The Partisans
[Matt]
Via Larison, some interesting polling from GQR for NPR. They test some different Democratic and Republican messages head-to-head. And they do them two ways. In one round, each message starts “Democrats say…” or “Republicans say…” whereas a different batch of people get the message test with just “some people say…”
In all instances, the Democratic message beats the Republican message fairly badly. But identifying the Democratic message as “Democrats say…” uniformly results in a slight decrease in its popularity whereas identifying the Republican message as “Republicans say” slightly increases the message’s popularity. I’m not 100 percent sure how to interpret that — on the one hand, it speaks to some enduring strengths of the GOP brand, but on the other hand the Republican messages poor very poorly overall so their brand is hardly in good shape.
43 Responses to “The Partisans”
Register
RSSLogin
Topic Cloud
ArchivesBlog RollAbout Matt YglesiasContact Me
Donate
May 30th, 2008 at 4:22 pm
Seems pretty simple to me.
What’s happening is that not only do virtually all Democrats prefer the Democrat’s messages, a lot of Republicans do as well. However, when you identify the messages as being Democratic or Republican, some of those Republicans “realize” what they’re doing and fall back to their party ID.
May 30th, 2008 at 4:24 pm
I’d guess that what’s going on here is that you have some Republican respondents who, absent any partisan identification of the message, dislike it. However, once they hear that it’s a Republican message, they decide to support it simply because it’s labeled ‘Republican’ (or when they hear it’s a ‘Democratic’ message, they have a more negative view of it). Basically, the label is providing signaling to these individuals.
The question would be why Democratic respondents seem to not be responding to the signaling (if they were, the effects would cancel each other out, assuming an equal number of Republican and Democratic poll respondents).
May 30th, 2008 at 4:25 pm
I’d guess that what’s going on here is that you have some Republican respondents who, absent any partisan identification of the message, dislike it. However, once they hear that it’s a Republican message, they decide to support it simply because it’s labeled ‘Republican’ (or when they hear it’s a ‘Democratic’ message, they have a more negative view of it). Basically, the label is providing signaling to these individuals.
The question would be why Democratic respondents seem to not be responding to the signaling (if they were, the effects would cancel each other out, assuming an equal number of Republican and Democratic poll respondents).
May 30th, 2008 at 4:26 pm
Off the top of my head, if the Democrats are doing better than Republicans, then the “swing” group consists of Republicans or Republican leaners (since the population is approximately evenly divided), so it’s only natural that some of them prefer the Republican brand and revert to it (o away from the Democratic brand) when it is identified.
May 30th, 2008 at 4:28 pm
The question would be why Democratic respondents seem to not be responding to the signaling
I would assume that’s because (virtually) all of the Democrats already agree with the Democratic messages; in other words, there are no Democrats left to signal.
May 30th, 2008 at 4:36 pm
Hmm. . . Republicans in a nutshell: “We don’t like your brand, but we like your product even less”?
May 30th, 2008 at 4:54 pm
Actually, Al, I don’t think any Democrat is proposing repealing Bush’s modest tax cuts for the middle class, though I agree that middle-class tax relief hardly qualifies as a Democratic message either. What Democrats are proposing this year is a rollback of the Bush tax cuts on the highest earners, not the middle class. More accurately, they’d let the cuts expire as they were originally scheduled to do.
There may be some modest middle class tax cuts in there too, but both parties like to pander with reckless tax cuts these days.
May 30th, 2008 at 4:57 pm
I hear McCain is going for the all-out alpha male vote during his jaunt across the West by wearing a squirrel pelt plastered to the side of his head by a rubber band, banging a gong whenever he walks through a door, and restricting his diet to boar jerky and corn liquor. Goes along with his whole “we don’t talk to our enemies – we sulk, then we bomb them” theme.
May 30th, 2008 at 5:05 pm
First, I’d say just take the numbers, regardless of the registration of the people polled. In other words, on the whole, Democratic views scored higher than Republican views until the affiliation was known, then the difference decreased. I’d caution not to look too closely at the party affiliation of the responders, because many everyday (read: non-politically involved) people choose a party without much thought, or with a logic that would be foreign to all of us.
Overall, this means the Republican “brand” is actually stronger than the Democratic “brand.” It looks like years of right-wing radio bashing and poor representation in the media has taken its toll on the Democratic “brand.” In my world this is backed up by experience: most of the non-politically interested people I know consider the Democrats to be corrupt, weak, and spineless. They despise Democrats even when the Dems’ message is more in line with their own. They tend to think of Carter as the prototype Dem, followed by Bill Clinton. They see both as weak, with Clinton having the additional label of being corrupt. They may be planning to vote for a Dem this fall, but only to punish the ineptness of the current administration (Bush), and the guy they see as its ally (McCain).
Fortunately for Dems, the Democratic reality (their positions) is more in-line with people than are the Republican positions. This suggests that the Democratic candidate (Obama) could run a campaign based on being against the “typical Washington Democrat,” even if he still holds relatively typical Democratic positions…and succeed.
Dems need to distance themselves from the brand in some way. That may mean starting to talk about “old-school Dems” or “Clinton-style Dems,” whatever it takes to create a separation between the Dems of today and the Dems of old. They need to create a new brand for Democrats, which will likely mean tossing the old one under the bus. In my opinion, they should start to actively and publicly attack the representatives of the old-style Democrat to create this separation.
May 30th, 2008 at 5:06 pm
I crunched the numbers a bit. Stunning:
Republicans don’t like republican policies. But if you tell them it’s a republican policy, their support jumps by double digits.
For the Democrats, it’s *exactly the opposite* (but mostly by single digits).
Who’s got the branding problem?
A little table paints the picture:
http://trueconservative.typepad.com/trueconservative/2008/05/pubs-and-dems-brands-and-beliefs.html
May 30th, 2008 at 5:07 pm
Did they test poll a John McCain-Hillary Clinton ticket??
Hat tip to commenter Confidence Man in an earlier thread for raising this perverted –yet strangely fascinating — idea on his/her? web site.
May 30th, 2008 at 5:11 pm
You didn’t need to put your name on this one, Matt.
“…but on the other hand the Republican messages poor very poorly overall so their brand is hardly in good shape,” pretty clearly identified you as the author. Not one of your worst sentences, not by far, but still identifiably yours.
May 30th, 2008 at 5:15 pm
You know that John McCain is going to suggest it — after getting Hillary liquored up like he did on that Balkan trip.
And you know Hillary is gonna respond like a Wellesley girl responding to her frat date’s suggestion of oral sex — a sigh of reluctance, a token sign of being repulsed just to keep up appearances , and then lungeing like a spring trout on a fly.
May 30th, 2008 at 5:20 pm
Here’s my take: When you hear “Democrats say X”, the pit of your stomach knows that X is never going to actually be enacted: It’ll be filibustered, or vetoed, or swiftboated, or hollowed out by lobbyists, or perhaps George Bush will say “boo” and everyone will run for cover. When you hear “Republicans say Y”, you know that Y has a very good chance — a frighteningly good chance, in most cases — of actually coming to pass… if only because “Republicans say Y” is MSM-speak for “very powerful elites want Y to happen, and/or they know that Y is inevitable and they want credit for being on the side of Y.”
Such is the outcome of years of Pavlovian training. It will take time and effort to reverse this.
May 30th, 2008 at 5:23 pm
OT … Steve Roth, what do you think of Peter Viereck?
May 30th, 2008 at 5:23 pm
I don’t see how this should come as a surprise to anyone. The Democratic Party and “liberals” have had a negatively associated, weak brand for a long time now, while the GOP and “conservatives” have had a positively-associated, strong brand.
Furthermore, the negative association with the Democratic Party is so extremely strong with Republicans, that I’d bet that they discount much more a policy when it’s identified with the opposition than do the Democrats. The result would be a much greater measured sensitivity to party identification of a policy.
Now, why the Dem brand has become so tarnished is another, and complex, matter. I’d guess that a large part of it is bad decisions and bad marketing on the part of Dems coupled with good decisions and very good marketing on the part of the GOP. Turning “liberal” into an insult is an excellent example.
May 30th, 2008 at 6:24 pm
Keith: “the negative association with the Democratic Party is so extremely strong with Republicans”
What’s astounding is that the negative-Dem meme so strong with Democrats! Tell a Dem that a policy they like is a Democratic policy, and they run the other way.
Check out the numbers–negative every time.
I actually think this has less to do with party brands, and far more to do with the character of constituents. Pubs are (more likely to be) authoritarian followers, while Dems are averse to being “joiners.”
May 31st, 2008 at 10:12 am
I think it’s because the policies are obviously being described by liberal Democrats. (There are all sorts of signs in the way the questions are posed.) Both Republicans AND Democrats, then, are applying a correction factor to account for their expectation that the questions are slanted to make Democratic positions sound better than they really are, and Republican positions worse.
November 16th, 2008 at 12:02 am
Penis Enlargement Pills, How to Suck Cock, Sex Secrets, Woman Masturbation, Penis Techniques, Sexual Performance, Sex Instructons & Positions. Visit: http://www.sinepenis.com
March 1st, 2009 at 5:25 am
viagra
I want to say – thank you for this!
March 12th, 2009 at 11:13 pm
Excellent site. It was pleasant to me.
March 17th, 2009 at 2:23 am
I want to say – thank you for this!
tramadol
March 22nd, 2009 at 6:05 am
tramadol
It is the coolest site,keep so!
April 2nd, 2009 at 5:10 am
Excellent site. It was pleasant to me.
buy cheap viagra
April 3rd, 2009 at 4:06 am
I bookmarked this site. Thank you for good job!
cheap brand pfizer viagra
April 8th, 2009 at 8:12 pm
I really liked your blog! i read 4 others that are on similar subjets, but they domt update very often, thanks.
April 8th, 2009 at 8:29 pm
I just found your blog on the google search engine and saw a few of your other posts that you had done . I just added you to my Google News Reader. Keep up the great work. i will Look forward to reading more from you again.
April 9th, 2009 at 5:23 am
I bookmarked this site, Thank you for good job! viagra
April 9th, 2009 at 6:17 am
Can you provide more information on this? i have read other websites that are on similar subjects.
April 9th, 2009 at 3:06 pm
My fellow on Orkut shared this link with me and I’m not dissapointed at all that I came to your blog.
April 14th, 2009 at 2:41 am
I really liked your blog! i read 4 others that are on similar subjets, but they domt update very often, thanks.
April 14th, 2009 at 2:45 am
Can you provide more information on this? i have read other websites that are on similar subjects.
April 16th, 2009 at 7:28 am
I really liked your blog! i read 4 others that are on similar subjets, but they domt update very often, thanks.
April 16th, 2009 at 7:50 am
Can you provide more information on this? i have read other websites that are on similar subjects.
April 16th, 2009 at 7:50 am
Can you provide more information on this? i have read other websites that are on similar subjects.
April 16th, 2009 at 7:54 am
Can you provide more information on this? i have read other websites that are on similar subjects.
April 16th, 2009 at 3:16 pm
I just found your blog on the google search engine and saw a few of your other posts that you had done . I just added you to my Google News Reader. Keep up the great work. i will Look forward to reading more from you again.
April 16th, 2009 at 3:21 pm
I really liked your blog! i read 4 others that are on similar subjets, but they domt update very often, thanks.
April 16th, 2009 at 3:21 pm
Very nice information. Thanks for this.its great to see someone with a like mind.
April 16th, 2009 at 10:06 pm
Wonderful and informative web site. I will recomend this site. Excelent work.
I am from Algeria and also now am reading in English, give please true I wrote the following sentence: “Get number, address, and driving directions.”
With love
, Scot.
April 17th, 2009 at 10:46 am
Very nice information. Thanks for this.its great to see someone with a like mind.
April 17th, 2009 at 10:50 am
I just found your blog on the google search engine and saw a few of your other posts that you had done . I just added you to my Google News Reader. Keep up the great work. i will Look forward to reading more from you again.
April 19th, 2009 at 8:56 am
wuKJaE gplfebiptfcs, [url=http://gieauwabetro.com/]gieauwabetro[/url], [link=http://oemdyoduceqj.com/]oemdyoduceqj[/link], http://nsbdzjxjhqqf.com/