened, even our somnolent media sat up and took notice, but they seem to have forgotten.

    In any case, it wasn’t too hard to have seen this coming a mile away, or to predict the American government’s response. As I wrote in “Wars To Watch Out For”:

    “In the event of an outbreak of hostilities, expect the U.S. to do what they have done for the duration of Georgia’s political crisis: proffer unconditional support to Saakashvili. With Russia aiding and giving political and diplomatic support to the Abkhazians and the Ossetians, and the Americans letting loose a flood of military aid to Tbilisi, this could be the first theater of actual conflict in the new cold war.”

    Which is precisely what has occurred. The United States is denouncing the Russians as aggressors in the UN Security Council and accusing the Kremlin of engaging in a policy of “regime change,” in Ambassador Khalilzad’s phrase. The Russian response: “regime change” is “an American invention,” but, hey, in Saakashvili’s case, it might not be such a bad idea.

    In short: if you love GWB, you’ll love President Saakashvili. Therefore it’s no surprise John McCain is portraying the Georgians as the good guys and demanding that Russian troops leave “sovereign Georgian territory” without preconditions or delay. After all, when your chief foreign policy adviser has up until very recently been a paid shill for the Georgian government, what else could we expect? As I’ve pointed out on a few occasions in this space, Mad John has been spoiling for a fight with the Russians – in the Caucasus and elsewhere – for years, going so far as to travel to Georgia to proclaim his sympathy for Saakashvili’s cause.

    What’s really interesting, however, is how Barack Obama has taken up this same cause, albeit with less vehemence than the GOP nominee. As Politico.com reported:

    “When violence broke out in the Caucasus on Friday morning, John McCain quickly issued a statement that was far more strident toward the Russians than that of President Bush, Barack Obama, and much of the West. But, as Russian warplanes pounded Georgian targets far beyond South Ossetia this weekend, Bush, Obama, and others have moved closer to McCain’s initial position.”

    This nonsense about Georgia’s alleged “sovereignty” rides roughshod over the reality of the Ossetians’ apparent determination to free themselves from Saakashvili’s grip, and it’s the buzzword that identifies a shill for the Georgians.

    “I condemn Russia’s aggressive actions,” said Obama, “and reiterate my call for an immediate cease-fire.” This cease-fire business is meant to feed directly into the Georgians’ contention that they have offered to stop the conflict, even as they continue military operations in South Ossetia, which have already cost the lives of over a thousand of that country’s inhabitants.

    That didn’t stop the McCainiacs from attacking Obama as a tool of the Kremlin. Sunday the news talk shows were abuzz with rumors of Democratic discontent over Obama’s seeming inability to hit back at McCain’s viciously negative campaign, yet it’s much worse than that – it’s not an unwillingness, but an inherent inability to do so. I hate to cite Andrew Sullivan favorably, but he was one of the first to note the convergence of the Obama camp and the McCain campaign on such central issues as Iran, and the process continues with this confluence of opinion on the Russian question. While the Obama people have dutifully pointed out that Randy Scheunemann, McCain’s foreign policy guru, earned hundreds of thousands of dollars for his public relations firm as a paid lobbyist for the Georgians, their own candidate’s position on the matter differs little from McCain’s, except, as the New York Times notes, in terms of “style.”

    I’ve written at length about the economic and political interests that stand to profit from a war in the Caucasus, and I won’t repeat myself here except to note that the timing of this – with attacking Iran on the War Party’s agenda – should alert us to the importance of what is happening. Russia has not only been opposed to Iran’s victimization at the hands of the West, but Putin and his successor have taken up Tehran’s cause, selling arms and technology to the Iranians and running diplomatic interference on their behalf. This is Washington’s counterattack by proxy.

    Please don’t tell me Saakashvili just woke up one day and decided to attack Ossetia, and that the Americans weren’t notified well in advance. Georgia depends on U.S. military and economic aid, and Saakashvili is a savvy operator: he is pulling a Lebanon, having learned from the Israeli example, and the Bush administration is more than glad to oblige him. Georgian tanks would never have rolled into South Ossetia without being given a green light by Washington.

    Georgia has embarked on a very dangerous course, and it’s important to realize it hasn’t done so alone. Saakashvili has the implicit backing of Washington in his quest to re-conquer the “lost” provinces of Ossetia and Abkhazia (and don’t forget Adjaria!) – or else what are 1,000 U.S. troops doing engaged in “joint military exercises” with the Georgian military, just as the crisis reaches crescendo of violence? (The Brits, to their credit, have thought better of getting dragged into this one…)

    It’s too bad Obama is going along with the game plan, but then again, he was never good on the Russian question to begin with, so I can’t say I’m disappointed. South Ossetia is not now a part of “sovereign Georgian territory,” and it hasn’t been for nearly two decades, no matter what McCain and Obama would have us believe. If they, along with GWB, are going to stand by Saakashvili’s side as he mows down civilians and imposes martial law on a war-torn, dirt-poor, and much-abused people, then may they all be damned to hell – that is, if we can find a rung low enough for them.

    It’s funny – if you like your humor black – but when Slobodan Milosevic was supposedly doing to Kosovo what Saakashvili is now doing to South Ossetia, the U.S. launched bombing raids and “liberated” the Kosovars from what we were told was to be a gruesome fate. There are many reasons to doubt that this attempted “genocide” ever took place, but given that something very bad was going on in the former Yugoslavia, one has to ask: why don’t the same standards apply to South Ossetia?

    I’ll tell you why: because the victims, this time, are Russians, Slavs who haven’t achieved official victim status in the lexicon of Western “humanitarians.”

    Imagine if, say, Colombia invaded Panama, and rained bombs down on the many U.S. citizens currently living there. Would the U.S. act to ensure their safety? You betcha! So somebody please tell me why Russia hasn’t the right to defend its own citizens, and even to deter and punish Georgian aggression.

    The War Party has been running on some pretty low energy lately, and this revival of the Cold War will no doubt recharge its batteries. The warmongers need a new enemy, a fresh face in their rogues’ gallery, to get the masses excited again, and Putin’s Russia fits the bill. I’ve been warning of this possibility for what seems like years, and now the moment is upon us. What’s interesting is how many left-liberal “peaceniks” are falling for the War Party’s guff and lining up behind McCain, their hero Obama, and the neocons in the march to confrontation with the Kremlin.

    The Russians have had enough of him. They might well be out for “regime change” in Georgia and frankly from what I’ve read in the last couple days (I’m not an expert on this area at all) they’re probably justified.

    Then there’s the Israeli connection. Israeli has been supplying arms and equipment and training the Georgian military. As I’ve always said, the “root of all evil” is not Iran, but Israel - at least as far as malignant political influence in the world is concerned.

    Who’s behind this? These articles tell you:

    Did the U.S. Prep Georgia for War with Russia?
    http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/08/did-us-military.html

    War in Georgia: The Israeli connection
    For past seven years, Israeli companies have been helping Gerogian army to preparer for war against Russia through arms deals, training of infantry units and security advice
    http://www.ynetnews.com/Ext/Comp/ArticleLayout/CdaArticlePrintPreview/1,2506,L-3580136,00.html

    The fact that Georgia’s defense minister, Davit Kezerashvili, is a former Israeli who is fluent in Hebrew contributed to this cooperation.

    Georgian minister: Israel should be proud

    “The Israelis should be proud of themselves for the Israeli training and education received by the Georgian soldiers,” Georgian Minister Temur Yakobashvili said Saturday.

    Yakobashvili is a Jew and is fluent in Hebrew. “We are now in a fight against the great Russia,” he said, “and our hope is to receive assistance from the White House, because Georgia cannot survive on its own.

    “It’s important that the entire world understands that what is happening in Georgia now will affect the entire world order. It’s not just Georgia’s business, but the entire world’s business.”

    One of the Georgian parliament members did not settle Saturday for the call for American aid, urging Israel to help stop the Russian offensive as well: “We need help from the UN and from our friends, headed by the United States and Israel. Today Georgia is in danger – tomorrow all the democratic countries in the region and in the entire world will be in danger too.”

  68. ALEJCARO Says:

    Do you all remember the Project for the New American Century? How America should swat down any potential challenges to her authority? Cheney and his neocons are going ape-shit because a country has dared to act in such a way as to not be intimidated by the neocon ideology. Cheney and his neo cons remind me of the story of the dog that chased a car barking furiously, but when it caught up to the car, the dog didn’t know what to do with it.

  69. sirko Says:

    “If Kristol really thinks we should go to war with Russia, he’s being crazy and irresponsible”.

    Russia is once again using military force to conquer neighboring countries. If the U.S. allows this to happen in the 21st century, THAT would be really crazy. And really stupid.

  70. Hector Says:

    If Georgia had the right to secede from the SOviet Union, then why the hell don’t the Ossetes have the right to secede from Georgia?

    Georgia is part of Russia’s sphere of influence. Our intervention to put in power the genocidal scumbag Saakashvili was utterly shameful and Russia is well within their rights to teach him a lesson. Did you notice when Saakashvili compared himself to Beria? Putin deserves the thanks of the Russian people for standing up against parasitic capitalists and Western imperialism. Only a strong Russia can protect East Europe, the Caucasus and Central Asia from the twin evils of Western imperialism and Islamic jihadism.

  71. Hector Says:

    The strength of the Russian people, more than anything else, is that history and geography have taught them how to suffer and how to endure. The world is now entering an era of global resource shortages and horrendously rapid climate change in which generalized calamity, disaster, and shortage will become the general condition for all the world’s peoples. In such an environment, there is a good chance that the United States and Western Europe, accustomed as they are to wealth and comfort, will not be able to weather the storm particularly well, and will fall into severe internal strife. Russia, on the other hand, will weather this storm as she has weathered so many storms before, and will emerge as the great power of the new era.

  72. kneeltplula Says:

    安吉县和锦竹工艺品厂位于著名的”中国竹乡”浙江安吉境内。安吉群山环绕,竹海千里,环境优美,是国内竹资源最丰富的地区之一。本着资源和环境的优势,企业生产服装箱包时尚竹木配饰.竹礼品.竹日用品.竹家居.竹园艺等安吉竹工艺品,都属于环保型产品。企业拥有经过严格的防霉和防蛀处理的优质原材料和从日本,台湾地区进口的先进竹木加工机械设备,实力雄厚。企业还拥有一批高级技术人员组成的管理班子,一支强大的设计队伍,对产品精益求精。在当今正规和透明的市场时代,企业恪守”客户第一.不断创新.优良的售后服务”的经营理念,以安吉和锦的真正实力,带给广大消费者优质的产品和优良的服务。安吉和锦高质量的产品在日本、美国、欧洲、中东等很多地区深受客户喜爱。欢迎新老客户惠顾!

  73. xiaoselang Says:

    提供工业除湿机除湿机加湿器工业除湿机压缩机空压机空压机空气压缩机螺杆式空压机变压器干式变压器干式变压器电力变压器变压器生产线流水线生产线流水线水处理净水设备精密铸造竹炭气动调节阀电动调节阀婚纱摄影节能灯机票查询无缝管焊管雷蒙磨选矿设备输送机滚筒皮带机输送机输送设备床上用品床垫羽绒羽绒被离心机烘箱商标代理实验台实验室家具通风柜实验室设备实验室家具黄金投资黄金现货如何炒黄金黄金交易黄金买卖板式换热器冷却器高低温试验箱加热器会议公司会议中心链条链条干燥机压滤机混合机粉碎机干燥机[url]

  74. RIsEoben Says:

    SEO ZONE is a search engine optimization(seo) firm, provides seo, seo article, seo tools,seo news and seo related informations,helping companies leverage the internet to increase revenues and profits.

  75. sexytirosys Says:

    http://www.sextir.com is a free porn videos site - We provide the world with free: porn videos,porn movies,xxx free movies,free porn,free sex.
    Best porn hub and tube on the web

  76. fluottunals Says:

    Funny foto here

  77. Axjjhdgy Says:

  78. shanghaiyiyuan Says:

    尿频尿痛尿道畸形尿道下裂淋病淋菌性尿道炎梅毒梅毒的治疗如何治疗梅毒尿道炎症状尿路感染慢性淋病慢性前列腺炎尿路感染的症状男性尿道炎尿道炎阴虱阴虱病非淋尿道炎非淋菌性尿道炎阴虱的治疗阴虱病的治疗阴虱的治疗方法阴虱治疗非淋性尿道炎尿频是怎么回事膀胱炎尿道炎治疗非淋菌性尿道炎治疗扁平湿疣梅毒的治疗方法小便出血男性生殖疾病男性尿道炎的症状尿分叉尿道炎吃什么药尿道口红肿尿频的原因尿急尿频尿急尿路感染吃什么药治疗阴虱阴虱图片非淋菌性尿道炎用药非淋什么是淋病淋病的治疗淋病的症状性病血精预防早泄射精快怎么办早泄怎么治早泄治疗治疗早泄最快方法防止早泄梅毒病梅毒的初期症状梅毒治疗不射精的原因性心理障碍不孕不育的原因男性不育症性传播疾病逆行射精射精障碍生殖系统疾病一期梅毒梅毒的临床表现霉毒梅毒症状梅毒的症状梅毒潜伏期[url],

  79. wow gold Says:

    This is good news! wow gold

  80. Speplayantevy Says:

  81. xCortSoolf Says:

    I know a web-site where there is a silver twice the return. I can give the link. http://mefmmzgv.goodaddress.eu/new-yorka9/map.html

  82. ruik xdlhw Says:

    twyune airvlmed sfyvp izeva jxlbdia pqhvgkl fhgvtzcq

  83. teemeardant Says:

    CIF Chip Cam Driver need help.?ciao a tutti. sto provando ad utilizzare il programma Aptana per modificare pagine HTTFP e creare pagine web.
    vi spiego il mio problema: quando apro il mio file, il programma mi fa vedere la sorgente (e li posso modificare tranquillamente), mentre se visualizzo il file per come ?? graficamente e cerco di modificarlo il programma non me lo lascia fare.
    in pratica riesco a modificare solo il codice del file… mi sembra un po’ strano.
    come faccio a lavorare sul file visto per quello che risulterebbe graficamente?
    vi chiedo scusa per il linguaggio poco comprensibile…
    grazie
    Chat Campania
    ____________
    buone ferie

  84. opvctymi ekxvqbflt Says:

    rukyb tkzbueqwh oaciwspbn mvyt eaxlt wachoi nmrjla

  85. ritofrify Says:

    Found this on another forum. Thought it might be use full. The website gives exact steps to get a free
    gold membership for the worlds largest dating service website.

    Free Membership

    Enjoy http://www.sharemyphotos.info/e/K.gif

  86. Jazonasoo Says:

    =”http://www.store4-4-3.info/where-to-buy-stride-rite-shoes.htm”> http://www.store4-4-3.info/where-to-buy-stride-rite-shoes.htm

  87. 滋賀 賃貸 Says:

    people would find 大阪市 北区 賃貸 it hard typing even with two hands on the Eee PC but the point of having the device is to have a secondary notebook instead of lugging around a huge laptop. While the Eee PC may have all the basic laptop functions, and then some, it is still primarily for quick document editing, Internet browsing and chat. Nevertheless, there are still some advanced functions that it could do. One in particular is video editing. Using software such as SolveigMM AVI Trimmer and MPEG Streamclip, I was able to edit and convert videos on the Eee PC. However, 大阪市 北区 賃貸 there was a noticeable lag but it was not enough to cause concern. In fact, while I was splicing videos together, I was already uploading one of them to a media sharing site.

  88. adsdsd Says:

    http://mason.recyclebagcentre.com/archives/29
    http://isaac.boxingmuaythai.com/archives/16

  89. justynianyo Says:

    This site is a guide that offers tips and hints about natural penis enlargement pills ,methods, informations.
    All Natural & Non-Surgical Remedies Enhance Your penis Size Guranteed.
    just take a look http://www.just4-sex.com penis enlargement site.

  90. inwowgold Says:

    HAPPY ENDINGwow power leveling

  91. engatiernhets Says:

    Hi, this PR2 site directory just opened: Nozokugallery Web Directory
    For a few days you get a one way link to your site.

    Go ahead and get one

    Greetings
    engatiernhets

  92. engatiernhets Says:

    Hello, this PR2 website directory just opened: Nozokugallery Web Directory
    For a few days you get a one way backlink to your site.

    Go ahead and get one

    Greetings
    engatiernhets

  93. SeekersISeek Says:

    Hello Guys,

    Greetings. Introducing me.

    By the way, I am looking for book I ching translated by Kerson Huang. I cannot find those book anywhere. Do you know where I can find those? Thanks

  94. BookSeekers Says:

    Hello Guys,

    Greetings. Introducing me.

    By the way, I am looking for book I ching translated by Kerson Huang. I cannot find those book anywhere. Do you know where I can find those? Thanks

  95. innogygroof Says:

    We promote our affiliates by offering their services to you. Yes, this site works, and yes, you CAN make money, just takes a few minutes of your time. If you think it’s too good to be true, think again. You get paid for offers you complete, then we credit the cash amount to you for your time and effort. No credit card required offers.

    Get paid to complete offers !

  96. wow gold Says:

    some thermocouple thermometer: multifuncion Thermocouple thermometer for export.
    power inverter,PC power inverter,machine power inverter.
    The proximity switches - we dealing in proximity switches, proximity switches provide

  97. SEO Says:

    SEO(検索エンジン最適化)とは、Yahoo!やGoogleなどの検索エンジンにおいて、上位表示させる技術。

  98. Wouppycof Says:

    Aiuto per un gioco del pC!!?codifico… e poi?
    Chat Molise
    ____________
    buon anno

  99. tramadol Says:

    tramadol
    If you have to do it, you might as well do it right

  100. wholesale jewelry Says:

    Good site,thank you!
    wholesale jewelry

  101. gzotd yixqtz Says:

    hrmtj hznpvdrcg borxyds ohelcrabx syhl ixdhn csqalxuyi

  102. アダルトDVD Says:

    good job. thanks for all

  103. 中古ビデオ Says:

    Very nice article! Thanks for this!

  104. John1650 Says:

    Very nice site! cheap viagra

  105. John1650 Says:

    Very nice site! cheap cialis http://yieapxo.com/qroxrrq/4.html

  106. John1650 Says:

    Very nice site!

  107. brand viagra Says:

    Excellent site. It was pleasant to me.
    buy cheap viagra

  108. viagra brand Says:

    Very interesting site. Hope it will always be alive!
    cheap brand pfizer viagra

  109. cheap viagra Says:

    thanks !! very helpful post!
    viagra

  110. John1290 Says:

    Very nice site! cheap cialis http://apxoiey.com/aoxrxx/4.html

  111. John1290 Says:

    Very nice site!

  112. John1290 Says:

    Very nice site! cheap viagra

  113. John1290 Says:

    Very nice site! [url=http://apxoiey.com/aoxrxx/2.html]cheap cialis[/url]

  114. cza Says:

    [URL=http://aniki1.ps.land.to/]産後バスト[/URL]
    [URL=http://goldmans.55street.net/]日記[/URL]

  115. x3d154e Says:

    8ed72a | [url=http://19f3ea.com]4e2549[/url] | [link=http://68af8a.com]5777ae[/link] | http://69173e.com | 8caef4 | [http://d41852.com e48ff1]

  116. SEO Says:

    SEOSEO対策レーシックレーシックレーシックインプラントFXFXFXキャッシングキャッシング家庭教師美容整形エステレンタルサーバーオークションサプリメント生命保険自動車保険医療保険年金保険ガン保険介護保険学資保険終身保険傷害保険生命保険クレジットカードビジネスマナーサイト売買バイク買取インテリア投資信託


Jump to Top

About Wonk Room | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2008 Center for American Progress Action Fund
imageRegisterimageimageRSSimageimageimage image
image
Advertisement

Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
image 

Books By Matthew Yglesias
Book Cover

Heads in the Sand

Buy the book


imageTopic Cloud


Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report




Contact Matthew Yglesias
Use this form to contact blog author Matthew Yglesias.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll


imageAbout Matt YglesiasimageimageContact MeimageimageDonateimage