Matt Yglesias

Aug 22nd, 2008 at 12:48 pm

Clear Skies Over Beijing

Beijing Sky
You sometimes hear that the Chinese will never act to reduce their carbon emissions no matter what anyone says or does. It’s possible, but I have my doubts. Take a look at James Fallows’ compare-and-contrast photos of Beijing air quality dramatizing the huge achievements made possible by emergency Olympics-related air quality measures. It seems to me that Chinese people have to be thinking that it might be nice to start taking steps to ensure they can enjoy air this clean all the time.






27 Responses to “Clear Skies Over Beijing”

  1. McKingford Says:

    Except that the “Chinese people” have no real say in the matter, and voicing anything but the party line gets you a one way ticket to “re-education through labour” camp…

  2. Eamonn Says:

    After the Olympics, I’m sort of afraid that it doesn’t matter what the Chinese people want, especially in the short term. They’d also probably prefer that their houses weren’t mowed down to make way for the Bird’s Nest and that their government didn’t subvert their supposed protest zones. Or maybe not. But either way, they don’t seem to have the efficacy to change it.

  3. David J. Balan Says:

    The issue of local urban air pollution is very different from the issue of global warming. It’s a lot easier to see China doing something about the former than the latter.

  4. bdbd Says:

    Clean up China’s air by holding a never ending “edgeless” Olympics in Beijing!

  5. joe Says:

    um, don’t count on it. 10 kuai says that the pictures of Beijing three months from now look much like the ones from three months ago.

  6. daveNYC Says:

    Those emergency measures were pretty hard core though. Even-odd driving days and shutting down factories aren’t easily sustainable. It’s not like they installed more air scrubbers in the stacks or built more mass transit.

  7. asl Says:

    No expert, but didn’t China pretty much have to use their authoritative rule to shut down factories, coal mines, and ration driving to get that cleaner air? So they’ll continue those economic-hindering policies after the Olympics?

  8. A.S. Says:

    It seems to me that Chinese people have to be thinking that it might be nice to start taking steps to ensure they can enjoy air this clean all the time.

    Why in the world would the Chinese have to be thinking that??? That seems like a very American point of view.

    If I were a bettor, I’d bet that the Chinese are thinking “how soon until these Olympic restrictions end so I can go back to driving my new (polluting) car and working in my (polluting) factory to make a living?”

  9. asl Says:

    It seems to me that Chinese people have to be thinking that it might be nice to start taking steps to ensure they can enjoy air this clean all the time.

    Sorry, but forgot. bwa hahahaha.

  10. McKingford Says:

    It’s not like they installed more air scrubbers in the stacks or built more mass transit

    Actually, that’s not true. In the days just before the Olympics, they opened up a huge new subway line, to considerable praise. But your general point stands.

  11. mark Says:

    the occasional clear sky probably has more to do with local weather/wind patterns than any measures the chinese have taken: http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/2008/08/how-beijing-com.html

  12. Craig Says:

    Of _course_ it matters to some extent what the Chinese people want–why else has the government put so much work into improving material standards of living for people? They could keep everyone housed in barracks and wearing identical Mao suits if public desires were of zero importance in China. It’s noting like here in the West, of course, but it is quite foolish to pretend that the Chinese people get absolutely no say in setting priorities and policies.

    One thing that is conspicuous about China versus our corner of the world is that there is so little protection for the rights and interests of “minorities.” I put that word in quotes because I don’t just mean racial or ethnic minorities (although they get their share of kicks to the head in China), but any sort of population sub-set that can be conceptually split off from “the people.”

    Villagers who are in the way of the Three Gorges dam…Shopowners who are in the way of the Bird’s Nest…pet owners whenever there’s any kind of disease outbreak…all of them become “minorities” when their interests are opposed to the majority, and all are kicked to the curb in the most appalling manner. You remember how those opening ceremonies were focused on the word “harmony?” Not “liberty,” not “freedom,” but “harmony?” There ya go. Minorities of any kind are dis-harmonious.

    At the moment, popular sentiment in China seems to be focused on rapid acquisition of material goods, and the environment can look after itself. But there was a time, and not long ago, when that was the sentiment here in the US. Sentiments can shift, and if the Chinese start to value clean air above lots of cars, car owners can turn into a scorned and abused minority, too.

    Will two weeks of clean air in Beijing be enough to start that kind of shift in opinion? I wouldn’t bet on it–but you never know.

  13. a guy Says:

    Take a look at James Fallows’ compare-and-contrast photos of Beijing air quality dramatizing the huge achievements made possible by emergency Olympics-related air quality measures.

    And fortuitous wind patterns…

  14. angler Says:

    This just shows you can’t hit a bulls eye with every post. To add to those who checked the weather forecasts, casual Olympic viewing yesterday showed lots of rain in Beijing. Anyone living in LA and environs or another smog center knows that the skies are always clearer after it rains. Not the same for the streets, as they the sewers get all the dirt that’s just washed down from on high.

  15. Mayhem Says:

    I’ve been to beijing around the same time two years ago. It was shitty until the winds from the west picked up. Then it was beautiful for weeks. I don’t think it has to do with anything the chinese gov’t did for the olympics.

  16. ed Says:

    Um, Matt, Carbon Dioxide isn’t the kind of “polution” that makes you sick. Cleaning up the particulates and such is entirely consistent with putting *more* carbon into the atmosphere…you just need to burn the fuels more cleanly and efficiently.

    The Los Angeles area has much much better air quality than it did 30 years ago, but it also emits more carbon. I’d expect a similar trajectory in China.

  17. Craig McGillivary Says:

    I think the danger is that China will clean up the non-Carbon air pollution which is most noticable and immediately damaging while at the same time it doesn’t reduce CO2 emissions. That is after all what we did. Also there is a possible danger called Global Dimming. Basically whatever the health effects of the non carbon polutants they seem to actually partially counter the effects of CO2. This means that if they just clean up the non carbon air pollution it will actually make things worse.

  18. Selina Says:

    wow. that is so crazy. i thought this could never be possible since the chinese government is so ‘ stubborn ‘. i remember being in Beijing one year ago and just thinking: how could anybody live in these conditions?! i just got headaches all the time from the pollution. i feel like this is such a great change and that it shows other countries that it IS possible and it CAN be done. that even pollution of such a big and populated city can be changed. i also agree with what Craig McGillivary says though about the CO2 emissions…but oh well. :[

  19. cialis Says:

    cialis
    I bookmarked this site. Thank you for good job!

  20. viagra Says:

    Excellent site. It was pleasant to me.

  21. zyban Says:

    Great site. Good info

  22. tramadol Says:

    Very interesting site. Hope it will always be alive!
    tramadol

  23. tramadol Says:

    tramadol
    It is the coolest site,keep so!

  24. brand viagra Says:

    I bookmarked this site. Thank you for good job!
    buy cheap viagra

  25. viagra cheap Says:

    I bookmarked this site, Thank you for good job!
    viagra


Jump to Top

About Wonk Room | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2008 Center for American Progress Action Fund
imageRegisterimageimageRSSimageimageimage image
image
Advertisement

Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
image 

Books By Matthew Yglesias
Book Cover

Heads in the Sand

Buy the book


imageTopic Cloud


Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report




Contact Matthew Yglesias
Use this form to contact blog author Matthew Yglesias.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll


imageAbout Matt YglesiasimageimageContact MeimageimageDonateimage