Learning The Rules
Chris Sheridan notes that LeBron James opened Team USA’s exhibition game against Turkey with a FIBA move, swatting a ball that had hit the rim and was likely to bound into the hoop away from the basket. That’s goaltending in America, but legitimate defense under FIBA rules.
That seems like an important step to me. Over the past few years, I’ve consistently thought that the fact that the rules have been an underplayed problem for American teams in international competitions — it’s hard when our guys are playing under unfamiliar rules that their opponents are familiar with. But it seems that this year the players and the coaching staff are putting more emphasis on getting people to think about how the FIBA ruleset should effect their behavior.
49 Responses to “Learning The Rules”
Register
RSSLogin
Topic Cloud
ArchivesBlog RollAbout Matt YglesiasContact Me
Donate
July 31st, 2008 at 7:35 pm
LeBron’s a very, very smart player, which might be the most overlooked/underappreciated thing about him.
Hell, everything about him is underappreciated. He’s the best player in the world, people! The best player since Jordan was in his prime! Wake up!
July 31st, 2008 at 7:41 pm
After having watched LBJ play 7 versus the Celtics – aka the best defense in the world right now – and then watched Kobe play 6 versus the Celtics, it was quite clear:
LBJ is the best basketball player in the world.
Crazy thing is, he’s only like 22 and still has a ton of room for improvement. (Like, learning how not to let Paul Pierce go for 41 in Game 7).
As to FIBA rules, nice post Yglesias, finally talking some sense about basketball.
You’d think that a guy like Dwight Howard could just take every shot off the rim, funny it was LeBron who was doing it.
Hopefully guys like Mr. Guarantee D Wade remember that it’s still defense that wins championships, and Gold Medals.
July 31st, 2008 at 8:01 pm
Wait, you’re allowed to pull a ball out the goal if it’s bouncing around on the rim? Won’t our guys be able to do that, like, every time a ball bounces on the rim? There’s a reason it’s illegal in the NBA, and I think so…
July 31st, 2008 at 8:24 pm
“Hell, everything about him is underappreciated”
It is odd that someone at his level could be underrated, but he is.
July 31st, 2008 at 8:28 pm
I wonder how far away we are from having all basketball played under one set of rules. I’m not familiar with FIBA much… I guess I’ve gleaned that it’s less friendly towards the post game. Basketball is becoming pretty darn popular around the world.
July 31st, 2008 at 8:31 pm
But will the image of black players decked out in USA shirts kicking foreigner ass on behalf of Joe-Six-Pack help Obama? I think yes!
July 31st, 2008 at 8:48 pm
So I take it you want to see a return to the good old days, when a “Dream Team” with a talent gap larger than the nuclear warhead gap between the U.S. and Iran was elbowing Angolans into the first row and winning by video game margins? How stirring.
July 31st, 2008 at 8:51 pm
“Wait, you’re allowed to pull a ball out the goal if it’s bouncing around on the rim? Won’t our guys be able to do that, like, every time a ball bounces on the rim?”
Well, let’s hope so. I don’t think there are too many Dwight Howard types in Europe, as every 7-footer there appears to be white, not all that athletic, and focused on mastering their 15-foot jumper.
July 31st, 2008 at 8:55 pm
“I wonder how far away we are from having all basketball played under one set of rules.”
Likely still quite far, but the NBA’s abolition of the zone ban in the early part of the decade was a first step towards harmonization.
July 31st, 2008 at 8:58 pm
“Well, let’s hope so. I don’t think there are too many Dwight Howard types in Europe”
Dwight Howard types are a lot less valuable under FIBA rules than they are under association rules.
July 31st, 2008 at 9:06 pm
Why is that, Petey? (Honest question, I never quite got why the seemingly minor FIBA/NBA differences change the game so profoundly, as they clearly do).
July 31st, 2008 at 9:16 pm
“Why is that, Petey?”
I have only vague ideas. Seen many association rules games and few FIBA rules games. A bigger lane and different lane rules is part of it. Depreciation of the low post game for other reasons is another part.
Harder to figure out for me is why Carmelo is so much more elite in FIBA ball than he is in the association.
July 31st, 2008 at 9:28 pm
Why is that, Petey? (Honest question, I never quite got why the seemingly minor FIBA/NBA differences change the game so profoundly, as they clearly do).
Well for one thing, it’s damn near impossible to do any kind of power move in the paint without getting an offensive foul called on you. Just ask Tim Duncan.
I love that team USA is using the trap more these days. Makes it harder for teams to set up zone defenses if you can get plenty of fast breaks. How many international 2-guards can bring the ball up the floor against an NBA press?
July 31st, 2008 at 9:35 pm
Yeah, they seem to insist that Carmelo is the ideal forward under FIBA rules. I don’t quite understand it, but I’m looking forward to watching as many Olympic games as possible. I supposed a lot of it has to do with being a very good mid-range jump shooter. The FIBA 3 pointer is closer to a long mid-range jump shot than an NBA three. A colleg jump shot, really. And when you think about it, Carmelo’s game is pretty much below the rim, relatively speaking, but he’s able to create offense in a lot of ways.
Or maybe I’m completely full of shit. I don’t know anything about FIBA.
July 31st, 2008 at 9:49 pm
now that sports illustrated has put its full archives on line, it is my self-appointed duty as an old-timer to drift down memory lane and remember relevant articles.
as, for example, within his salute to bill bradley as the best college player in the ‘64 preseason writeup, frank deford wrote this:
Bradley was the only U.S. player smart and flexible enough to convert his style to take advantage of the international rules, which so favor an aggressive offense.
http://vault.sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1076689/2/index.htm
i have no idea how the ‘64 rules compares to now, btw, but i cite this simply to note it’s an old issue. (it probably mattered less in ‘64, when the US dominance in basketball was higher than it is now).
July 31st, 2008 at 11:27 pm
“I wonder how far away we are from having all basketball played under one set of rules.”
Huh. I was just told that FIBA is adopting the NBA rectangular lane after this Olympics is over. So maybe harmonization really is on a faster track than I was assuming.
July 31st, 2008 at 11:56 pm
Well, if I remember the scheduling correctly, Matthew is mere minutes away from formally shifting from being a dishonest political writer to being an honest propagandist.
That probably means I can’t bash him anymore, since I approve of CAP’s general mission just as much as I’ve disapproved of Matt’s mission here over the past six months.
But we’ll always have Primary Season ‘08. I’ll make the T-Shirts.
And remember, the first rule of Fight Club is that if you keep saying during March and April that continuing to have big rallies is a bad idea for your candidate’s brand, going on to have the biggest rally of all in Berlin in July may not be the absolutely best of ideas.
August 1st, 2008 at 12:22 am
I was just told that FIBA is adopting the NBA rectangular lane after this Olympics is over. So maybe harmonization really is on a faster track than I was assuming.
Not until after the 2010 FIBA World Championships, apparently. They’re also bringing out the 3-point line to 6.75m (a little wider than the NBA line at the corners).
You’ll definitely get basketball harmonization before you get the NHL and Olympic hockey played on the same size rink. Can’t be taking away seats.
August 1st, 2008 at 4:56 am
LBJ is the best basketball player in the world.
August 1st, 2008 at 5:38 am
This idea of having US basketball players play under international rules is yet another example of the recent Administration turn to so-called “pragmatist” lily-livered appeasement approaches. If I were still there on the IOC, we’d respect American primacy and there would be two sets of rules for the two teams in US vs. Anybody games. And that’s the way it should be.
Sincerely,
John Bolton
August 1st, 2008 at 6:10 am
O/T: A U.S. Army-employed (civilian) scientist about to be charged in the 2001 anthrax attacks committed suicide.
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/front/la-na-anthrax1-2008aug01,0,3772533.story
August 1st, 2008 at 6:33 am
At least PiriketSeverler stays on topic, El Cid.
Or are you implying that Michael Redd was responsible for the anthrax attack?
August 1st, 2008 at 6:38 am
Petey: Truly, another lesson that should have been learned is how easy attacks & the like are. And no amount of blowing up of other nations will reduce that ease.
August 1st, 2008 at 7:06 am
“And no amount of blowing up of other nations will reduce that ease.”
I advise you not to watch the Olympic basketball competition if that’s your attitude. We’re going to blow up other nations’ teams real good.
August 1st, 2008 at 7:22 am
On the plus side: although the Hatfill boondoggle set the investigation back, if correct, the Ivins charges indicate that federal investigators were both right from the beginning that the attacks came out of Fort Detrick, and this information became publicly available.
Why is this a possible plus? At least it wasn’t a foreign-based attack whose source went undetected (presuming no collaboration with the new suspect), nor could such reasonably be charged, although granted that in 2002-2003, the term “reasonable” had little meaning in the absolutely insane time back then.
———–
Hopefully you’re right about the O-team, but at least the games (IIRC) are now frequently close competitions.
August 1st, 2008 at 7:43 am
“At least it wasn’t a foreign-based attack whose source went undetected “
I think everyone disqualified that possibility within weeks. From very early on, it was pretty obviously either a lone scientist wacko or a black op done by our own security services, ala the Russian apartment bombings.
Y’know Bush and Cheney may have run an undeniably shitty administration, but they seem to have basically upheld their oath of office. I’m grateful for small favors.
Now all we have to hope is that no one in Fort Detrick is playing with ice-nine that some lone scientist wacko can make his plaything.
August 1st, 2008 at 8:06 am
As Atrios reminds us, yes, although rational people seemed to rule out a foreign-sourced anthrax attack, remember, at that time the Cheney / Jr brigades were building the Iraq attack, so, yes, they claimed that too:
August 1st, 2008 at 8:06 am
I assume that the reason that NBA players don’t swipe more such shots off the rim in FIBA play is not lack of knowledge of the rules, but learned reflex (bordering on instinct) accumulated over multiple years of American high school, college and NBA playing.
Also, was that it? Was that Matt’s last post here?
August 1st, 2008 at 8:12 am
“As Atrios reminds us, yes, although rational people seemed to rule out a foreign-sourced anthrax attack, remember, at that time the Cheney / Jr brigades were building the Iraq attack, so, yes, they claimed that too:”
Indeed, which is why I thought and feared it was a black op at the time…
August 1st, 2008 at 11:59 am
D Wade’s apparent return to health & 2005 form is as important to Team USA as any newly-ingrained appreciation of FIBA rules.
August 1st, 2008 at 2:47 pm
You are only good to the extent you help your team. Individual statistics are less meaningful. (This is why Russell was much better than Chamberlain.) LeBron helps his team, but not as much as, say, Paul Pierce helps his team. That’s why the Celtics are NBA champs and when LeBron got to the NBA finals, he got his butt handed to him.
So no, LeBron isn’t underrated. Like most “superstar” players, he is overrated, because the aspects of play that get one hailed as a “superstar” have limited utility in a team sport.
August 1st, 2008 at 4:53 pm
Dilan,
I’m sorry, are you saying that LeBron James doesn’t help his team as much as Paul Pierce helps his? Is that a fucking joke? You obviously no nothing about basketball. He is a better passer, scorer and rebounder than Paul Pierce. Paul Pierce is a better on-ball defender. The reason Boston won this year and Cleveland lost last year is because the Celtics had a MUCH BETTER TEAM. KG was fourth in MVP voting for fuck’s sake. Really, yours is the dumbest basketball post I’ve ever seen on MY’s blog. Good luck.
August 1st, 2008 at 4:57 pm
no=know
Sorry, my brain is still spinning from that post.
August 2nd, 2008 at 12:25 am
Stacy:
Statistics don’t measure how much a player helps his team. Most one-on-one scoring is extremely inefficient, because usually someone else on the team had an equal or better chance of scoring on the possession. Assists are fine, but so are screens, but nobody gets a stat for setting a screen. Rebounds are fine if they reflect playing in position or obtaining a rebound on a possession that would have otherwise gone to the other team, but total rebounds is practically meaningless.
Meanwhile, the most important part of the game, the part that wins championships, defense, is not measured accurately by conventional statistics. (Blocks and steals are only a limited portion of what a good player does on defense.)
LeBron is a statistical superstar. That’s what draws a high salary in the NBA. That is not, however, what wins. The ideal situation is a team that has balanced scoring, and players who are willing to sublimate their stat counts for the team. “Superstars” are of limited usefulness unless they are willing to do that. That’s why Ron Harper was a better player with the Bulls and Lakers than he was with the Clippers and Cavs, despite the fact that his numbers were much better at the latter two named teams.
Getting bowled over by statistics– and especially offensive statistics, as very few games are actually won on offense– is simply being distracted from what is really important.
Until LeBron starts doing more things that don’t show up in stat sheets and playing more team oriented ball, he cannot be considered underrated.
August 3rd, 2008 at 10:05 am
Shorter Dilan Esper:
Rajon Rondo is a better point guard than Chris Paul because Boston won the championship and New Orleans didn’t. The fact that Rondo’s stats are worse than Paul’s is further confirmation that Rondo is better than Paul.
August 3rd, 2008 at 10:10 am
“Really, yours is the dumbest basketball post I’ve ever seen on MY’s blog.”
I wouldn’t go that far. There was some Bulls’ fan who kept insisting here that Ben Gordon was the best shooting guard in the league.
Dilan Esper’s post may indeed be one of the top 10 dumbest posts, (it really is pretty dumb), but it’s probably not the single dumbest one.
August 3rd, 2008 at 10:27 am
And finally, I’ll add that not only is LeBron pretty obviously the most valuable player in the association, but the gap between him and the pack is wider than has been the case with anyone since MJ in the mid-90’s.
November 16th, 2008 at 1:32 pm
LBJ is the best basketball player in the world.
November 22nd, 2008 at 4:33 am
Bir kod da Sen Koy!
İnternetin Sosyallaştığı Site
http://www.htmlcentre.tr.gg
March 1st, 2009 at 5:23 am
viagra
If you have to do it, you might as well do it right
March 2nd, 2009 at 4:46 am
levitraGreat site. Good info
March 11th, 2009 at 4:31 am
Very interesting site. Hope it will always be alive!
March 17th, 2009 at 2:24 am
Very interesting site. Hope it will always be alive!
tramadol
March 22nd, 2009 at 6:05 am
tramadol
Incredible site!
March 22nd, 2009 at 10:23 am
buy viagra online
It is the coolest site,keep so!
April 2nd, 2009 at 5:08 am
Incredible site!
buy cheap viagra
April 3rd, 2009 at 4:06 am
I want to say – thank you for this!
cheap brand pfizer viagra
April 9th, 2009 at 5:19 am
I bookmarked this site, Thank you for good job! viagra
April 20th, 2009 at 1:04 am
2DMFf5 iyxqiikslxsk, [url=http://avhziwexcmpy.com/]avhziwexcmpy[/url], [link=http://mibsycebcyzj.com/]mibsycebcyzj[/link], http://tjfhwjneufza.com/